Literature DB >> 21896843

Evaluation of an algorithm for detecting visual field defects due to chiasmal and postchiasmal lesions: the neurological hemifield test.

Michael V Boland1, Allison N McCoy, Harry A Quigley, Neil R Miller, Prem S Subramanian, Pradeep Y Ramulu, Peter Murakami, Helen V Danesh-Meyer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop an automated neurologic hemifield test (NHT) to detect visual field loss caused by chiasmal or postchiasmal lesions.
METHODS: Visual field locations from 24-2 pattern automated visual fields were grouped into two symmetric regions with 16 points on either side of the vertical meridian. A scoring system similar to the Glaucoma Hemifield Test (GHT) was used to calculate point scores using the pattern deviation values from the right and left regions. The cross-vertical difference in the sum of these values was the NHT score. The NHT was evaluated using visual fields from subjects with known neurologic disease, subjects with glaucoma, and glaucoma suspects (92 pairs of eyes each). The NHT score was calculated for each eye. Four masked reviewers scored all pairs of visual fields with regard to the likelihood of neurologic and glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Both NHT score and expert field ratings were compared with clinical diagnosis by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: The NHT effectively discriminated neurologic fields from those of glaucoma patients and glaucoma suspects (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-0.94). The NHT score correlated well with clinician grading (Pearson correlation estimates, 0.74-0.78). Even when field defects were subtle, the NHT had some ability to discriminate neurologic from nonneurologic fields (AUC 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56-0.79).
CONCLUSIONS: The NHT distinguished neurologic field defects from those of glaucoma and glaucoma suspects, rivaling the performance of subspecialist clinicians. Its implementation may help identify unsuspected neurologic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21896843      PMCID: PMC3207952          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-7868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  10 in total

1.  Neural networks for visual field analysis: how do they compare with other algorithms?

Authors:  T Lietman; J Eng; J Katz; H A Quigley
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease.

Authors:  Richard P Mills; Donald L Budenz; Paul P Lee; Robert J Noecker; John G Walt; Lisa R Siegartel; Stacy J Evans; John J Doyle
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R.

Authors:  Tobias Sing; Oliver Sander; Niko Beerenwinkel; Thomas Lengauer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Trained artificial neural network for glaucoma diagnosis using visual field data: a comparison with conventional algorithms.

Authors:  Dimitrios Bizios; Anders Heijl; Boel Bengtsson
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Glaucoma Hemifield Test. Automated visual field evaluation.

Authors:  P Asman; A Heijl
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-06

6.  Evaluation of methods for automated Hemifield analysis in perimetry.

Authors:  P Asman; A Heijl
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-06

7.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Interpretation of automated perimetry for glaucoma by neural network.

Authors:  M H Goldbaum; P A Sample; H White; B Côlt; P Raphaelian; R D Fechtner; R N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Repeatability of the Glaucoma Hemifield Test in automated perimetry.

Authors:  J Katz; H A Quigley; A Sommer
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Evaluation of a combined index of optic nerve structure and function for glaucoma diagnosis.

Authors:  Michael V Boland; Harry A Quigley
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 2.209

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Development and validation of an improved neurological hemifield test to identify chiasmal and postchiasmal lesions by automated perimetry.

Authors:  Allison N McCoy; Harry A Quigley; Jiangxia Wang; Neil R Miller; Prem S Subramanian; Pradeep Y Ramulu; Michael V Boland
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Quantitative Analysis of the Displacement of the Anterior Visual Pathway by Pituitary Lesions and the Associated Visual Field Loss.

Authors:  Michael V Boland; In Ho Lee; Elcin Zan; David M Yousem; Neil R Miller
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.