Literature DB >> 21895155

How accurate are the nonlinear chemical Fokker-Planck and chemical Langevin equations?

Ramon Grima1, Philipp Thomas, Arthur V Straube.   

Abstract

The chemical Fokker-Planck equation and the corresponding chemical Langevin equation are commonly used approximations of the chemical master equation. These equations are derived from an uncontrolled, second-order truncation of the Kramers-Moyal expansion of the chemical master equation and hence their accuracy remains to be clarified. We use the system-size expansion to show that chemical Fokker-Planck estimates of the mean concentrations and of the variance of the concentration fluctuations about the mean are accurate to order Ω(-3∕2) for reaction systems which do not obey detailed balance and at least accurate to order Ω(-2) for systems obeying detailed balance, where Ω is the characteristic size of the system. Hence, the chemical Fokker-Planck equation turns out to be more accurate than the linear-noise approximation of the chemical master equation (the linear Fokker-Planck equation) which leads to mean concentration estimates accurate to order Ω(-1∕2) and variance estimates accurate to order Ω(-3∕2). This higher accuracy is particularly conspicuous for chemical systems realized in small volumes such as biochemical reactions inside cells. A formula is also obtained for the approximate size of the relative errors in the concentration and variance predictions of the chemical Fokker-Planck equation, where the relative error is defined as the difference between the predictions of the chemical Fokker-Planck equation and the master equation divided by the prediction of the master equation. For dimerization and enzyme-catalyzed reactions, the errors are typically less than few percent even when the steady-state is characterized by merely few tens of molecules.
© 2011 American Institute of Physics

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21895155     DOI: 10.1063/1.3625958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  28 in total

1.  Dichotomous noise models of gene switches.

Authors:  Davit A Potoyan; Peter G Wolynes
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  State Space Truncation with Quantified Errors for Accurate Solutions to Discrete Chemical Master Equation.

Authors:  Youfang Cao; Anna Terebus; Jie Liang
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 1.758

3.  Perspective: Stochastic algorithms for chemical kinetics.

Authors:  Daniel T Gillespie; Andreas Hellander; Linda R Petzold
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 4.  Stochastic Modeling of Autoregulatory Genetic Feedback Loops: A Review and Comparative Study.

Authors:  James Holehouse; Zhixing Cao; Ramon Grima
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Discrete and continuous models of probability flux of switching dynamics: Uncovering stochastic oscillations in a toggle-switch system.

Authors:  Anna Terebus; Chun Liu; Jie Liang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  ACCURATE CHEMICAL MASTER EQUATION SOLUTION USING MULTI-FINITE BUFFERS.

Authors:  Youfang Cao; Anna Terebus; Jie Liang
Journal:  Multiscale Model Simul       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 7.  Mathematical Modelling in Plant Synthetic Biology.

Authors:  Anna Deneer; Christian Fleck
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

8.  Data-driven model reduction of agent-based systems using the Koopman generator.

Authors:  Jan-Hendrik Niemann; Stefan Klus; Christof Schütte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Moment fitting for parameter inference in repeatedly and partially observed stochastic biological models.

Authors:  Philipp Kügler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Noise propagation in two-step series MAPK cascade.

Authors:  Venkata Dhananjaneyulu; Vidya Nanda Sagar P; Gopalakrishnan Kumar; Ganesh A Viswanathan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.