Literature DB >> 21886859

Complete genome sequence of Nitratifractor salsuginis type strain (E9I37-1).

Iain Anderson, Johannes Sikorski, Ahmet Zeytun, Matt Nolan, Alla Lapidus, Susan Lucas, Nancy Hammon, Shweta Deshpande, Jan-Fang Cheng, Roxanne Tapia, Cliff Han, Lynne Goodwin, Sam Pitluck, Konstantinos Liolios, Ioanna Pagani, Natalia Ivanova, Marcel Huntemann, Konstantinos Mavromatis, Galina Ovchinikova, Amrita Pati, Amy Chen, Krishna Palaniappan, Miriam Land, Loren Hauser, Evelyne-Marie Brambilla, Olivier D Ngatchou-Djao, Manfred Rohde, Brian J Tindall, Markus Göker, John C Detter, Tanja Woyke, James Bristow, Jonathan A Eisen, Victor Markowitz, Philip Hugenholtz, Hans-Peter Klenk, Nikos C Kyrpides.   

Abstract

Nitratifractor salsuginis Nakagawa et al. 2005 is the type species of the genus Nitratifractor, a member of the family Nautiliaceae. The species is of interest because of its high capacity for nitrate reduction via conversion to N(2) through respiration, which is a key compound in plant nutrition. The strain is also of interest because it represents the first mesophilic and facultatively anaerobic member of the Epsilonproteobacteria reported to grow on molecular hydrogen. This is the first completed genome sequence of a member of the genus Nitratifractor and the second sequence from the family Nautiliaceae. The 2,101,285 bp long genome with its 2,121 protein-coding and 54 RNA genes is a part of the Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea project.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GEBA; Gram-negative; Nautiliaceae; anaerobic; mesophilic; microaerobic; non-motile; strictly chemolithoautotroph

Year:  2011        PMID: 21886859      PMCID: PMC3156401          DOI: 10.4056/sigs.1844518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Strain E9I37-1T (= DSM 16511 = JCM 12458) is the type strain of Nitratifractor salsuginis, which in turn is the type and currently only species of the genus Nitratifractor [1]. The genus name is derived from the Neo-Latin word nitras meaning nitrate and the Latin word fractor meaning breaker, yielding the Neo-Latin word Nitratifractor meaning nitrate-breaker [1]. N. salsuginis strain E9I37-1T was isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimney at the Iheya North hydrothermal field in the Mid-Okinawa Trough in Japan [1,2]. No further isolates of N. salsuginis have been obtained so far. Here we present a summary classification and a set of features for N. salsuginis E9I37-1T, together with the description of the complete genomic sequencing and annotation.

Classification and features

A representative genomic 16S rRNA sequence of strain E9I37-1T was compared using NCBI BLAST under default settings (e.g., considering only the high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) from the best 250 hits) with the most recent release of the Greengenes database [3] and the relative frequencies, weighted by BLAST scores, of taxa and keywords (reduced to their stem [4]) were determined. The four most frequent genera were Nitratiruptor (48.5%), Nitratifractor (20.7%), Hydrogenimonas (15.7%) and Alvinella (15.1%) (eleven hits in total). Regarding the single hit to sequences from members of the species, the average identity within HSPs was 100.0%, whereas the average coverage by HSPs was 95.6%. Among all other species, the one yielding the highest score was Hydrogenimonas thermophila, which corresponded to an identity of 88.5% and an HSP coverage of 67.2%. (Note that the Greengenes database uses the INSDC (= EMBL/NCBI/DDBJ) annotation, which is not an authoritative source for nomenclature or classification.) The highest-scoring environmental sequence was AF420348 ('hydrothermal sediment clone AF420348') [5], which showed an identity of 96.7% and an HSP coverage of 97.8%. The five most frequent keywords within the labels of environmental samples which yielded hits were 'cave' (7.2%), 'biofilm' (5.7%), 'sulfid' (5.3%), 'spring' (4.8%) and 'structur' (3.1%) (239 hits in total). The five most frequent keywords within the labels of environmental samples which yielded hits of a higher score than the highest scoring species were 'hydrotherm' (8.6%), 'vent' (7.5%), 'pacif' (4.0%), 'microbi' (3.7%) and 'mat' (3.0%) (37 hits in total). These keywords are in accordance with the origin of the strain N. salsuginis E9I37-1T from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimney at the summits of the sulfide mounds in the sediment-hosted back-arc hydrothermal system Iheya North [1,2]. The 16S rRNA based tree in Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic neighborhood of N. salsuginis E9I37-1T. The sequences of the two identical 16S rRNA gene copies in the genome do not differ from the previously published 16S rRNA sequence (AB175500).
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of N. salsuginis strain E9I37-1T relative to the other type strains within the family Nautiliaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,356 aligned characters [6,7] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [8] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers to the right of bifurcations are support values from 200 bootstrap replicates [9] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [10] are labeled with an asterisk when unpublished, and with two asterisks when published [11]. The closest BLAST hit to N. salsuginis (see above) does not belong to Nautiliaceae, and this family does not appear as monophyletic in the last version of the 16S rRNA phylogeny from the All-Species-Living-Tree Project [12]. The species selection for Figure 1 was based on the current taxonomic classification (Table 1). However, an analysis including the type strains of Nautiliaceae and its neighboring families Campylobacteraceae, Helicobacteraceae and Hydrogenimonaceae (data not shown) did not provide evidence for the non-monophyly for any of these families.

