PURPOSE: To compare the effects of grid laser (GL), intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB), and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) in diffuse diabetic macular edema (DDME). PROCEDURES: One hundred and twenty-six patients (126 eyes) treated with GL (modified grid), IVTA (4 mg), and IVB (1.25 mg) injections, matched for best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and OCT-based central macular thickness at presentation, were enrolled. Primary outcome measure was change in best corrected logMAR visual acuity at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Rates of visual stabilization (within ±0.2 logMAR of baseline BCVA) (71.4, 83.3, 78.6%, respectively) were not different between the groups (p = 0.41) at 12-month follow-up. Higher rates of anatomical and functional success, however, were evident in IVB and IVTA groups within 6 months of treatment (p < 0.05 for both). No severe adverse effects except higher intraocular pressure (10 mm Hg from baseline) in one third (14 eyes) of the IVTA cases, who required trabeculectomy in 2 (4.8%) eyes, were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Intraocular injections may give favorable results within the first 6 months, and after 6 months, GL results seem to be more favorable in the treatment of treatment-naïve, acute, nonischemic, and center-involving DDME.
PURPOSE: To compare the effects of grid laser (GL), intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB), and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) in diffuse diabetic macular edema (DDME). PROCEDURES: One hundred and twenty-six patients (126 eyes) treated with GL (modified grid), IVTA (4 mg), and IVB (1.25 mg) injections, matched for best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and OCT-based central macular thickness at presentation, were enrolled. Primary outcome measure was change in best corrected logMAR visual acuity at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Rates of visual stabilization (within ±0.2 logMAR of baseline BCVA) (71.4, 83.3, 78.6%, respectively) were not different between the groups (p = 0.41) at 12-month follow-up. Higher rates of anatomical and functional success, however, were evident in IVB and IVTA groups within 6 months of treatment (p < 0.05 for both). No severe adverse effects except higher intraocular pressure (10 mm Hg from baseline) in one third (14 eyes) of the IVTA cases, who required trabeculectomy in 2 (4.8%) eyes, were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Intraocular injections may give favorable results within the first 6 months, and after 6 months, GL results seem to be more favorable in the treatment of treatment-naïve, acute, nonischemic, and center-involving DDME.
Authors: Ron Adelman; Aaron Parnes; Zofia Michalewska; Barbara Parolini; Claude Boscher; Didier Ducournau Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 3.411