Literature DB >> 21888929

Sustained attention in mice: expanding the translational utility of the SAT by incorporating the Michigan Controlled Access Response Port (MICARP).

Megan St Peters1, Ajeesh Koshy Cherian, Marc Bradshaw, Martin Sarter.   

Abstract

Advances in mouse genetic technology have spurred increasing interest in the development of cognitive tasks for mice. Here, we describe and discuss the modifications necessary to adapt a task for the assessment of sustained attention performance for use in mice, including for taxing the top-down control of such performance. The validity of the Sustained Attention Task (SAT), including the distractor version (dSAT), has previously been demonstrated in rats and humans. This task requires moveable or retractable operanda; insertion of operanda into the operant chambers cues animals to respond to a prior signal or non-signal event, reporting either a hit or a miss, or a correct rejection or false alarm, respectively. Retractable levers did not support sufficiently high and stable levels of performance in mice. Given the widespread use of static nose-poke devices for testing operant performance in mice, we therefore designed and fabricated a retractable nose-poke device. As this device extends into chambers, a hole for nose-poking is slowly opened and closed again as the device retracts (termed the "Michigan Controlled Access Response Port", MICARP). Results describe the effects of variation of signal duration and event rate, trial outcome and trial type probability, effects of mice deprivation levels, and the reliability of SAT and dSAT performance. Mice perform the SAT and dSAT at levels comparable to those observed in rats. This task will be of assistance in expanding the translational usefulness of the SAT and dSAT.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21888929      PMCID: PMC3179839          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.08.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  51 in total

1.  Dynamic vs static stimuli in their effect on visual vigilance performance.

Authors:  H S Koelega; J A Brinkman; B Zwep; M N Verbaten
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1990-06

2.  Interaction of signal discriminability and task type in vigilance decrement.

Authors:  R Parasuraman; M Mouloua
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-01

Review 3.  Predicting drug efficacy for cognitive deficits in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jim J Hagan; Declan N C Jones
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Enhancement of attentional performance by selective stimulation of alpha4beta2(*) nAChRs: underlying cholinergic mechanisms.

Authors:  William M Howe; Jinzhao Ji; Vinay Parikh; Sarah Williams; Elisabeth Mocaër; Caryn Trocmé-Thibierge; Martin Sarter
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 5.  Preclinical research into cognition enhancers.

Authors:  Martin Sarter
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 14.819

6.  Augmented prefrontal acetylcholine release during challenged attentional performance.

Authors:  Rouba Kozak; John P Bruno; Martin Sarter
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Differential acquisition of lever pressing in inbred and outbred mice: comparison of one-lever and two-lever procedures and correlation with differences in locomotor activity.

Authors:  Todd L McKerchar; Troy J Zarcone; Stephen C Fowler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Challenges to attention: a continuous arterial spin labeling (ASL) study of the effects of distraction on sustained attention.

Authors:  Elise Demeter; Luis Hernandez-Garcia; Martin Sarter; Cindy Lustig
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Lethal impairment of cholinergic neurotransmission in hemicholinium-3-sensitive choline transporter knockout mice.

Authors:  Shawn M Ferguson; Mihaela Bazalakova; Valentina Savchenko; Juan Carlos Tapia; Jane Wright; Randy D Blakely
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Behavioral vigilance in rats: task validation and effects of age, amphetamine, and benzodiazepine receptor ligands.

Authors:  J McGaughy; M Sarter
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  CNTRICS final animal model task selection: control of attention.

Authors:  C Lustig; R Kozak; M Sarter; J W Young; T W Robbins
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Monitoring cholinergic activity during attentional performance in mice heterozygous for the choline transporter: a model of cholinergic capacity limits.

Authors:  Giovanna Paolone; Caitlin S Mallory; Ajeesh Koshy Cherian; Thomas R Miller; Randy D Blakely; Martin Sarter
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 3.  What do phasic cholinergic signals do?

Authors:  Martin Sarter; Cindy Lustig; Anne S Berry; Howard Gritton; William M Howe; Vinay Parikh
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Cholinergic control over attention in rats prone to attribute incentive salience to reward cues.

Authors:  Giovanna Paolone; Christopher C Angelakos; Paul J Meyer; Terry E Robinson; Martin Sarter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Cholinergic double duty: cue detection and attentional control.

Authors:  Martin Sarter; Cindy Lustig
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-01-04

6.  Repetitive mild concussion in subjects with a vulnerable cholinergic system: Lasting cholinergic-attentional impairments in CHT+/- mice.

Authors:  Ajeesh Koshy Cherian; Natalie C Tronson; Vinay Parikh; Aaron Kucinski; Randy D Blakely; Martin Sarter
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 7.  Cholinergic genetics of visual attention: Human and mouse choline transporter capacity variants influence distractibility.

Authors:  Martin Sarter; Cindy Lustig; Randy D Blakely; Ajeesh Koshy Cherian
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2016-07-09

8.  The ability for cocaine and cocaine-associated cues to compete for attention.

Authors:  Kyle K Pitchers; Taylor R Wood; Cari J Skrzynski; Terry E Robinson; Martin Sarter
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Cortical cholinergic signaling controls the detection of cues.

Authors:  Howard J Gritton; William M Howe; Caitlin S Mallory; Vaughn L Hetrick; Joshua D Berke; Martin Sarter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Visual Selective Attention in Mice.

Authors:  Lupeng Wang; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.