Literature DB >> 17224745

Trained artificial neural network for glaucoma diagnosis using visual field data: a comparison with conventional algorithms.

Dimitrios Bizios1, Anders Heijl, Boel Bengtsson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate and confirm the performance of an artificial neural network (ANN) trained to recognize glaucomatous visual field defects, and compare its diagnostic accuracy with that of other algorithms proposed for the detection of visual field loss.
METHODS: SITA Standard 30-2 visual fields, from 100 glaucoma patients and 116 healthy participants, formed the data set. Our ANN was a previously described fully trained network using scored pattern deviation probability maps as input data. Its diagnostic accuracy was compared to that of the Glaucoma Hemifield Test, the Pattern Standard Deviation index at the P<5% and <1%, and also to a technique based on the recognizing clusters of significantly depressed test points.
RESULTS: The included tests had early to moderate visual field loss (median MD=-6.16 dB). ANN achieved a sensitivity of 93% at a specificity level of 94% with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.984. Glaucoma Hemifield Test attained a sensitivity of 92% at 91% specificity. Pattern Standard Deviation, with a cut off level at P<5% had a sensitivity of 89% with a specificity of 93%, whereas at P<1% the sensitivity and specificity was 72% and 97%, respectively. The cluster algorithm yielded a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 82%.
CONCLUSIONS: The high diagnostic performance of our ANN based on refined input visual field data was confirmed in this independent sample. Its diagnostic accuracy was slightly to considerably better than that of the compared algorithms. The results indicate the large potential for ANN as an important clinical glaucoma diagnostic tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17224745     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31802b34e4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  19 in total

Review 1.  [The Hermann grid illusion: the classic textbook interpretation is obsolete].

Authors:  M Bach
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Predicting glaucomatous progression in glaucoma suspect eyes using relevance vector machine classifiers for combined structural and functional measurements.

Authors:  Christopher Bowd; Intae Lee; Michael H Goldbaum; Madhusudhanan Balasubramanian; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Development and validation of an improved neurological hemifield test to identify chiasmal and postchiasmal lesions by automated perimetry.

Authors:  Allison N McCoy; Harry A Quigley; Jiangxia Wang; Neil R Miller; Prem S Subramanian; Pradeep Y Ramulu; Michael V Boland
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Performance of the 10-2 and 24-2 Visual Field Tests for Detecting Central Visual Field Abnormalities in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Zhichao Wu; Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 5.  What is causing the corneal ulcer? Management strategies for unresponsive corneal ulceration.

Authors:  G Amescua; D Miller; E C Alfonso
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Evaluation of an algorithm for detecting visual field defects due to chiasmal and postchiasmal lesions: the neurological hemifield test.

Authors:  Michael V Boland; Allison N McCoy; Harry A Quigley; Neil R Miller; Prem S Subramanian; Pradeep Y Ramulu; Peter Murakami; Helen V Danesh-Meyer
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Automatic segmentation of up to ten layer boundaries in SD-OCT images of the mouse retina with and without missing layers due to pathology.

Authors:  Pratul P Srinivasan; Stephanie J Heflin; Joseph A Izatt; Vadim Y Arshavsky; Sina Farsiu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Automated diagnosis of glaucoma using digital fundus images.

Authors:  Jagadish Nayak; Rajendra Acharya U; P Subbanna Bhat; Nakul Shetty; Teik-Cheng Lim
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Detecting glaucomatous change in visual fields: Analysis with an optimization framework.

Authors:  Siamak Yousefi; Michael H Goldbaum; Ehsan S Varnousfaderani; Akram Belghith; Tzyy-Ping Jung; Felipe A Medeiros; Linda M Zangwill; Robert N Weinreb; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Christopher A Girkin; Christopher Bowd
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 6.317

10.  Integration and fusion of standard automated perimetry and optical coherence tomography data for improved automated glaucoma diagnostics.

Authors:  Dimitrios Bizios; Anders Heijl; Boel Bengtsson
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.