Literature DB >> 21885156

Development of a clinical prediction rule for 30-day cardiac events in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome.

Erik P Hess1, Robert J Brison, Jeffrey J Perry, Lisa A Calder, Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Dipti Agarwal, Annie T Sadosty, Marco L A Silvilotti, Allan S Jaffe, Victor M Montori, George A Wells, Ian G Stiell.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain who are at low risk for acute coronary syndrome is resource intensive and may lead to false-positive test results and unnecessary downstream procedures. We seek to identify patients at low short-term risk for a cardiac event for whom additional ED investigations might be unnecessary.
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients older than 24 years and with a primary complaint of chest pain from 3 academic EDs. Physicians completed standardized data collection forms before diagnostic testing. The primary adjudicated outcome was acute myocardial infarction, revascularization, or death of cardiac or unknown cause within 30 days. We used recursive partitioning to derive the rule and validated the model with 5,000 bootstrap replications.
RESULTS: Of 2,718 patients enrolled, 336 (12%) experienced a cardiac event within 30 days (6% acute myocardial infarction, 10% revascularization, 0.2% death). We developed a rule consisting of the absence of 5 predictors: ischemic ECG changes not known to be old, history of coronary artery disease, pain typical for acute coronary syndrome, initial or 6-hour troponin level greater than the 99th percentile, and age greater than 50 years. Patients aged 40 years or younger required only a single troponin evaluation. The rule was 100% sensitive (95% confidence interval 97.2% to 100.0%) and 20.9% specific (95% confidence interval 16.9% to 24.9%) for a cardiac event within 30 days.
CONCLUSION: This clinical prediction rule identifies ED chest pain patients at very low risk for a cardiac event who may be suitable for discharge. A prospective multicenter study is needed to validate the rule and determine its effect on practice.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21885156     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.07.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  33 in total

1.  Acute chest pain evaluation: is there too much stress on the system?

Authors:  Michael C Kontos; J Douglas Kirk
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Performance of the 2-hour accelerated diagnostic protocol within the American College of Radiology Imaging Network PA 4005 cohort.

Authors:  Simon A Mahler; Chadwick D Miller; Harold I Litt; Constantine A Gatsonis; Bradley S Snyder; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.451

3.  Identifying patients for early discharge: performance of decision rules among patients with acute chest pain.

Authors:  Simon A Mahler; Chadwick D Miller; Judd E Hollander; John T Nagurney; Robert Birkhahn; Adam J Singer; Nathan I Shapiro; Ted Glynn; Richard Nowak; Basmah Safdar; Mary Peberdy; Francis L Counselman; Abhinav Chandra; Joshua Kosowsky; James Neuenschwander; Jon W Schrock; Stephen Plantholt; Deborah B Diercks; W Frank Peacock
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  An external validation of the HEART pathway among Emergency Department patients with chest pain.

Authors:  Joshua James Oliver; Matthew Jay Streitz; Jessica Marie Hyams; Richard Michael Wood; Yevgeniy Mikhaylovich Maksimenko; Brit Long; Robert Michael Barnwell; Michael David April
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  Relationship between body mass index and prognosis of patients presenting with potential acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Jon Dooley; Anna Marie Chang; Rama A Salhi; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Implementation of a Risk Stratification and Management Pathway for Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Christopher W Baugh; Jeffrey O Greenberg; Simon A Mahler; Joshua M Kosowsky; Jeremiah D Schuur; Siddharth Parmar; George R Ciociolo; Christina W Carr; Roya Ghazinouri; Benjamin M Scirica
Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol       Date:  2016-12

7.  Cholesteryl esters associated with acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase predict coronary artery disease in patients with symptoms of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Chadwick D Miller; Michael J Thomas; Brian Hiestand; Michael P Samuel; Martha D Wilson; Janet Sawyer; Lawrence L Rudel
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Impact of clinical predictors and routine coronary artery disease testing on outcome of patients admitted to chest pain decision unit.

Authors:  Vlad Cotarlan; David Ho; John Pineda; Anwer Qureshi; Jamshid Shirani
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 2.882

9.  Repeated Emergency Medical Services Use by Older Adults: Analysis of a Comprehensive Statewide Database.

Authors:  Christopher S Evans; Timothy F Platts-Mills; Antonio R Fernandez; Joseph M Grover; Jose G Cabanas; Mehul D Patel; Gary M Vilke; Jane H Brice
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 10.  Asking the Patient or Measuring Blood Pressure in the Emergency Department: Which One is Best?

Authors:  Per H Skoglund; Per Svensson
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.