Literature DB >> 21896543

Cost comparison of axillary sentinel lymph node detection and axillary lymphadenectomy in early breast cancer. A national study based on a prospective multi-institutional series of 985 patients 'on behalf of the Group of Surgeons from the French Unicancer Federation'.

J M Classe1, S Baffert2, B Sigal-Zafrani3, M Fall2, C Rousseau4, S Alran5, P Rouanet6, C Belichard7, H Mignotte8, G Ferron9, F Marchal10, S Giard11, C Tunon de Lara12, G Le Bouedec13, J Cuisenier14, R Werner15, I Raoust16, J-F Rodier17, F Laki18, P-E Colombo6, S Lasry7, C Faure8, H Charitansky9, J-B Olivier10, M-P Chauvet11, E Bussières12, P Gimbergues13, B Flipo16, G Houvenaeghel19, F Dravet20, A Livartowski2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to assess the global cost of the sentinel lymph node detection [axillary sentinel lymph node detection (ASLND)] compared with standard axillary lymphadenectomy [axillary lymph node dissection (ALND)] for early breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multi-institutional, observational, cost comparative analysis. Cost calculations were realized with the micro-costing method from the diagnosis until 1 month after the last surgery.
RESULTS: Eight hundred and thirty nine patients were included in the ASLND group and 146 in the ALND group. The cost generated for a patient with an ASLND, with one preoperative scintigraphy, a combined method for sentinel node detection, an intraoperative pathological analysis without lymphadenectomy, was lower than the cost generated for a patient with lymphadenectomy [€ 2947 (σ = 580) versus € 3331 (σ = 902); P = 0.0001].
CONCLUSION: ASLND, involving expensive techniques, was finally less expensive than ALND. The length of hospital stay was the cost driver of these procedures. The current observational study points the heterogeneous practices for this validated and largely diffused technique. Several technical choices have an impact on the cost of ASLND, as intraoperative analysis allowing to reduce rehospitalization rate for secondary lymphadenectomy or preoperative scintigraphy, suggesting possible savings on hospital resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21896543      PMCID: PMC3335244          DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  25 in total

Review 1.  Pathological work-up of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer. Review of current data to be considered for the formulation of guidelines.

Authors:  G Cserni; I Amendoeira; N Apostolikas; J P Bellocq; S Bianchi; G Bussolati; W Boecker; B Borisch; C E Connolly; T Decker; P Dervan; M Drijkoningen; I O Ellis; C W Elston; V Eusebi; D Faverly; P Heikkila; R Holland; H Kerner; J Kulka; J Jacquemier; M Lacerda; J Martinez-Penuela; C De Miguel; J L Peterse; F Rank; P Regitnig; A Reiner; A Sapino; B Sigal-Zafrani; A M Tanous; S Thorstenson; E Zozaya; C A Wells
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Intraoperative immunohistochemistry staining of sentinel nodes in breast cancer: clinical and economical implications.

Authors:  Marianne Holm; Birgitte Paaschburg; Eva Balslev; Christen Kirk Axelsson; Gro Linno Willemoe; Henrik Lavlund Flyger
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  Role of routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Amit Goyal; Robert G Newcombe; Robert E Mansel; U Chetty; P Ell; L Fallowfield; M Kissin; M Sibbering
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  [The frequency of cancer in France in year 2002, and trends since 1968].

Authors:  Catherine Hill; Françoise Doyon
Journal:  Bull Cancer       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.276

5.  Volume-controlled vs no/short-term drainage after axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  R A Droeser; D M Frey; D Oertli; D Kopelman; M J Baas-Vrancken Peeters; A E Giuliano; K Dalberg; R Kallam; A Nordmann
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  Prospective multicentric randomized study comparing periareolar and peritumoral injection of radiotracer and blue dye for the detection of sentinel lymph node in breast sparing procedures: FRANSENODE trial.

Authors:  Jean-François Rodier; Michel Velten; Marc Wilt; Pierre Martel; Gwanaël Ferron; Véronique Vaini-Elies; Hervé Mignotte; Alain Brémond; Jean-Marc Classe; François Dravet; Thierry Routiot; Christine Tunon de Lara; Antoine Avril; Gérard Lorimier; Eric Fondrinier; Gilles Houvenaeghel; Sandrine Avigdor
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The impact of sentinel node biopsy and axillary staging strategy on hospital costs.

Authors:  R Rönkä; K v Smitten; H Sintonen; T Kotomäki; L Krogerus; E Leppänen; M Leidenius
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Randomised controlled trial of effects of early discharge after surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  N Bundred; P Maguire; J Reynolds; J Grimshaw; J Morris; L Thomson; L Barr; A Baildam
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-11-07

Review 9.  Management of the axilla in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  John R Benson; G Querci della Rovere
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Prognostic implications of isolated tumor cells and micrometastases in sentinel nodes of patients with invasive breast cancer: 10-year analysis of patients enrolled in the prospective East Carolina University/Anne Arundel Medical Center Sentinel Node Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Jennifer Reed; Martin Rosman; Kathryn M Verbanac; Ann Mannie; Zandra Cheng; Lorraine Tafra
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  5 in total

1.  Utilization of sentinel lymph node biopsy for uterine cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Stephanie Cham; Ling Chen; William M Burke; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; Vrunda Desai; Jim C Hu; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The Effectiveness of SMS Reminders on Appointment Attendance: a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nasim Boksmati; Kerryn Butler-Henderson; Kevin Anderson; Tony Sahama
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Real-time sentinel lymph node biopsy guidance using combined ultrasound, photoacoustic, fluorescence imaging: in vivo proof-of-principle and validation with nodal obstruction.

Authors:  Jeeun Kang; Jin Ho Chang; Sun Mi Kim; Hak Jong Lee; Haemin Kim; Brian C Wilson; Tai-Kyong Song
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  The role of general nuclear medicine in breast cancer.

Authors:  Lacey R Greene; Deborah Wilkinson
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2015-02-12

5.  Significance of Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 Expression as Supporting Marker to Cytokeratin 19 mRNA in Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Marek Murawski; Marta Woźniak; Kamila Duś-Szachniewicz; Paweł Kołodziej; Marta Rzeszutko; Piotr Ziółkowski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.