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of N. salsuginis strain E9I37-1T relative to the other type strains within the family Nautiliaceae. The tree was inferred from 1,356 aligned characters [6,7] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood criterion [8] and rooted in accordance with the current taxonomy. The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers to the right of bifurcations are support values from 200 bootstrap replicates [9] if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [10] are labeled with an asterisk when unpublished, and with two asterisks when published [11]. The closest BLAST hit to N. salsuginis (see above) does not belong to Nautiliaceae, and this family does not appear as monophyletic in the last version of the 16S rRNA phylogeny from the All-Species-Living-Tree Project [12]. The species selection for Figure 1 was based on the current taxonomic classification (Table 1). However, an analysis including the type strains of Nautiliaceae and its neighboring families Campylobacteraceae, Helicobacteraceae and Hydrogenimonaceae (data not shown) did not provide evidence for the non-monophyly for any of these families.
Table 1

Classification and general features of N. salsuginis E9I37-1T according to the MIGS recommendations [13].

MIGS ID    Property    Term     Evidence code
    Current classification    Domain Bacteria     TAS [14]
    Phylum Proteobacteria     TAS [15]
    Class Epsilonproteobacteria     TAS [16,17]
    Order Nautiliales     TAS [18]
    Family Nautiliaceae     TAS [18]
    Genus Nitratifractor     TAS [1]
    Species Nitratifractor salsuginis     TAS [1]
    Type strain E9I37-1     TAS [1]
    Gram stain    negative     TAS [1]
    Cell shape    rod shaped, occurring singly or in pairs     TAS [1]
    Motility    non-motile     TAS [1]
    Sporulation    none     TAS [1]
    Temperature range    28-40ºC     TAS [1]
    Optimum temperature    37°C     TAS [1]
    Salinity    1.5-3.5% NaCl     TAS [1]
MIGS-22    Oxygen requirement    anaerobic and microaerobic     TAS [1]
    Carbon source    probably CO2     NAS
    Energy metabolism    strictly chemolithoautotrophic     TAS [1]
MIGS-6    Habitat    deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimneys     TAS [1]
MIGS-15    Biotic relationship    not reported     NAS
MIGS-14    Pathogenicity    not reported     NAS
    Biosafety level    1     TAS [19]
    Isolation    deep-sea hydrothermal vent water of ‘E9’ chimney (inside part)     TAS [1,2]
MIGS-4    Geographic location    Iheya North hydrothermal field in the Mid-Okinawa Trough in Japan     TAS [1,2]
MIGS-5    Sample collection time    2002 or before     TAS [1,2]
MIGS-4.1    Latitude    27.78     TAS [1,2]
MIGS-4.2    Longitude    126.88     TAS [1,2]
MIGS-4.3    Depth    984 m     TAS [1,2]
MIGS-4.4    Altitude    not reported     NAS

Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [20]. If the evidence code is IDA, the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

