Literature DB >> 21892626

Cartilage repair in the rabbit knee: mosaic plasty resulted in higher degree of tissue filling but affected subchondral bone more than microfracture technique: a blinded, randomized, controlled, long-term follow-up trial in 88 knees.

Stig Heir1, Asbjørn Årøen, Sverre Løken, Ingar Holme, Lars Engebretsen, Finn P Reinholt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Discrepancies and variances in outcome following different surgical techniques for cartilage repair are poorly understood. Successful repair relies on proper tissue filling without initiating degenerative processes in the cartilage-bone unit. Consequently, the objective of the current study was to compare two available techniques for cartilage repair, i.e., microfracture technique and mosaic plasty, regarding tissue filling and subchondral bone changes in an experimental model.
METHODS: A 4-mm pure chondral defect was created in the medial femoral condyle of both knees in New Zealand rabbits, aged 22 weeks. A stereomicroscope was used to optimize the preparation of the defects. In one knee (randomized), the defect was treated with microfracture technique whereas in the other with mosaic plasty. The animals were killed at 12, 24 and 36 weeks after surgery. Defect filling, new bone formation above the level of the tidemark and the density of subchondral mineralized tissue were estimated by histomorphometry.
RESULTS: Mosaic plasty resulted in a significantly 34% higher degree of tissue filling than microfracture technique at 36 weeks, SD of mean difference being 34%. Mosaic plasty resulted in significantly more new bone formation and reduced subchondral mineralized tissue density compared to microfracture technique. The differences between the two techniques were apparent mainly at the long-term follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Tissue filling is a limiting factor regarding microfracture technique when compared to mosaic plasty, whereas mosaic plasty resulted in more bone changes than microfracture technique-the implications of the latter remain to be settled. This study underlines the difficulty in predicting outcome in the single case with any of these two techniques, particularly in a long-term perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21892626     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1596-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  68 in total

Review 1.  Anatomy and physiology of the mineralized tissues: role in the pathogenesis of osteoarthrosis.

Authors:  David B Burr
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 2.  An analysis of the quality of cartilage repair studies.

Authors:  Rune B Jakobsen; Lars Engebretsen; James R Slauterbeck
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Cartilage repair. A critical review.

Authors:  K Messner; J Gillquist
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1996-10

Review 4.  Evaluating methods of restoring cartilaginous articular surfaces.

Authors:  J A Buckwalter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Treatment of deep cartilage defects of the knee using autologous chondrograft transplantation and by abrasive techniques--a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  P Visna; L Pasa; I Cizmár; R Hart; J Hoch
Journal:  Acta Chir Belg       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.090

6.  Effects of small incongruities in a sheep model of osteochondral autografting.

Authors:  Fred S Huang; Peter T Simonian; Anthony G Norman; John M Clark
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  A morphologic, biochemical, and biomechanical assessment of short-term effects of osteochondral autograft plug transfer in an animal model.

Authors:  J G Lane; W L Tontz; S T Ball; J B Massie; A C Chen; W C Bae; M E Amiel; R L Sah; D Amiel
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Treatment of deep cartilage defects of the patella with periosteal transplantation.

Authors:  R Lorentzon; H Alfredson; C Hildingsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Follow-up of osteochondral plug transfers in a goat model: a 6-month study.

Authors:  John G Lane; Jennifer B Massie; Scott T Ball; Michael E Amiel; Albert C Chen; Won C Bae; Robert L Sah; David Amiel
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-07-20       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Neocartilage after artificial cartilage repair in the rabbit: histology and proteoglycan fragments in joint fluid.

Authors:  K Messner; L S Lohmander; J Gillquist
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1993-07
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Toward improved clinical relevance of cartilage insult models in the rabbit knee: surgical access to the habitual weight-bearing region.

Authors:  Yuki Tochigi; Joseph A Buckwalter; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

2.  Microfracture for knee chondral defects: a survey of surgical practice among Canadian orthopedic surgeons.

Authors:  John Theodoropoulos; Tim Dwyer; Daniel Whelan; Paul Marks; Mark Hurtig; Pankaj Sharma
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Injectable Scaffold for Bone Marrow Stem Cells and Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 to Repair Cartilage.

Authors:  Raquel Vayas; Ricardo Reyes; María Rosa Arnau; Carmen Évora; Araceli Delgado
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Histological Comparison of Nanocomposite Multilayer Biomimetic Scaffold, A Chondral Scaffold, and Microfracture Technique to Repair Experimental Osteochondral Defects in Rats.

Authors:  Kazim Solak; Istemi Yucel; Z Okan Karaduman; Sena Arda; M Mufit Orak; Ahmet Midi
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2020-06-02

5.  Microfracture technique versus osteochondral autologous transplantation mosaicplasty in patients with articular chondral lesions of the knee: a prospective randomized trial with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Svend Ulstein; Asbjørn Årøen; Jan Harald Røtterud; Sverre Løken; Lars Engebretsen; Stig Heir
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Evaluation of Magnetic Nanoparticle-Labeled Chondrocytes Cultivated on a Type II Collagen-Chitosan/Poly(Lactic-co-Glycolic) Acid Biphasic Scaffold.

Authors:  Juin-Yih Su; Shi-Hui Chen; Yu-Pin Chen; Wei-Chuan Chen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Pathohistological investigation of osteochondral tissue obtained during total knee arthroplasty after osteochondral autologous transfer: a case report.

Authors:  Momoko Tanima-Nagai; Hideto Harada; Tomoki Aoyama; Shoki Yamaguchi; Akira Ito; Junichi Tajino; Hirotaka Iijima; Xiankai Zhang; Hiroshi Kuroki; Masahiko Kobayashi
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-06-06

Review 8.  The Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Articular Cartilage Regeneration and Disease Modelling: Are We Ready for Their Clinical Use?

Authors:  Michał S Lach; Monika A Rosochowicz; Magdalena Richter; Inga Jagiełło; Wiktoria M Suchorska; Tomasz Trzeciak
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 6.600

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.