BACKGROUND: Exact reconstruction of an osteochondral defect by autogenous transplantation (mosaicplasty) is difficult given the variation in joint surface contour. Clinical and experimental studies do not show the extent to which incongruity can be tolerated in autografting. HYPOTHESIS: Grafted articular cartilage will hypertrophy to correct the incongruity created by recession of the transplanted surface. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: To test the response of grafts to incongruities, osteochondral autografts were transplanted from the trochlea to the femoral condyle in adult male sheep stifle joints. In groups of 6 animals, graft surfaces were placed flush, countersunk 1 mm or countersunk 2 mm, then histologically analyzed 6 weeks after surgery. Cartilage thickness, condition of the articular surfaces, and preservation of hyaline characteristics were the primary features compared. RESULTS: Bony union, vascularization, and new bone formation were present in all grafts. Cartilage-to-cartilage healing did not occur. In flush specimens, cartilage changed minimally in thickness and histologic architecture. The specimens countersunk 1 mm demonstrated significant cartilage thickening (54.7% increase, P <.05). Chondrocyte hyperplasia, tidemark advancement, and vascular invasion occurred at the chondroosseous junction, and the surface remained smooth. Cartilage necrosis and fibrous overgrowth were observed in all grafts countersunk 2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally countersunk autografts possess a capacity for remodeling that can correct initial incongruities while preserving hyaline characteristics. Grafts placed deeper do not restore the contour or composition of the original articular surface. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: If preservation of normal hyaline cartilage is the objective, thin grafted articular cartilage can remodel, but the tolerance for incongruity is limited and probably less than that reported for an intra-articular fracture.
BACKGROUND: Exact reconstruction of an osteochondral defect by autogenous transplantation (mosaicplasty) is difficult given the variation in joint surface contour. Clinical and experimental studies do not show the extent to which incongruity can be tolerated in autografting. HYPOTHESIS: Grafted articular cartilage will hypertrophy to correct the incongruity created by recession of the transplanted surface. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: To test the response of grafts to incongruities, osteochondral autografts were transplanted from the trochlea to the femoral condyle in adult male sheep stifle joints. In groups of 6 animals, graft surfaces were placed flush, countersunk 1 mm or countersunk 2 mm, then histologically analyzed 6 weeks after surgery. Cartilage thickness, condition of the articular surfaces, and preservation of hyaline characteristics were the primary features compared. RESULTS: Bony union, vascularization, and new bone formation were present in all grafts. Cartilage-to-cartilage healing did not occur. In flush specimens, cartilage changed minimally in thickness and histologic architecture. The specimens countersunk 1 mm demonstrated significant cartilage thickening (54.7% increase, P <.05). Chondrocyte hyperplasia, tidemark advancement, and vascular invasion occurred at the chondroosseous junction, and the surface remained smooth. Cartilage necrosis and fibrous overgrowth were observed in all grafts countersunk 2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally countersunk autografts possess a capacity for remodeling that can correct initial incongruities while preserving hyaline characteristics. Grafts placed deeper do not restore the contour or composition of the original articular surface. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: If preservation of normal hyaline cartilage is the objective, thin grafted articular cartilage can remodel, but the tolerance for incongruity is limited and probably less than that reported for an intra-articular fracture.
Authors: Niall A Smyth; Christopher D Murawski; Amgad M Haleem; Charles P Hannon; Ian Savage-Elliott; John G Kennedy Journal: World J Orthop Date: 2012-07-18
Authors: Tomasz L Nosewicz; Mikel L Reilingh; Martin Wolny; C Niek van Dijk; Georg N Duda; Hanna Schell Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Adam B Yanke; Atsushi Urita; Jason J Shin; Greg L Cvetanovich; Erin K Moran; Bernard R Bach; Brian J Cole; Nozomu Inoue; Nikhil N Verma Journal: Cartilage Date: 2018-01-16 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Stephen Sebastyan; Manuela Kunz; A James Stewart; Davide D Bardana Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: John S Theodoropoulos; J N Amritha De Croos; Sam S Park; Robert Pilliar; Rita A Kandel Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: J P Petersen; P Ueblacker; C Goepfert; P Adamietz; K Baumbach; A Stork; J M Rueger; R Poertner; M Amling; N M Meenen Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2007-10-24 Impact factor: 3.896