Literature DB >> 2188850

Intra and inter-person sources of variability in fat intake in a feeding trial of 14 men.

J R Hebert1, J Y Chen Backlund, A Engle, J Barone, K Biener.   

Abstract

An impediment to analyzing the effect of nutritional factors on biologic processes or health status in human populations arises from the relatively small dietary differences that exist between individuals in relation to large periodic fluctuations in dietary intake and the imprecision with which diet is normally assessed. We report here on characteristics of dietary variability in a group of 14 young men who successfully completed an intervention study specifically designed to create large differences in fat intake between baseline and two dietary intervention-periods each lasting two months (during which safflower and coconut oil supplements were given). We found that in the second supplemental phase of the intervention inter-person sources of variability were greatly increased over the low-fat baseline values. For proportion of calories as fat it increased to 64.2% of total variance from 21.6% without supplementation; for saturated fatty acids, 47.3% from 17.7%; for polyunsaturated fatty acids, 62.4% from 22.8%; and for the P:S ratio, 71.5% from 21.6%. During the first intervention phase we observed only moderate changes. Reasons for the intervention phase differences in effect, implications for feeding trials designed to look at dietary fat effects, and the need for future studies aimed at clarifying these results are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2188850     DOI: 10.1007/BF00155550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  5 in total

1.  Homogeneity in nutritional exposure: an impediment in cancer epidemiology.

Authors:  E L Wynder; J R Hebert
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  The Fat Portion Exchange List: a tool for teaching and evaluating low-fat diets.

Authors:  A P Boyar; J R Loughridge
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1985-05

3.  Sources of variance in 24-hour dietary recall data: implications for nutrition study design and interpretation.

Authors:  G H Beaton; J Milner; P Corey; V McGuire; M Cousins; E Stewart; M de Ramos; D Hewitt; P V Grambsch; N Kassim; J A Little
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Dietary fat and natural-killer-cell activity.

Authors:  J Barone; J R Hebert; M M Reddy
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 5.  Methodologic considerations for investigating the diet-cancer link.

Authors:  J R Hebert; D R Miller
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 7.045

  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Reply to E Archer and SN Blair.

Authors:  James R Hébert; Thomas G Hurley; Susan E Steck; Donald R Miller; Fred K Tabung; Lawrence H Kushi; Edward A Frongillo
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 2.  Considering the value of dietary assessment data in informing nutrition-related health policy.

Authors:  James R Hébert; Thomas G Hurley; Susan E Steck; Donald R Miller; Fred K Tabung; Karen E Peterson; Lawrence H Kushi; Edward A Frongillo
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  Meal timing, distribution of macronutrients, and inflammation among African-American women: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Samantha C Truman; Michael D Wirth; Swann Arp Adams; Gabrielle M Turner-McGrievy; Kelly E Reiss; James R Hébert
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.749

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.