The cells of strain E9I37-1T are generally rod-shaped of 2.5 µm in length and 0.6 µm in width (Figure 2) and usually occur singly or in pairs (Figure 2) [1]. Strain E9I37-1T is a Gram-negative, non-motile and non spore-forming bacterium (Table 1). The organism is anaerobic to microaerophilic (0.09-0.55% O2 (v/v)) and chemolithoautotrophic, growing by respiratory nitrate reduction with H2 as the electron donor, forming N2 as a metabolic end product [1]. The main electron acceptors are NO3- or O2 [1]. Strain E9I37-1T uses S0 as a source of sulfur [1]. The doubling time of strain E9I37-1T was about 2.5 h [1]. The NaCl range for growth is between 1.5% and 3.5%, with an optimum at 3%; no growth was observed below 1.0% NaCl or above 4.0% NaCl [1]. The temperature range for growth is between 28ºC and 40ºC, with an optimum at 37ºC [1]. The pH range for growth is between 5.6 and 7.6, with an optimum at pH 7; no growth could be detected below pH 5.2 or above pH 8.1 [1]. Strain E9I37-1T was unable to use any organic compounds as energy or carbon sources [1]. The organism was sensitive to ampicillin, rifampicin, streptomycin, chloramphenicol (each at 50 µg ml-l) and kanamycin (200 µg ml-1), and insensitive to approximately 150 µg ml-1 kanamycin [1]. Enzymatic and genetic analyses demonstrated that strain E9I37-1T uses the reductive TCA (rTCA) cycle for carbon assimilation [21]. This was confirmed by the presence of all genes encoding the three key rTCA cycle enzymatic activities, namely ATP-dependent citrate lyase, pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase, and 2-oxoglutarate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase [21], but it was found to lack the gene for ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (RubisCO) activity, the key enzyme in the Calvin-Benson cycle [21].
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of N. salsuginis E9I37-1T

Scanning electron micrograph of N. salsuginis E9I37-1T Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay (first time in publication); TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from of the Gene Ontology project [20]. If the evidence code is IDA, the property was directly observed by one of the authors or an expert mentioned in the acknowledgements.

Chemotaxonomy

The major cellular fatty acids of strain E9I37-1Tare C18:1 (42.3% of the total fatty acid), C16:1 (30.7%) and C16:0 (24.3%), C14:0 3-OH (1.1%), C14:0 (0.9%) and C18:0 (0.7%) [1]. It should be noted that no information is given on the position of double bonds in the unsaturated fatty acids. No attempt has been made to examine the type strain for the presence of respiratory lipoquinones or to determine the polar lipid composition.

Genome sequencing and annotation

Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position [22], and is part of the enomic ncyclopedia of acteria and rchaea project [23]. The genome project is deposited in the Genome On Line Database [10] and the complete genome sequence is deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Genome sequencing project information

MIGS ID    Property   Term
MIGS-31    Finishing quality   Finished
MIGS-28    Libraries used   Three genomic libraries: one 454 pyrosequence standard library,   one 454 PE library (12 kb insert size), one Illumina library
MIGS-29    Sequencing platforms   Illumina GAii, 454 GS FLX Titanium
MIGS-31.2    Sequencing coverage   75.2 × Illumina; 31.5 × pyrosequence
MIGS-30    Assemblers   Newbler version 2.4, Velvet, phrap
MIGS-32    Gene calling method   Prodigal 1.4, GenePRIMP
    INSDC ID   CP002452
    Genbank Date of Release   January 24, 2011
    GOLD ID   Gc01594
    NCBI project ID   46883
    Database: IMG-GEBA   2503538035
MIGS-13    Source material identifier   DSM 16511
    Project relevance   Tree of Life, GEBA

Growth conditions and DNA isolation

N. salsuginis E9I37-1T, DSM 16511, was grown anaerobically in DSMZ medium 1024 (Nitratiruptor and Nitratifractor medium) [24] at 37°C. DNA was isolated from 0.5-1 g of cell paste using Jetflex Genomic DNA Purification Kit (GENOMED 600100) following the standard protocol as recommended by the manufacturer. Cell lysis was enhanced by adding 20 µl proteinase K for two hours at 58°C. DNA is available through the DNA Bank Network [25].

