INTRODUCTION: Health services delivered in an older person's home are often implemented at a critical juncture in an individual's functional status. Although homecare has potential to improve this situation, it often focuses on treating disease and 'taking care' of the patient rather than promoting independence. The aim of restorative homecare is to change the philosophy from one where delivery of care may create dependency to provision of care which maximises independence, self-esteem, self-image and quality of life, and reduces the care required. AIMS: To assess impact of a designated goal facilitation tool on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), social support and physical function among community-dwelling older people referred for homecare. METHODS: A total of 205 participants [mean age 79.1 years, 71.3% female (intervention group) and 76.9 years with 60.8% female (control group)] were cluster randomised to an intervention or control assessor. The intervention arm involved participants completing a goal facilitation tool with assessors. This established rehabilitation aims. Control participants received a standard needs assessment. Clients from both groups were then referred to a homecare organisation for service delivery. RESULTS: There was greater change over time in HRQoL [measured by Short Form 36 Survey (SF-36)] in the intervention group (P = 0.0001). There was a marked variation across homecare providers in types of services provided (P < 0.001). Identification of a goal did not predict completion of a formalised review of participants' needs by the homecare organisation. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a goal facilitation tool in assessment of an older person's needs on referral for homecare leads to significant improvements in HRQoL. This may be through a higher proportion of individualised activities tailored to a successful identification of the person's goals. The findings contribute to greater understanding of factors necessary to implement improvements in homecare services for older people.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: Health services delivered in an older person's home are often implemented at a critical juncture in an individual's functional status. Although homecare has potential to improve this situation, it often focuses on treating disease and 'taking care' of the patient rather than promoting independence. The aim of restorative homecare is to change the philosophy from one where delivery of care may create dependency to provision of care which maximises independence, self-esteem, self-image and quality of life, and reduces the care required. AIMS: To assess impact of a designated goal facilitation tool on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), social support and physical function among community-dwelling older people referred for homecare. METHODS: A total of 205 participants [mean age 79.1 years, 71.3% female (intervention group) and 76.9 years with 60.8% female (control group)] were cluster randomised to an intervention or control assessor. The intervention arm involved participants completing a goal facilitation tool with assessors. This established rehabilitation aims. Control participants received a standard needs assessment. Clients from both groups were then referred to a homecare organisation for service delivery. RESULTS: There was greater change over time in HRQoL [measured by Short Form 36 Survey (SF-36)] in the intervention group (P = 0.0001). There was a marked variation across homecare providers in types of services provided (P < 0.001). Identification of a goal did not predict completion of a formalised review of participants' needs by the homecare organisation. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a goal facilitation tool in assessment of an older person's needs on referral for homecare leads to significant improvements in HRQoL. This may be through a higher proportion of individualised activities tailored to a successful identification of the person's goals. The findings contribute to greater understanding of factors necessary to implement improvements in homecare services for older people.
Authors: William M M Levack; Mark Weatherall; E Jean C Hay-Smith; Sarah G Dean; Kathryn McPherson; Richard J Siegert Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-07-20
Authors: Phillip J Whitehead; Esme J Worthington; Ruth H Parry; Marion F Walker; Avril E R Drummond Journal: Clin Rehabil Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 3.477
Authors: Kerry Kuluski; Ashlinder Gill; Gayathri Naganathan; Ross Upshur; R Liisa Jaakkimainen; Walter P Wodchis Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2013-09-08 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Phillip J Whitehead; Avril E R Drummond; Marion F Walker; Ruth H Parry; Ian D McGeorge; Zaid Latif Journal: Trials Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Evan Mayo-Wilson; Sean Grant; Jennifer Burton; Amanda Parsons; Kristen Underhill; Paul Montgomery Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Timothy W Kenealy; Matthew J G Parsons; A Paul B Rouse; Robert N Doughty; Nicolette F Sheridan; Jennifer K Harré Hindmarsh; Sarah C Masson; Harry H Rea Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-03-13 Impact factor: 3.240