Literature DB >> 21893520

Semi-supervised learning improves gene expression-based prediction of cancer recurrence.

Mingguang Shi1, Bing Zhang.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Gene expression profiling has shown great potential in outcome prediction for different types of cancers. Nevertheless, small sample size remains a bottleneck in obtaining robust and accurate classifiers. Traditional supervised learning techniques can only work with labeled data. Consequently, a large number of microarray data that do not have sufficient follow-up information are disregarded. To fully leverage all of the precious data in public databases, we turned to a semi-supervised learning technique, low density separation (LDS).
RESULTS: Using a clinically important question of predicting recurrence risk in colorectal cancer patients, we demonstrated that (i) semi-supervised classification improved prediction accuracy as compared with the state of the art supervised method SVM, (ii) performance gain increased with the number of unlabeled samples, (iii) unlabeled data from different institutes could be employed after appropriate processing and (iv) the LDS method is robust with regard to the number of input features. To test the general applicability of this semi-supervised method, we further applied LDS on human breast cancer datasets and also observed superior performance. Our results demonstrated great potential of semi-supervised learning in gene expression-based outcome prediction for cancer patients. CONTACT: bing.zhang@vanderbilt.edu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21893520      PMCID: PMC3198572          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  29 in total

1.  Semi-supervised classification via local spline regression.

Authors:  Shiming Xiang; Feiping Nie; Changshui Zhang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.226

2.  Discriminative semi-supervised feature selection via manifold regularization.

Authors:  Zenglin Xu; Irwin King; Michael Rung-Tsong Lyu; Rong Jin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  2010-06-21

Review 3.  Gene-expression signatures in breast cancer.

Authors:  Christos Sotiriou; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Validated prediction of clinical outcome in sarcomas and multiple types of cancer on the basis of a gene expression signature related to genome complexity.

Authors:  Frédéric Chibon; Pauline Lagarde; Sébastien Salas; Gaëlle Pérot; Véronique Brouste; Franck Tirode; Carlo Lucchesi; Aurélien de Reynies; Audrey Kauffmann; Binh Bui; Philippe Terrier; Sylvie Bonvalot; Axel Le Cesne; Dominique Vince-Ranchère; Jean-Yves Blay; Françoise Collin; Louis Guillou; Agnès Leroux; Jean-Michel Coindre; Alain Aurias
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Semi-supervised recursively partitioned mixture models for identifying cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Devin C Koestler; Carmen J Marsit; Brock C Christensen; Margaret R Karagas; Raphael Bueno; David J Sugarbaker; Karl T Kelsey; E Andres Houseman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  A gene signature predictive for outcome in advanced ovarian cancer identifies a survival factor: microfibril-associated glycoprotein 2.

Authors:  Samuel C Mok; Tomas Bonome; Vinod Vathipadiekal; Aaron Bell; Michael E Johnson; Kwong-kwok Wong; Dong-Choon Park; Ke Hao; Daniel K P Yip; Howard Donninger; Laurent Ozbun; Goli Samimi; John Brady; Mike Randonovich; Cindy A Pise-Masison; J Carl Barrett; Wing H Wong; William R Welch; Ross S Berkowitz; Michael J Birrer
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 31.743

7.  SemiBoost: boosting for semi-supervised learning.

Authors:  Pavan Kumar Mallapragada; Rong Jin; Anil K Jain; Yi Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.226

Review 8.  Gene expression profiles as predictors of poor outcomes in stage II colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  An-Ting T Lu; Shelley R Salpeter; Anthony E Reeve; Steven Eschrich; Patrick G Johnston; Alain J Barrier; Francois Bertucci; Nicholas S Buckley; Edwin E Salpeter; Albert Y Lin
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.481

9.  A six-gene signature predicts survival of patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jeran K Stratford; David J Bentrem; Judy M Anderson; Cheng Fan; Keith A Volmar; J S Marron; Elizabeth D Routh; Laura S Caskey; Jonathan C Samuel; Channing J Der; Leigh B Thorne; Benjamin F Calvo; Hong Jin Kim; Mark S Talamonti; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Michael A Hollingsworth; Charles M Perou; Jen Jen Yeh
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Survival-related profile, pathways, and transcription factors in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Anne P G Crijns; Rudolf S N Fehrmann; Steven de Jong; Frans Gerbens; Gert Jan Meersma; Harry G Klip; Harry Hollema; Robert M W Hofstra; Gerard J te Meerman; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Ate G J van der Zee
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  21 in total

1.  Incorporating Omics Data in Genomic Prediction.

Authors:  Johannes W R Martini; Ning Gao; José Crossa
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Use of processed data to design an orderly logic gate to construct plasmids in GenoCAD.

Authors:  Pei Shi; Tao Wu; Panpan Li; Bingjie Guo; Gang Fang; Yafei Dong
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.615

Review 3.  Artificial Intelligence in Bulk and Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Data to Foster Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Marco Del Giudice; Serena Peirone; Sarah Perrone; Francesca Priante; Fabiola Varese; Elisa Tirtei; Franca Fagioli; Matteo Cereda
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Integrated Analysis of Whole Genome and Epigenome Data Using Machine Learning Technology: Toward the Establishment of Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Ken Asada; Syuzo Kaneko; Ken Takasawa; Hidenori Machino; Satoshi Takahashi; Norio Shinkai; Ryo Shimoyama; Masaaki Komatsu; Ryuji Hamamoto
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Semi-Supervised Projective Non-Negative Matrix Factorization for Cancer Classification.

Authors:  Xiang Zhang; Naiyang Guan; Zhilong Jia; Xiaogang Qiu; Zhigang Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Probe Region Expression Estimation for RNA-Seq Data for Improved Microarray Comparability.

Authors:  Karolis Uziela; Antti Honkela
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Computational dynamic approaches for temporal omics data with applications to systems medicine.

Authors:  Yulan Liang; Arpad Kelemen
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.522

8.  Integrative gene network construction to analyze cancer recurrence using semi-supervised learning.

Authors:  Chihyun Park; Jaegyoon Ahn; Hyunjin Kim; Sanghyun Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Breast cancer prognosis risk estimation using integrated gene expression and clinical data.

Authors:  Ashish Saini; Jingyu Hou; Wanlei Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Computational prognostic indicators for breast cancer.

Authors:  Xinan Yang; Xindi Ai; John M Cunningham
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.