Johanna Sommer1, Christopher Chung2, Dagmar M Haller2, Sophie Pautex3. 1. Faculty of Medicine Geneva, University Institute of Primary Care, University of Geneva, Centre Médical Universitaire, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1211, Genève 4, Switzerland. Johanna.sommer@unige.ch. 2. Faculty of Medicine Geneva, University Institute of Primary Care, University of Geneva, Centre Médical Universitaire, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1211, Genève 4, Switzerland. 3. University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Patients suffering from advanced cancer often loose contact with their primary care physician (PCP) during oncologic treatment and palliative care is introduced very late. The aim of this pilot study was to test the feasibility and procedures for a randomized trial of an intervention to teach PCPs a palliative care approach and communication skills to improve advanced cancer patients' quality of life. METHODS: Observational pilot study in 5 steps. 1) Recruitment of PCPs. 2) Intervention: training on palliative care competencies and communication skills addressing end-of-life issues. 3) Recruitment of advanced cancer patients by PCPs. 4) Patients follow-up by PCPs, and assessment of their quality of life by a research assistant 5) Feedback from PCPs using a semi-structured focus group and three individual interviews with qualitative deductive theme analysis. RESULTS: Eight PCPs were trained. Patient recruitment was a challenge for PCPs who feared to impose additional loads on their patients. PCPs became more conscious of their role and responsibility during oncologic treatments and felt empowered to take a more active role picking up patient's cues and addressing advance directives. They developed interprofessional collaborations for advance care planning. Overall, they discovered the role to help patients to make decisions for a better end-of-life. CONCLUSIONS: While the intervention was acceptable to PCPs, recruitment was a challenge and a follow up trial was not deemed feasible using the current design but PCPs reported a change in paradigm about palliative care. They moved from a focus on helping patients to die better, to a new role helping patients to define the conditions for a better end-of-life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The ethics committee of the canton of Geneva approved the study (2018-00077 Pilot Study) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Patients suffering from advanced cancer often loose contact with their primary care physician (PCP) during oncologic treatment and palliative care is introduced very late. The aim of this pilot study was to test the feasibility and procedures for a randomized trial of an intervention to teach PCPs a palliative care approach and communication skills to improve advanced cancerpatients' quality of life. METHODS: Observational pilot study in 5 steps. 1) Recruitment of PCPs. 2) Intervention: training on palliative care competencies and communication skills addressing end-of-life issues. 3) Recruitment of advanced cancerpatients by PCPs. 4) Patients follow-up by PCPs, and assessment of their quality of life by a research assistant 5) Feedback from PCPs using a semi-structured focus group and three individual interviews with qualitative deductive theme analysis. RESULTS: Eight PCPs were trained. Patient recruitment was a challenge for PCPs who feared to impose additional loads on their patients. PCPs became more conscious of their role and responsibility during oncologic treatments and felt empowered to take a more active role picking up patient's cues and addressing advance directives. They developed interprofessional collaborations for advance care planning. Overall, they discovered the role to help patients to make decisions for a better end-of-life. CONCLUSIONS: While the intervention was acceptable to PCPs, recruitment was a challenge and a follow up trial was not deemed feasible using the current design but PCPs reported a change in paradigm about palliative care. They moved from a focus on helping patients to die better, to a new role helping patients to define the conditions for a better end-of-life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The ethics committee of the canton of Geneva approved the study (2018-00077 Pilot Study) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer care / oncology; Death and dying; Doctor-patient relationship; Palliative care / end-of-life; Primary care; Quality of life
Authors: W Slort; B P M Schweitzer; A H Blankenstein; E A Abarshi; I I Riphagen; M A Echteld; N K Aaronson; He van der Horst; L Deliens Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2011-01-27 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Jennifer S Temel; Joseph A Greer; Alona Muzikansky; Emily R Gallagher; Sonal Admane; Vicki A Jackson; Constance M Dahlin; Craig D Blinderman; Juliet Jacobsen; William F Pirl; J Andrew Billings; Thomas J Lynch Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Tracy A Balboni; Lauren C Vanderwerker; Susan D Block; M Elizabeth Paulk; Christopher S Lathan; John R Peteet; Holly G Prigerson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-02-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Judith A Meiklejohn; Alexander Mimery; Jennifer H Martin; Ross Bailie; Gail Garvey; Euan T Walpole; Jon Adams; Daniel Williamson; Patricia C Valery Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2016-05-02 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Lucy Ellen Selman; Lisa Jane Brighton; Vicky Robinson; Rob George; Shaheen A Khan; Rachel Burman; Jonathan Koffman Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 3.234