Literature DB >> 28213057

Utilization of sentinel lymph node biopsy for uterine cancer.

Jason D Wright1, Stephanie Cham2, Ling Chen3, William M Burke4, June Y Hou4, Ana I Tergas5, Vrunda Desai6, Jim C Hu7, Cande V Ananth8, Alfred I Neugut5, Dawn L Hershman9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To limit the potential short and long-term morbidity of lymphadenectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy has been proposed for endometrial cancer. The principle of sentinel lymph node biopsy relies on removal of a small number of lymph nodes that are the first drainage basins from a tumor and thus the most likely to harbor tumor cells. While the procedure may reduce morbidity, efficacy data are limited and little is known about how commonly the procedure is performed.
OBJECTIVE: We examined the patterns and predictors of use of sentinel lymph node biopsy and outcomes of the procedure in women with endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy. STUDY
DESIGN: We used the Perspective database to identify women with uterine cancer who underwent hysterectomy from 2011 through 2015. Billing and charge codes were used to classify women as having undergone lymphadenectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy, or no nodal assessment. Multivariable models were used to examine clinical, demographic, and hospital characteristics with use of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Length of stay and cost were compared among the different methods of nodal assessment.
RESULTS: Among 28,362 patients, 9327 (32.9%) did not undergo nodal assessment, 17,669 (62.3%) underwent lymphadenectomy, and 1366 (4.8%) underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 1.3% (95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.6%) of abdominal hysterectomies, 3.4% (95% confidence interval, 2.7-4.1%) of laparoscopic hysterectomies, and 7.5% (95% confidence interval, 7.0-8.0%) of robotic-assisted hysterectomies. In a multivariable model, more recent year of surgery was associated with performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Compared to abdominal hysterectomy, those undergoing laparoscopic (adjusted risk ratio, 2.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.89-3.18) and robotic-assisted (adjusted risk ratio, 2.69; 95% confidence interval, 2.19-3.30) hysterectomy were more likely to undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy. Among women who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy, length of stay and cost were lower for sentinel lymph node biopsy compared to lymphadenectomy.
CONCLUSION: The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy for endometrial cancer increased from 2011 through 2015. The increased use was most notable in women who underwent a robotic-assisted hysterectomy.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endometrial cancer; lymphadenectomy; sentinel lymph node; uterine cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28213057      PMCID: PMC5449248          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  29 in total

Review 1.  The role of sentinel lymph nodes in endometrial and cervical cancer.

Authors:  Blair Smith; Floor Backes
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Comparing indocyanine green, technetium, and blue dye for sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  J How; W H Gotlieb; J Z Press; J Abitbol; M Pelmus; A Ferenczy; S Probst; R Gotlieb; S Brin; S Lau
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 3.  Sentinel lymph node procedure in endometrial cancer: A systematic review and proposal for standardization of future research.

Authors:  Beatrice Cormier; Alexandre T Rozenholc; Walter Gotlieb; Marie Plante; Christopher Giede
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Lymphadenectomy influences the utilization of adjuvant radiation treatment for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Charu Sharma; Israel Deutsch; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Yaming Qiao; Xuming Sun; Clifford K Chao; Thomas J Herzog; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Feasibility and economic impact of same-day discharge for women who undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Maria B Schiavone; Thomas J Herzog; Cande V Ananth; Elizabeth T Wilde; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Stefano Basile; Francesco Maneschi; Andrea Alberto Lissoni; Mauro Signorelli; Giovanni Scambia; Roberto Angioli; Saverio Tateo; Giorgia Mangili; Dionyssios Katsaros; Gaetano Garozzo; Elio Campagnutta; Nicoletta Donadello; Stefano Greggi; Mauro Melpignano; Francesco Raspagliesi; Nicola Ragni; Gennaro Cormio; Roberto Grassi; Massimo Franchi; Diana Giannarelli; Roldano Fossati; Valter Torri; Mariangela Amoroso; Clara Crocè; Costantino Mangioni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Pathologic ultrastaging improves micrometastasis detection in sentinel lymph nodes during endometrial cancer staging.

Authors:  Christine H Kim; Robert A Soslow; Kay J Park; Emma L Barber; Fady Khoury-Collado; Joyce N Barlin; Yukio Sonoda; Martee L Hensley; Richard R Barakat; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 9.  Axillary node interventions in breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Roshni Rao; David Euhus; Helen G Mayo; Charles Balch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study.

Authors:  H Kitchener; A M C Swart; Q Qian; C Amos; M K B Parmar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: comparison of fluorescence dye with traditional radiocolloid and blue.

Authors:  Andrea Papadia; Maria Luisa Gasparri; Alessandro Buda; Michael D Mueller
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Trends in Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping and Adjuvant Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Natalia R Gómez-Hidalgo; Ling Chen; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; Caryn M St Clair; Cande V Ananth; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  Sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial and cervical cancer: a survey of practices and attitudes in gynecologic oncologists.

Authors:  Laura Moulton Chambers; Roberto Vargas; Chad M Michener
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.756

Review 4.  Paucity of data evaluating patient centred outcomes following sentinel lymph node dissection in endometrial cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Helena M Obermair; Montana O'Hara; Andreas Obermair; Monika Janda
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-04-01

Review 5.  Robotic surgery for gynecologic cancers: indications, techniques and controversies.

Authors:  Kiran H Clair; Krishnansu S Tewari
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 6.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer: state of the art.

Authors:  Luigi Della Corte; Pierluigi Giampaolino; Antonio Mercorio; Gaetano Riemma; Antonio Schiattarella; Pasquale De Franciscis; Giuseppe Bifulco
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.