OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of anti-incontinence surgical procedures (artificial urinary sphincter [AUS] or male sling) on bother due to urinary incontinence (UI) during sexual activity after radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2000 and December 2007, 27 men in a large single-surgeon RP series underwent anti-incontinence surgery with an AUS or male sling. In all, 16 of these 27 men completed a questionnaire retrospectively capturing bother attributable to UI during arousal and orgasm and the impact of the AUS/male sling on UI and sexual quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: In all, 15 men were evaluable. Of these, 11 were sexually active; four and seven men underwent AUS and sling placement, respectively. All 11 men had a marked improvement in stress UI symptoms, which was the primary indication for surgery. All men undergoing AUS had an improvement in their sexual QoL, and most (three of four men) indicated marked improvement. Slightly more than half of men undergoing the sling procedure reported marked improvement in sexual QoL. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows a beneficial effect of anti-incontinence surgery on UI during sexual activity. Whether these surgical approaches would benefit men with significant bother due to UI limited to sexual activity warrants further investigation.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of anti-incontinence surgical procedures (artificial urinary sphincter [AUS] or male sling) on bother due to urinary incontinence (UI) during sexual activity after radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2000 and December 2007, 27 men in a large single-surgeon RP series underwent anti-incontinence surgery with an AUS or male sling. In all, 16 of these 27 men completed a questionnaire retrospectively capturing bother attributable to UI during arousal and orgasm and the impact of the AUS/male sling on UI and sexual quality of life (QoL). RESULTS: In all, 15 men were evaluable. Of these, 11 were sexually active; four and seven men underwent AUS and sling placement, respectively. All 11 men had a marked improvement in stress UI symptoms, which was the primary indication for surgery. All men undergoing AUS had an improvement in their sexual QoL, and most (three of four men) indicated marked improvement. Slightly more than half of men undergoing the sling procedure reported marked improvement in sexual QoL. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows a beneficial effect of anti-incontinence surgery on UI during sexual activity. Whether these surgical approaches would benefit men with significant bother due to UI limited to sexual activity warrants further investigation.
Authors: Carolyn A Salter; Phil Vu Bach; Eduardo Miranda; Lawrence C Jenkins; Nicole Benfante; Elizabeth Schofield; Christian J Nelson; John P Mulhall Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Alexander B Nolsøe; Christian Fuglesang S Jensen; Peter B Østergren; Mikkel Fode Journal: Int J Impot Res Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 2.896
Authors: Paolo Capogrosso; Eugenio Ventimiglia; Walter Cazzaniga; Francesco Montorsi; Andrea Salonia Journal: World J Mens Health Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 5.400
Authors: Ioannis Mykoniatis; Koenraad van Renterghem; Ioannis Sokolakis; Georgios Hatzichristodoulou; Maxime Sempels; Robert Andrianne Journal: Int J Impot Res Date: 2020-03-17 Impact factor: 2.896