Literature DB >> 21888705

Comparison of the outcomes of the sling technique using a commercial and hand-made polypropylene sling.

Luciane Maria Oliveira Brito1, Antonio de Pádua Silva Sousa, José Albuquerque de Figueiredo Neto, Thaiana Bezerra Duarte, George do Lago Pinheiro, Maria Bethânia da Costa Chein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes and costs of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery using a hand-made sling (Marlex®) versus a commerciallyavailable suburethral polypropylene sling (Advantage®).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine women with SUI due to bladder neck hypermobility and/or sphincter incompetence diagnosed by clinical examination and urodynamic studies were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 19) consisted of patients from an academic center (Department of Urology, University Hospital of Federal University of Maranhao, and group 2 (n = 20) patients from private practice. The hand-made polypropylene suburethral sling was used in group 1 and the commercial sling in group 2. The patients were evaluated 30, 60 and 90 days after surgery.
RESULTS: The mean duration of surgery was 43 min. in group 1 and 51 min. in group 2. No postoperative voiding difficulties were observed in group 1 (100%), as well as, in 94.7% of patients of group 2. A bladder catheter was not required in any of the patients of the two groups at the end of the study. The level of satisfaction was 100% in group 1, whereas, one patient of group 2 considered the surgery to be unsuccessful. Urodynamic studies showed low amplitude uninhibited contraction in 11.1% of patients of group 1 and 10.5% of group 2. No complications were observed in either group.
CONCLUSION: The hand-made polypropylene mesh (Marlex®) can be used for sling procedures, saving costs and yielding results similar to that obtained with commercial sling systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21888705     DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382011000400012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


  4 in total

Review 1.  Safety considerations for synthetic sling surgery.

Authors:  Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  The evolution of stress urinary incontinence treatment techniques of the last three decades.

Authors:  Cassio Luis Zanettini Riccetto
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Incontinence outcomes in women undergoing retropubic mid-urethral sling: a retrospective cohort study comparing Safyre™ and handmade sling.

Authors:  Fernando Terziotti; Emerson Pereira Gregório; Marcio Augusto Averbeck; Silvio Henrique Maia Almeida
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Functional outcomes and quality of life after transobturatory slings: hand - made vs. commercial slings.

Authors:  Danilo Budib Lourenço; Fernando Korkes; José Eduardo Vetorazzo; Silvia da Silva Carramão; Antônio Pedro Flores Auge; Luis Gustavo Morato de Toledo
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.