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome was sequenced using a combination of Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms. All general aspects of library construction and sequencing can be found at the JGI website [26]. Pyrosequencing reads were assembled using the Newbler assembler (Roche). The initial Newbler assembly consisting of 42 contigs in five scaffolds was converted into a phrap [27] assembly by making fake reads from the consensus, to collect the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. Illumina GAii sequencing data (158.03 Mb) was assembled with Velvet [28] and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data. The 454 draft assembly was based on 60.3 Mb 454 draft data and all of the 454 paired end data. Newbler parameters are -consed -a 50 -l 350 -g -m -ml 20. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package [27] was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment in the subsequent finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution [26], Dupfinisher [29], or sequencing clones bridging PCR fragments with subcloning. Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks (J.-F. Chang, unpublished). A total of 135 additional reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence. Illumina reads were also used to correct potential base errors and increase consensus quality using a software Polisher developed at JGI [30]. The error rate of the completed genome sequence is less than 1 in 100,000. Together, the combination of the Illumina and 454 sequencing platforms provided 106.7 × coverage of the genome. The final assembly contained 274,574 pyrosequence and 2,079,398 Illumina reads.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [31] as part of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory genome annotation pipeline, followed by a round of manual curation using the JGI GenePRIMP pipeline [32]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) non-redundant database, UniProt, TIGR-Fam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. Additional gene prediction analysis and functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes - Expert Review (IMG-ER) platform [33].

Genome properties

The genome consists of a 2,101,285 bp long chromosome with a G+C content of 53.9% (Table 3 and Figure 3). Of the 2,175 genes predicted, 2,121 were protein-coding genes, and 54 RNAs; 33 pseudogenes were also identified. The majority of the protein-coding genes (66.9%) were assigned with a putative function while the remaining ones were annotated as hypothetical proteins. The distribution of genes into COGs functional categories is presented in Table 4.
Table 3

Genome Statistics

AttributeValue    % of Total
Genome size (bp)   2,101,285    100.00%
DNA coding region (bp)1,916,093    91.19%
DNA G+C content (bp)1,132,843    53.91%
Number of replicons1
Extrachromosomal elements0
Total genes2,175    100.00%
RNA genes54    2.48%
rRNA operons2
Protein-coding genes2,121    97.52%
Pseudo genes33    1.52%
Genes with function prediction1,456    66.94%
Genes in paralog clusters144    6.62%
Genes assigned to COGs1,525    70.11%
Genes assigned Pfam domains1,616    74.30%
Genes with signal peptides411    18.90%
Genes with transmembrane helices501    23.03%
CRISPR repeats2
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the chromosome; From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories

Code    value    %age   Description
J    149    9.0   Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis
A    0    0.0   RNA processing and modification
K    64    3.9   Transcription
L    114    6.9   Replication, recombination and repair
B    0    0.0   Chromatin structure and dynamics
D    20    1.2   Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning
Y    0    0.0   Nuclear structure
V    25    1.5   Defense mechanisms
T    69    4.2   Signal transduction mechanisms
M    133    8.1   Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis
N    15    0.9   Cell motility
Z    0    0.0   Cytoskeleton
W    0    0.0   Extracellular structures
U    43    2.6   Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport
O    89    5.4   Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C    131    8.0   Energy production and conversion
G    58    3.5   Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E    136    8.3   Amino acid transport and metabolism
F    50    3.0   Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H    97    5.9   Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I    37    2.3   Lipid transport and metabolism
P    81    4.9   Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q    18    1.1   Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R    183    11.1   General function prediction only
S    136    8.3   Function unknown
-    650    29.9   Not in COGs
Graphical circular map of the chromosome; From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories), Genes on reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, GC skew.
  24 in total

1.  Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  J Castresana
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium.

Authors:  M Ashburner; C A Ball; J A Blake; D Botstein; H Butler; J M Cherry; A P Davis; K Dolinski; S S Dwight; J T Eppig; M A Harris; D P Hill; L Issel-Tarver; A Kasarskis; S Lewis; J C Matese; J E Richardson; M Ringwald; G M Rubin; G Sherlock
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs.

Authors:  Christopher Lee; Catherine Grasso; Mark F Sharlow
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Amrita Pati; Natalia N Ivanova; Natalia Mikhailova; Galina Ovchinnikova; Sean D Hooper; Athanasios Lykidis; Nikos C Kyrpides
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 5.  En route to a genome-based classification of Archaea and Bacteria?

Authors:  H-P Klenk; M Göker
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.022

6.  Enzymatic and genetic characterization of carbon and energy metabolisms by deep-sea hydrothermal chemolithoautotrophic isolates of Epsilonproteobacteria.

