Literature DB >> 21893312

Ergonomic factors on task performance in laparoscopic surgery training.

D J Xiao1, Jack J Jakimowicz, A Albayrak, R H M Goossens.   

Abstract

This paper evaluates the effect of ergonomic factors on task performance and trainee posture during laparoscopic surgery training. Twenty subjects without laparoscopic experience were allotted into 2 groups. Group 1 was trained under the optimal ergonomic simulation setting according to current ergonomic guidelines (Condition A). Group 2 was trained under non-optimal ergonomic simulation setting that can often be observed during training in a skills lab (Condition B). Posture analysis showed that the subjects held a much more neutral posture under Condition A than under Condition B (p<0.001). The subjects had less joint excursion and experienced less discomfort in their neck, shoulders, and arms under Condition A. Significant difference in task performance between Conditions A and B (p<0.05) was found. This study shows that the optimal ergonomic simulation setting leads to better task performance. In addition, no significant differences of task performance, for Groups 1 and 2 using the same test setting were found. However, better performance was observed for Group 1. It can be concluded that the optimal and non-optimal training setting have different learning effects on trainees' skill learning.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21893312     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  8 in total

1.  Ergonomics: making the OR a comfortable place.

Authors:  Olivia Cardenas-Trowers; Kristine Kjellsson; Kenneth Hatch
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Comparative assessment of surgeons' task performance and surgical ergonomics associated with conventional and modified flank positions: a simulation study.

Authors:  Yu Fan; Gaiqing Kong; Yisen Meng; Shutao Tan; Kunlin Wei; Qian Zhang; Jie Jin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Ergonomic Assessment of the Surgeon's Physical Workload During Robot-Assisted Versus Standard Laparoscopy in a French Multicenter Randomized Trial (ROBOGYN-1004 Trial).

Authors:  Judicaël Hotton; Emilie Bogart; Marie-Cécile Le Deley; Eric Lambaudie; Fabrice Narducci; Frédéric Marchal
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.339

Review 4.  Surgical ergonomics for urologists: a practical guide.

Authors:  Andrew T Gabrielson; Marisa M Clifton; Christian P Pavlovich; Michael J Biles; Mitchell Huang; Jacqueline Agnew; Phillip M Pierorazio; Brian R Matlaga; Petar Bajic; Zeyad R Schwen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  An Evaluation of the Effects of Human Factors and Ergonomics on Health Care and Patient Safety Practices: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Xuanyue Mao; Pengli Jia; Longhao Zhang; Pujing Zhao; Ying Chen; Mingming Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The effects of operating height and the passage of time on the end-point performance of fine manipulative tasks that require high accuracy.

Authors:  Ho Seon Choi; Hyunki In
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Ergonomic status of laparoscopic urologic surgery: survey results from 241 urologic surgeons in china.

Authors:  Boluo Liang; Lin Qi; Jinrui Yang; Zhenzhen Cao; Xiongbing Zu; Longfei Liu; Long Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Reliability of photographic posture analysis of adolescents.

Authors:  Zeynep Hazar; Gul Oznur Karabicak; Ugur Tiftikci
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-10-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.