Literature DB >> 21896666

Diffusion tensor imaging of normal prostate at 3 T: effect of number of diffusion-encoding directions on quantitation and image quality.

C K Kim1, S M Jang, B K Park.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate differences of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) using a different number of diffusion-encoding directions and to evaluate the feasibility of tractography in healthy prostate at 3 T.
METHOD: 12 healthy volunteers underwent DTI with single-shot echo-planar imaging at 3 T using a phased-array coil. Diffusion gradients of each DTI were applied in 6 (Group 1), 15 (Group 2) and 32 (Group 3) non-collinear directions. For each group, the mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), fractional anisotrophy (FA) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were measured in the peripheral zone (PZ) and central gland (CG). The quality of diffusion-weighted and tractographic images were also evaluated.
RESULTS: In all three groups, the mean ADC value of the CG was statistically lower than that of the PZ (p<0.01) and the mean FA value of the CG was statistically greater than that of the PZ (p<0.01). For the mean FA value of the CG, no statistical difference was seen among the three groups (p=0.052). However, the mean FA value of the PZ showed a statistical difference among the three groups (p=0.035). No significant difference in SNR values was seen among the three groups (p>0.05). Imaging quality of diffusion-weighted tractographic images was rated as satisfactory or better in all three groups and was similar among the three groups.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, prostate DTI at 3 T was feasible with different numbers of diffusion-encoding directions. The number of diffusion-encoding directions did not have a significant effect on imaging quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21896666      PMCID: PMC3474052          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/21316959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  25 in total

1.  Comparison of gradient encoding schemes for diffusion-tensor MRI.

Authors:  K M Hasan; D L Parker; A L Alexander
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Clinical applications of diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Qian Dong; Robert C Welsh; Thomas L Chenevert; Ruth C Carlos; Pia Maly-Sundgren; Diana M Gomez-Hassan; Suresh K Mukherji
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  In vivo diffusion tensor imaging of the human prostate.

Authors:  Shantanu Sinha; Usha Sinha
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Derek K Jones
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  A comparative study of acquisition schemes for diffusion tensor imaging using MRI.

Authors:  N G Papadakis; D Xing; C L Huang; L D Hall; T A Carpenter
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Three-dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Mori; B J Crain; V P Chacko; P C van Zijl
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 10.422

7.  Age-related changes of the prostate: evaluation by MR imaging.

Authors:  K S Allen; H Y Kressel; P H Arger; H M Pollack
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Diffusion-tensor MR imaging and fiber tractography: a new method of describing aberrant fiber connections in developmental CNS anomalies.

Authors:  Seung-Koo Lee; Dong Ik Kim; Jinna Kim; Dong Joon Kim; Heung Dong Kim; Dong Seok Kim; Susumu Mori
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ryota Shimofusa; Hajime Fujimoto; Hajime Akamata; Ken Motoori; Seiji Yamamoto; Takuya Ueda; Hisao Ito
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Differentiation between glioblastomas and solitary brain metastases using diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Sumei Wang; Sungheon Kim; Sanjeev Chawla; Ronald L Wolf; Wei-Guo Zhang; Donald M O'Rourke; Kevin D Judy; Elias R Melhem; Harish Poptani
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  5 in total

1.  3-T diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of normal uterus in young and middle-aged females during the menstrual cycle: evaluation of the cyclic changes of fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values.

Authors:  Y He; N Ding; Y Li; Z Li; Y Xiang; Z Jin; H Xue
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Quantitative study of prostate cancer using three dimensional fiber tractography.

Authors:  Sandeep Hedgire; Alexey Tonyushkin; Aoife Kilcoyne; Jason A Efstathiou; Peter F Hahn; Mukesh Harisinghani
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-28

Review 3.  Diffusion and quantification of diffusion of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yoshiko Ueno; Tsutomu Tamada; Keitaro Sofue; Takamichi Murakami
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-19       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Evaluation of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using the Ratio of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Measures.

Authors:  Aslihan Onay; Gokhan Ertas; Metin Vural; Omer Acar; Yesim Saglican; Bilgen Coskun; Sergin Akpek
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Diffusion Is Directional: Innovative Diffusion Tensor Imaging to Improve Prostate Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Chen Shenhar; Hadassa Degani; Yaara Ber; Jack Baniel; Shlomit Tamir; Ofer Benjaminov; Philip Rosen; Edna Furman-Haran; David Margel
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.