BACKGROUND: Deep sequencing is a highly sensitive technique that can detect and quantify the proportion of non-R5 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) variants, including small minorities, that may emerge and cause virologic failure in patients who receive maraviroc-containing regimens. We retrospectively tested the ability of deep sequencing to predict response to a maraviroc-containing regimen in the Maraviroc versus Efavirenz in Treatment-Naive Patients (MERIT) trial. Results were compared with those obtained using the Enhanced Sensitivity Trofile Assay (ESTA), which is widely used in clinical practice. METHODS: Screening plasma samples from treatment-naive patients who received maraviroc and efavirenz in the MERIT trial were assessed. Samples were extracted, and the V3 region of HIV type 1 glycoprotein 120 was amplified in triplicate and combined in equal quantities before sequencing on a Roche/454 Genome Sequencer-FLX (n = 859). Tropism was inferred from third variable (V3) sequences, with samples classified as non-R5 if ≥2% of the viral population scored ≤3.5 using geno2pheno. RESULTS: Deep sequencing distinguished between responders and nonresponders to maraviroc. Among patients identified as having R5-HIV by deep sequencing, 67% of maraviroc recipients and 69% of efavirenz recipients had a plasma viral load <50 copies/mL at week 48, similar to the ESTA results: 68% and 68%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Reanalysis of the MERIT trial using deep V3 loop sequencing indicates that, had patients originally been screened using this method, the maraviroc arm would have likely been found to be noninferior to the efavirenz arm.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Deep sequencing is a highly sensitive technique that can detect and quantify the proportion of non-R5 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) variants, including small minorities, that may emerge and cause virologic failure in patients who receive maraviroc-containing regimens. We retrospectively tested the ability of deep sequencing to predict response to a maraviroc-containing regimen in the Maraviroc versus Efavirenz in Treatment-Naive Patients (MERIT) trial. Results were compared with those obtained using the Enhanced Sensitivity Trofile Assay (ESTA), which is widely used in clinical practice. METHODS: Screening plasma samples from treatment-naive patients who received maraviroc and efavirenz in the MERIT trial were assessed. Samples were extracted, and the V3 region of HIV type 1 glycoprotein 120 was amplified in triplicate and combined in equal quantities before sequencing on a Roche/454 Genome Sequencer-FLX (n = 859). Tropism was inferred from third variable (V3) sequences, with samples classified as non-R5 if ≥2% of the viral population scored ≤3.5 using geno2pheno. RESULTS: Deep sequencing distinguished between responders and nonresponders to maraviroc. Among patients identified as having R5-HIV by deep sequencing, 67% of maraviroc recipients and 69% of efavirenz recipients had a plasma viral load <50 copies/mL at week 48, similar to the ESTA results: 68% and 68%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Reanalysis of the MERIT trial using deep V3 loop sequencing indicates that, had patients originally been screened using this method, the maraviroc arm would have likely been found to be noninferior to the efavirenz arm.
Authors: Sherry McLaughlin; Luke C Swenson; Shengbo Hu; Paul Hughes; P Richard Harrigan; Robert W Coombs; Lisa M Frenkel Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Guinevere Q Lee; P Richard Harrigan; Winnie Dong; Art F Y Poon; Jayvant Heera; James Demarest; Alex Rinehart; Doug Chapman; Hernan Valdez; Simon Portsmouth Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Jori Symons; Linos Vandekerckhove; Gero Hütter; Annemarie M J Wensing; Petra M van Ham; Steven G Deeks; Monique Nijhuis Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-04-23 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Jan Weber; Ana C Vazquez; Dane Winner; Richard M Gibson; Ariel M Rhea; Justine D Rose; Doug Wylie; Kenneth Henry; Alison Wright; Kevin King; John Archer; Eva Poveda; Vicente Soriano; David L Robertson; Paul D Olivo; Eric J Arts; Miguel E Quiñones-Mateu Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 5.948