| Literature DB >> 21886847 |
Mai-Juan Ma1, Hai-Bing Wang, Hao Li, Jun-Hai Yang, Yan Yan, Lan-Pin Xie, Ying-Cheng Qi, Jun-Lian Li, Mei-Juan Chen, Wei Liu, Wu-Chun Cao.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Susceptibility to tuberculosis is not only determined by Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, but also by the genetic component of the host. Macrophage receptor with a collagenous structure (MARCO) is essential components required for toll like receptor-signaling in macrophage response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which may contribute to tuberculosis risk. PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21886847 PMCID: PMC3160327 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024069
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The demographic characteristics of study population.
| Characteristics | Patients | Controls |
|
|
| 0.700 | ||
| Female | 314(34.0) | 360(34.8) | |
| Male | 609(66.0) | 673(65.2) | |
|
| 36.4(16.7) | 37.6(13.5) | 0.090 |
|
| 0.075 | ||
| Smoking | 200(21.7) | 189(18.3) | |
| Nonsmoking | 681(73.8) | 781(75.6) | |
| Ever smoking | 42(4.5) | 63(6.1) | |
| BCG vaccination | 0.078 | ||
| Yes | 185(20.0) | 248(24.0) | |
| No | 669(72.4) | 738(68.5) | |
| Uncertain | 69(7.6) | 77(7.5) | |
|
| |||
| Positive | 498(54.0) | ND | |
| Strong positive | 332(36.0) | ND | |
| Negative | 44(4.7) | ND | |
| ND | 49(5.3) | ND | |
|
| |||
| Pulmonary tuberculosis | 923 | ||
| culture positive | 389 (42.1) | ND | |
| Smear positive | 294 (31.9) | ND | |
| Culture/smear positive | 240 (26.0) | ND |
Data are presented as n (%) or Mean (SD), unless otherwise stated. ND: Tuberculin skin test was not determined.
*p value was calculated by BCG vaccination status (yes and no) between two groups.
Associations between MARCO gene allele frequencies and tuberculosis in Chinese Han population.
| rs# | Alleles | MA | Case | Control |
|
|
|
| G/A | A | 0.153 | 0.151 | 0.842 | |
|
| C/G | G | 0.340 | 0.359 | 0.213 | |
|
| C/T | T | 0.350 | 0.367 | 0.286 | |
|
| T/G | G | 0.203 | 0.210 | 0.593 | |
|
| C/T | T | 0.214 | 0.224 | 0.467 | |
|
| A/G | G | 0.139 | 0.092 | 3.52E-6 |
|
|
| C/T | T | 0.247 | 0.258 | 0.451 | |
|
| T/A | A | 0.199 | 0.221 | 0.086 | |
|
| G/T | T | 0.115 | 0.131 | 0.134 | |
|
| T/C | C | 0.163 | 0.133 | 0.0083 | 0.116 |
|
| C/T | T | 0.034 | 0.033 | 0.907 | |
|
| G/T | T | 0.045 | 0.041 | 0.556 | |
|
| C/T | T | 0.247 | 0.264 | 0.181 | |
|
| T/C | C | 0.146 | 0.137 | 0.459 | |
|
| C/T | T | 0.279 | 0.251 | ND | |
|
| A/G | G | 0.468 | 0.471 | ND | |
|
| T/C | C | 0.404 | 0.414 | ND |
Data are presented as minor allele frequency, unless otherwise stated. MA: minor allele; HW: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval; ND: p value was not determined due to the probability for deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in controls and cases.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis of rs17009726A/G genotype in pulmonary tuberculosis cases and controls.
| Model | Genotype | Case | Control | OR (95% CI) |
|
|
| Cod | AA | 0.743 | 0.827 | 1.00 | ||
| AG | 0.235 | 0.163 | 1.61(1.28–2.01) |
|
| |
| GG | 0.022 | 0.011 | 2.26(1.08–4.76) |
| 0.434 | |
| Dom | AA | 0.743 | 0.827 | 1.00 | ||
| AG-GG | 0.257 | 0.173 | 1.65(1.32–2.05) |
|
| |
| Rec | AA-AG | 0.978 | 0.989 | 1.00 | ||
| GG | 0.022 | 0.011 | 2.06(0.98–4.32) | 0.051 | 0.714 | |
| Add | 1.57 (1.29–1.92) | 7.86E-6 |
|
Data are presented as frequency of genotype, unless otherwise stated; Cod: codominant model; Dom: dominant model; Rec: recessive model; Add: additive model; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.
Figure 1Linkage disequilibrium (LD) map of SNPs.
(a) LD map based on D-prime (D’); (b) LD map based on R-squared (R2); (c) haplotypes of SNPs in the “blocks”.
MARCO haplotypes analysis in pulmonary tuberculosis cases and controls.
| Haplotype | Case | Control |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| 0.771(1423.6) | 0.772(1594.5) | 0.964 | 1.000 |
|
| 0.188(347.6) | 0.205(424.5) | 0.178 | 0.870 |
|
| 0.026(47.4) | 0.018(37.5) | 0.106 | 0.728 |
|
| ||||
|
| 0.617(1139.3) | 0.654(1350.3) | 0.018 | 0.199 |
|
| 0.244(449.7) | 0.254(525.7) | 0.435 | 0.998 |
|
| 0.136(250.7) | 0.089(183.7) |
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| 0.527(973.6) | 0.534(1103.5) | 0.674 | 1.000 |
|
| 0.189(348.2) | 0.205(424.1) | 0.192 | 0.904 |
|
| 0.148(272.7) | 0.114(235.3) |
|
|
|
| 0.084(155.5) | 0.090(186.5) | 0.506 | 0.999 |
|
| 0.020(36.6) | 0.029(59.9) | 0.065 | 0.536 |
|
| ||||
|
| 0.569(1048.5) | 0.563(1162.5) | 0.711 | 1.000 |
|
| 0.242(446.5) | 0.259(534.5) | 0.234 | 0.941 |
|
| 0.144(265.6) | 0.136(281.4) | 0.479 | 0.999 |
|
| 0.040(73.9) | 0.035(73.1) | 0.443 | 0.998 |
Data are presented as frequency of haplotype (n), unless otherwise stated.
*p value obtained from haplotype analysis after the 100,000 permutations testing.