AIMS: The aim of this study was to provide descriptive population-based pedometer data from adults aged 30-45 years in Finland, and to compare daily step counts with evidence-based indices. METHODS: The data was collected from 1853 participants in 7 consecutive days in winter 2007-08 in part of 27-year follow up of the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns study. RESULTS: The participants took (mean±standard deviation) 7499 ± 2908 steps/day. Step counts included 1925 ± 2052 aerobic steps/day gathered in bouts of at least 10 min continuous ambulatory activity. Women had more total steps than men ((7824 ± 2925 vs. 7089 ± 2774; p < 0.001). Although participants had higher mean total steps on weekdays than on weekend days, they took more aerobic steps on weekend days than weekdays (p < 0.001). High-level non-manual work, and unemployment were associated with having fewer total steps, but high-level non-manual workers had more aerobic steps than other occupation groups. According to pedometer thresholds proposed by Tudor-Locke and Basset, 26% of men and 16% of women could be classified as inactive (<5000 steps/day) and 20% of women and 15% of men would be classified as active (>10,000 steps/day). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that about one-quarter of men and one-fifth of women are considered as inactive, based on the number of daily total steps. Our results suggest that total steps may provide a very different picture of activity from aerobic steps; important differences are evident by socioeconomic position and day of the week.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to provide descriptive population-based pedometer data from adults aged 30-45 years in Finland, and to compare daily step counts with evidence-based indices. METHODS: The data was collected from 1853 participants in 7 consecutive days in winter 2007-08 in part of 27-year follow up of the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns study. RESULTS: The participants took (mean±standard deviation) 7499 ± 2908 steps/day. Step counts included 1925 ± 2052 aerobic steps/day gathered in bouts of at least 10 min continuous ambulatory activity. Women had more total steps than men ((7824 ± 2925 vs. 7089 ± 2774; p < 0.001). Although participants had higher mean total steps on weekdays than on weekend days, they took more aerobic steps on weekend days than weekdays (p < 0.001). High-level non-manual work, and unemployment were associated with having fewer total steps, but high-level non-manual workers had more aerobic steps than other occupation groups. According to pedometer thresholds proposed by Tudor-Locke and Basset, 26% of men and 16% of women could be classified as inactive (<5000 steps/day) and 20% of women and 15% of men would be classified as active (>10,000 steps/day). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that about one-quarter of men and one-fifth of women are considered as inactive, based on the number of daily total steps. Our results suggest that total steps may provide a very different picture of activity from aerobic steps; important differences are evident by socioeconomic position and day of the week.
Authors: Xiaolin Yang; Kaisa Kaseva; Liisa Keltikangas-Järvinen; Laura Pulkki-Råback; Mirja Hirvensalo; Markus Jokela; Mirka Hintsanen; Taina Hintsa; Anna Kankaanpää; Risto Telama; Nina Hutri-Kähönen; Jorma S A Viikari; Olli T Raitakari; Tuija Tammelin Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2017-04
Authors: Quan L Huynh; Christopher L Blizzard; Olli Raitakari; James E Sharman; Costan G Magnussen; Terence Dwyer; Markus Juonala; Mika Kähönen; Alison J Venn Journal: Hypertens Res Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 3.872
Authors: Xiaolin Yang; Mirja Hirvensalo; Mirka Hintsanen; Taina Hintsa; Laura Pulkki-Råback; Markus Jokela; Risto Telama; Tuija Tammelin; Nina Hutri-Kähönen; Jorma S A Viikari; Olli T Raitakari Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2014-12
Authors: Elizabeth C Lefferts; Esmée A Bakker; Salvatore Carbone; Carl J Lavie; Duck-Chul Lee Journal: Prog Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2021-02-26 Impact factor: 11.278
Authors: Jaana T Kari; Jaakko Pehkonen; Mirja Hirvensalo; Xiaolin Yang; Nina Hutri-Kähönen; Olli T Raitakari; Tuija H Tammelin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jana Pelclová; Karel Frömel; Emil Řepka; Ladislav Bláha; Aleš Suchomel; Igor Fojtík; Dana Feltlová; Petr Valach; Svatopluk Horák; Jiří Nykodým; Michal Vorlíček Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-10-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Xiaolin Yang; Janne Kulmala; Harto Hakonen; Mirja Hirvensalo; Suvi P Rovio; Katja Pahkala; Tuomas Kukko; Nina Hutri-Kähönen; Olli T Raitakari; Tuija H Tammelin Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2021-08-01
Authors: Olli Tikkanen; Piia Haakana; Arto J Pesola; Keijo Häkkinen; Timo Rantalainen; Marko Havu; Teemu Pullinen; Taija Finni Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 3.240