J M Classe1, S Baffert2, B Sigal-Zafrani3, M Fall2, C Rousseau4, S Alran5, P Rouanet6, C Belichard7, H Mignotte8, G Ferron9, F Marchal10, S Giard11, C Tunon de Lara12, G Le Bouedec13, J Cuisenier14, R Werner15, I Raoust16, J-F Rodier17, F Laki18, P-E Colombo6, S Lasry7, C Faure8, H Charitansky9, J-B Olivier10, M-P Chauvet11, E Bussières12, P Gimbergues13, B Flipo16, G Houvenaeghel19, F Dravet20, A Livartowski2. 1. Surgical Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-Center Gauducheau, Nantes. Electronic address: jm-classe@nantes.fnclcc.fr. 2. Medico economic unit, Institut Curie, Paris. 3. Pathology Department, Institut Curie, Paris. 4. Nuclear medicine Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-Center Gauducheau, Nantes. 5. Surgical Department, Institut Curie, Paris. 6. Surgical Department, Center Val d'Aurel Montpellier. 7. Surgical Department, Center René Huguenin, Saint Cloud. 8. Surgical Department, Center Léon Bérard, Lyon. 9. Surgical Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse. 10. Surgical Department, Center Alexis Vautrin, Nancy. 11. Surgical Department, Center Oscar Lambret, Lille. 12. Surgical Department, Center Bergonié, Bordeaux. 13. Surgical Department, Center Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand. 14. Surgical Department, Center Georges François Leclerc, Dijon. 15. Surgical Department, Center Jean Godinot, Reims. 16. Surgical Department, Center Georges Lacassagne, Nice. 17. Surgical Department, Center Paul Strauss, Strasbourg. 18. Medico economic unit, Institut Curie, Paris; Surgical Department, Institut Curie, Paris. 19. Surgical Department, Institut Paoli Calmette Marseille, France. 20. Surgical Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-Center Gauducheau, Nantes.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our objective was to assess the global cost of the sentinel lymph node detection [axillary sentinel lymph node detection (ASLND)] compared with standard axillary lymphadenectomy [axillary lymph node dissection (ALND)] for early breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multi-institutional, observational, cost comparative analysis. Cost calculations were realized with the micro-costing method from the diagnosis until 1 month after the last surgery. RESULTS: Eight hundred and thirty nine patients were included in the ASLND group and 146 in the ALND group. The cost generated for a patient with an ASLND, with one preoperative scintigraphy, a combined method for sentinel node detection, an intraoperative pathological analysis without lymphadenectomy, was lower than the cost generated for a patient with lymphadenectomy [€ 2947 (σ = 580) versus € 3331 (σ = 902); P = 0.0001]. CONCLUSION: ASLND, involving expensive techniques, was finally less expensive than ALND. The length of hospital stay was the cost driver of these procedures. The current observational study points the heterogeneous practices for this validated and largely diffused technique. Several technical choices have an impact on the cost of ASLND, as intraoperative analysis allowing to reduce rehospitalization rate for secondary lymphadenectomy or preoperative scintigraphy, suggesting possible savings on hospital resources.
BACKGROUND: Our objective was to assess the global cost of the sentinel lymph node detection [axillary sentinel lymph node detection (ASLND)] compared with standard axillary lymphadenectomy [axillary lymph node dissection (ALND)] for early breast cancerpatients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multi-institutional, observational, cost comparative analysis. Cost calculations were realized with the micro-costing method from the diagnosis until 1 month after the last surgery. RESULTS: Eight hundred and thirty nine patients were included in the ASLND group and 146 in the ALND group. The cost generated for a patient with an ASLND, with one preoperative scintigraphy, a combined method for sentinel node detection, an intraoperative pathological analysis without lymphadenectomy, was lower than the cost generated for a patient with lymphadenectomy [€ 2947 (σ = 580) versus € 3331 (σ = 902); P = 0.0001]. CONCLUSION: ASLND, involving expensive techniques, was finally less expensive than ALND. The length of hospital stay was the cost driver of these procedures. The current observational study points the heterogeneous practices for this validated and largely diffused technique. Several technical choices have an impact on the cost of ASLND, as intraoperative analysis allowing to reduce rehospitalization rate for secondary lymphadenectomy or preoperative scintigraphy, suggesting possible savings on hospital resources.
Authors: G Cserni; I Amendoeira; N Apostolikas; J P Bellocq; S Bianchi; G Bussolati; W Boecker; B Borisch; C E Connolly; T Decker; P Dervan; M Drijkoningen; I O Ellis; C W Elston; V Eusebi; D Faverly; P Heikkila; R Holland; H Kerner; J Kulka; J Jacquemier; M Lacerda; J Martinez-Penuela; C De Miguel; J L Peterse; F Rank; P Regitnig; A Reiner; A Sapino; B Sigal-Zafrani; A M Tanous; S Thorstenson; E Zozaya; C A Wells Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Amit Goyal; Robert G Newcombe; Robert E Mansel; U Chetty; P Ell; L Fallowfield; M Kissin; M Sibbering Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: R A Droeser; D M Frey; D Oertli; D Kopelman; M J Baas-Vrancken Peeters; A E Giuliano; K Dalberg; R Kallam; A Nordmann Journal: Breast Date: 2009-03-16 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: Jennifer Reed; Martin Rosman; Kathryn M Verbanac; Ann Mannie; Zandra Cheng; Lorraine Tafra Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2008-12-25 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Jason D Wright; Stephanie Cham; Ling Chen; William M Burke; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; Vrunda Desai; Jim C Hu; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Jeeun Kang; Jin Ho Chang; Sun Mi Kim; Hak Jong Lee; Haemin Kim; Brian C Wilson; Tai-Kyong Song Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Marek Murawski; Marta Woźniak; Kamila Duś-Szachniewicz; Paweł Kołodziej; Marta Rzeszutko; Piotr Ziółkowski Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 5.923