Literature DB >> 21897596

Safety of type and screen method compared to conventional antiglobulin crossmatch procedures for compatibility testing in Indian setting.

Rajendra Chaudhary1, Nitin Agarwal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the past 30 years, pretransfusion tests have undergone considerable modification. In 1984, AABB recommended that the full cross match could be replaced by an abbreviated cross match in patients with negative antibody screen. However, before implementation of such a policy, issue regarding safety of T & S needs to be evaluated.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of pretransfusion testing (PTT) is to ensure that enough red blood cells (RBCs) in the selected red cell components will survive when transfused. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: We have, therefore in this study; evaluated safety of T & S procedure for PTT in comparison with conventional test tube cross match. The T & S procedure gave a safety of 91.6%. Also, the usefulness of the T & S was shown through the detection of unexpected antibodies in 0.75% (15 out of 2026) of cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross matching; pre transfusion testing; red cell transfusion; type and screen

Year:  2011        PMID: 21897596      PMCID: PMC3159247          DOI: 10.4103/0973-6247.83243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci        ISSN: 0973-6247


  5 in total

1.  Blood inventory management in the type and screen era.

Authors:  A Pereira
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.144

2.  Guidelines for pre-transfusion compatibility procedures in blood transfusion laboratories. BCSH Blood Transfusion Task Force.

Authors: 
Journal:  Transfus Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.019

3.  The risk of abbreviating the major crossmatch in urgent or massive transfusion.

Authors:  H A Oberman; B A Barnes; B A Friedman
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1978 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Pretransfusion tests and compatibility: questions of safety and efficacy.

Authors:  S P Masouredis
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  The type and screen: a safe alternative and supplement in selected surgical procedures.

Authors:  L I Boral; J B Henry
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.157

  5 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Blood transfusion practices in obstetric anaesthesia.

Authors:  Ashok Jadon; Rajni Bagai
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2014-09

2.  Prevalence and Specificity of RBC Alloantibodies in Indian Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  Shamsuz Zaman; Rahul Chaurasia; Kabita Chatterjee; Rakesh Mohan Thapliyal
Journal:  Adv Hematol       Date:  2014-10-16

3.  Antibody screening & identification in the general patient population at a tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India.

Authors:  Raj Nath Makroo; Aakanksha Bhatia; Vikas Hegde; Mohit Chowdhry; Uday Kumar Thakur; N L Rosamma
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  First Indian study to establish safety of immediate-spin crossmatch for red blood cell transfusion in antibody screen-negative recipients.

Authors:  Aseem Kumar Tiwari; Geet Aggarwal; Ravi C Dara; Dinesh Arora; Gautam Kumar Gupta; Vimarsh Raina
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2017 Jan-Jun

5.  Advantages of type and screen policy: Perspective from a developing country!

Authors:  Geet Aggarwal; Aseem K Tiwari; Dinesh Arora; Ravi C Dara; Devi P Acharya; Gunjan Bhardwaj; Jyoti Sharma
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2018 Jan-Jun

6.  Retrospective Study on Prevalence, Specificity, Sex, and Age Distribution of Alloimmunization in Two General Hospitals in Athens

Authors:  Marianna Politou; Serena Valsami; Georgios Dryllis; Maria Christodoulaki; Christina Cheropoulou; Abraham Pouliakis; Maria Baka; Konstantinos Stamoulis
Journal:  Turk J Haematol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 1.831

7.  Type and screen method and Coombs crossmatch method for pretransfusion testing: A prospective comparative study in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi.

Authors:  K Devi Anu; Sangeeta Pahuja; Geetika Sharma
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2022-05-26

8.  Outcome of type and screen versus crossmatch in cardiovascular surgery patients: A comparative study.

Authors:  Anupa Pokhrel; Ashish Jain; Neelam Marwaha; Rana Sandip Singh
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2022-05-26

9.  Benefits of VISION Max automated cross-matching in comparison with manual cross-matching: A multidimensional analysis.

Authors:  Hee-Jung Chung; Mina Hur; Sang Gyeu Choi; Hyun-Kyung Lee; Seungho Lee; Hanah Kim; Hee-Won Moon; Yeo-Min Yun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.