Literature DB >> 21894502

The impact of three strains of oral bacteria on the surface and mechanical properties of a dental resin material.

Karen S Gregson1, Han Shih, Richard L Gregory.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if three strains of bacteria could impact the mechanical or surface properties of a dental resin material. Resin material specimens were incubated at 37°C in sterile saline, tryptic soy broth supplemented with sucrose (TSBS), or TSBS inoculated with Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus gordonii, or Streptococcus sanguis. The specimens were subjected to Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy before and after incubation. The flexural strength test was performed once a week for 6 weeks. Microhardness and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed on specimens at 1 and 6 weeks. Differences in the area under the carbonyl peak were statistically significant for the specimens incubated in the media inoculated with either S. mutans or S. gordonii. To determine why S. sanguis did not produce changes as the other bacteria did, triethylene glycol dimethacrylate, methacrylic acid, and triethylene glycol were added to bacterial cultures at increasing concentrations. Both methacrylic acid and triethylene glycol reduced the number of colony-forming units of S. sanguis. Specimens incubated in TSBS, saline or in culture with S. sanguis demonstrated a decrease in peak stress in week 1 of the flexure strength test. SEM demonstrated that surface topology changed for those specimens incubated in culture with S. mutans or S. gordonii. The changes in surface topology demonstrated here could contribute to the secondary caries and changes in esthetic properties seen clinically with the use of resin materials in dental restorations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21894502     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-011-0613-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  19 in total

1.  The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm.

Authors:  Thorsten Mathias Auschill; Nicole Birgit Arweiler; Michel Brecx; Elmar Reich; Anton Sculean; Lutz Netuschil
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.612

2.  Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion.

Authors:  Filiz Aykent; Isa Yondem; Atilla G Ozyesil; Solen K Gunal; Mustafa C Avunduk; Semiha Ozkan
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Biodegradation of resin-dentin interfaces increases bacterial microleakage.

Authors:  S Kermanshahi; J P Santerre; D G Cvitkovitch; Y Finer
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Effect of surface roughness on stain resistance of dental resin composites.

Authors:  Huan Lu; Leslie B Roeder; Lei Lei; John M Powers
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.843

5.  Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.

Authors:  Karin Sunnegårdh-Grönberg; Jan W V van Dijken; Ulrika Funegård; Anders Lindberg; Mats Nilsson
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations.

Authors:  Christian Splieth; Olaf Bernhardt; Annegret Heinrich; Hannelore Bernhardt; Georg Meyer
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.677

7.  Role of Streptococcus gordonii amylase-binding protein A in adhesion to hydroxyapatite, starch metabolism, and biofilm formation.

Authors:  J D Rogers; R J Palmer; P E Kolenbrander; F A Scannapieco
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Effects of resin composite components on glucosyltransferase of cariogenic bacterium.

Authors:  K Kawai; Y Tsuchitani
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-07

9.  Water sorption/solubility of dental adhesive resins.

Authors:  Juliana Malacarne; Ricardo M Carvalho; Mario F de Goes; Nadia Svizero; David H Pashley; Franklin R Tay; Cynthia K Yiu; Marcela Rocha de Oliveira Carrilho; Marcela Rocha de Oliveira Carrilho
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  The influence of 30-day-old Streptococcus mutans biofilm on the surface of esthetic restorative materials--an in vitro study.

Authors:  Suzana B P Fúcio; Fabíola G Carvalho; Lourenço Correr Sobrinho; Mário A C Sinhoreti; Regina M Puppin-Rontani
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  8 in total

1.  Cariogenic bacteria degrade dental resin composites and adhesives.

Authors:  M Bourbia; D Ma; D G Cvitkovitch; J P Santerre; Y Finer
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Physicochemical and biological properties of novel chlorhexidine-loaded nanotube-modified dentin adhesive.

Authors:  Sabrina A Feitosa; Jadesada Palasuk; Saulo Geraldeli; Lester Jack Windsor; Marco C Bottino
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 3.368

3.  Gene expression and protein synthesis of esterase from Streptococcus mutans are affected by biodegradation by-product from methacrylate resin composites and adhesives.

Authors:  Bo Huang; Lida Sadeghinejad; Olabisi I A Adebayo; Dengbo Ma; Yizhi Xiao; Walter L Siqueira; Dennis G Cvitkovitch; Yoav Finer
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Stoichiometry and Kinetics of Sequential Dimethacrylate Enzymolysis.

Authors:  S Frukhtbeyn; K Van Dongen; J Sun
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  No evidence for the growth-stimulating effect of monomers on cariogenic Streptococci.

Authors:  Ivana Nedeljkovic; Kumiko Yoshihara; Jan De Munck; Wim Teughels; Bart Van Meerbeek; Kirsten L Van Landuyt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Enterococcus faecalis Hydrolyzes Dental Resin Composites and Adhesives.

Authors:  Muna Q Marashdeh; Russel Gitalis; Celine Levesque; Yoav Finer
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.171

7.  Doxycycline-encapsulated nanotube-modified dentin adhesives.

Authors:  S A Feitosa; J Palasuk; K Kamocki; S Geraldeli; R L Gregory; J A Platt; L J Windsor; M C Bottino
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 6.116

8.  Novel Dental Adhesive with Biofilm-Regulating and Remineralization Capabilities.

Authors:  Yang Ge; Biao Ren; Xuedong Zhou; Hockin H K Xu; Suping Wang; Mingyun Li; Michael D Weir; Mingye Feng; Lei Cheng
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.