Authors:  Ken Takai; Barbara J Campbell; S Craig Cary; Masae Suzuki; Hanako Oida; Takuro Nunoura; Hisako Hirayama; Satoshi Nakagawa; Yohey Suzuki; Fumio Inagaki; Koki Horikoshi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis; Paul Hoover; Jacques Rougemont
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 15.683

8.  The DNA bank network: the start from a german initiative.

Authors:  Birgit Gemeinholzer; Gabriele Dröge; Holger Zetzsche; Gerhard Haszprunar; Hans-Peter Klenk; Anton Güntsch; Walter G Berendsohn; Johann-Wolfgang Wägele
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification.

Authors:  Doug Hyatt; Gwo-Liang Chen; Philip F Locascio; Miriam L Land; Frank W Larimer; Loren J Hauser
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Adaptations to submarine hydrothermal environments exemplified by the genome of Nautilia profundicola.

Authors:  Barbara J Campbell; Julie L Smith; Thomas E Hanson; Martin G Klotz; Lisa Y Stein; Charles K Lee; Dongying Wu; Jeffrey M Robinson; Hoda M Khouri; Jonathan A Eisen; S Craig Cary
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  7 in total

1.  Genome sequence of a novel deep-sea vent epsilonproteobacterial phage provides new insight into the co-evolution of Epsilonproteobacteria and their phages.

Authors:  Yukari Yoshida-Takashima; Yoshihiro Takaki; Shigeru Shimamura; Takuro Nunoura; Ken Takai
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Strain-level genomic variation in natural populations of Lebetimonas from an erupting deep-sea volcano.

Authors:  Julie L Meyer; Julie A Huber
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Complete genome sequence of the sulfur compounds oxidizing chemolithoautotroph Sulfuricurvum kujiense type strain (YK-1(T)).

Authors:  Cliff Han; Oleg Kotsyurbenko; Olga Chertkov; Brittany Held; Alla Lapidus; Matt Nolan; Susan Lucas; Nancy Hammon; Shweta Deshpande; Jan-Fang Cheng; Roxanne Tapia; Lynne A Goodwin; Sam Pitluck; Konstantinos Liolios; Ioanna Pagani; Natalia Ivanova; Konstantinos Mavromatis; Natalia Mikhailova; Amrita Pati; Amy Chen; Krishna Palaniappan; Miriam Land; Loren Hauser; Yun-Juan Chang; Cynthia D Jeffries; Evelyne-Marie Brambilla; Manfred Rohde; Stefan Spring; Johannes Sikorski; Markus Göker; Tanja Woyke; James Bristow; Jonathan A Eisen; Victor Markowitz; Philip Hugenholtz; Nikos C Kyrpides; Hans-Peter Klenk; John C Detter
Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci       Date:  2012-03-05

4.  Pan-genome analyses identify lineage- and niche-specific markers of evolution and adaptation in Epsilonproteobacteria.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Stefan M Sievert
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Comparative Genomic Analysis of the Class Epsilonproteobacteria and Proposed Reclassification to Epsilonbacteraeota (phyl. nov.).

Authors:  David W Waite; Inka Vanwonterghem; Christian Rinke; Donovan H Parks; Ying Zhang; Ken Takai; Stefan M Sievert; Jörg Simon; Barbara J Campbell; Thomas E Hanson; Tanja Woyke; Martin G Klotz; Philip Hugenholtz
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Horizontal acquisition of hydrogen conversion ability and other habitat adaptations in the Hydrogenovibrio strains SP-41 and XCL-2.

Authors:  Giorgio Gonnella; Nicole Adam; Mirjam Perner
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  A catalogue of biochemically diverse CRISPR-Cas9 orthologs.

Authors:  Giedrius Gasiunas; Joshua K Young; Tautvydas Karvelis; Darius Kazlauskas; Tomas Urbaitis; Monika Jasnauskaite; Mantvyda M Grusyte; Sushmitha Paulraj; Po-Hao Wang; Zhenglin Hou; Shane K Dooley; Mark Cigan; Clara Alarcon; N Doane Chilcoat; Greta Bigelyte; Jennifer L Curcuru; Megumu Mabuchi; Zhiyi Sun; Ryan T Fuchs; Ezra Schildkraut; Peter R Weigele; William E Jack; G Brett Robb; Česlovas Venclovas; Virginijus Siksnys
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.