PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Heart failure is a life-limiting illness, but with great uncertainty over its prognosis. Policy increasingly states the importance of discussions about end of life care between patients and their clinicians. This study reviews the extent to which there is evidence that these conversations occur for heart failure patients in practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Although several opinion pieces and guidelines on this topic have emerged in recent years, little new empirical data have been published. Papers publishing empirical data since 2005 and other literature suggest that these conversations rarely occur. Many clinicians feel uncomfortable or lack confidence; and there is uncertainty whether patients want such discussions. Barriers and facilitators for discussions with heart failure are identified, regarding the nature of the disease, resource constraints and attitudes. The consequence is that disempowered patients rarely have such discussions: the 'elephant on the table' is rarely addressed. SUMMARY: The wide range of barriers identified all hinder conversations about the end of life with heart failure patients. Individual patient preferences for the timing and content of such conversations must be respected, including the wish of some not to have such conversations at all.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Heart failure is a life-limiting illness, but with great uncertainty over its prognosis. Policy increasingly states the importance of discussions about end of life care between patients and their clinicians. This study reviews the extent to which there is evidence that these conversations occur for heart failurepatients in practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Although several opinion pieces and guidelines on this topic have emerged in recent years, little new empirical data have been published. Papers publishing empirical data since 2005 and other literature suggest that these conversations rarely occur. Many clinicians feel uncomfortable or lack confidence; and there is uncertainty whether patients want such discussions. Barriers and facilitators for discussions with heart failure are identified, regarding the nature of the disease, resource constraints and attitudes. The consequence is that disempowered patients rarely have such discussions: the 'elephant on the table' is rarely addressed. SUMMARY: The wide range of barriers identified all hinder conversations about the end of life with heart failurepatients. Individual patient preferences for the timing and content of such conversations must be respected, including the wish of some not to have such conversations at all.
Authors: Lauren J Van Scoy; Michael J Green; Jean M Reading; Allison M Scott; Cynthia H Chuang; Benjamin H Levi Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Lori Wiener; Sima Bedoya; Haven Battles; Leonard Sender; Keri Zabokrtsky; Kristine A Donovan; Lora M A Thompson; Barbara B Lubrano di Ciccone; Margarita Bobonis Babilonia; Karen Fasciano; Paige Malinowski; Maureen Lyon; Jessica Thompkins; Corey Heath; Denise Velazquez; Karen Long-Traynor; Abigail Fry; Maryland Pao Journal: Palliat Support Care Date: 2022-08
Authors: Maisha T Robinson; Barbara G Vickrey; Robert G Holloway; Kelly Chong; Linda S Williams; Robert H Brook; Mei Leng; Punam Parikh; David S Zingmond Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-04-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Kriti Mittal; Kapil Sharma; Neha Dangayach; Dhaval Raval; Katherine Leung; Susan George; George Abraham Journal: J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect Date: 2014-04-14