Literature DB >> 21884679

Manipulating the genetic code for membrane protein production: what have we learnt so far?

Morten H H Nørholm1, Sara Light, Minttu T I Virkki, Arne Elofsson, Gunnar von Heijne, Daniel O Daley.   

Abstract

With synthetic gene services, molecular cloning is as easy as ordering a pizza. However choosing the right RNA code for efficient protein production is less straightforward, more akin to deciding on the pizza toppings. The possibility to choose synonymous codons in the gene sequence has ignited a discussion that dates back 50 years: Does synonymous codon use matter? Recent studies indicate that replacement of particular codons for synonymous codons can improve expression in homologous or heterologous hosts, however it is not always successful. Furthermore it is increasingly apparent that membrane protein biogenesis can be codon-sensitive. Single synonymous codon substitutions can influence mRNA stability, mRNA structure, translational initiation, translational elongation and even protein folding. Synonymous codon substitutions therefore need to be carefully evaluated when membrane proteins are engineered for higher production levels and further studies are needed to fully understand how to select the codons that are optimal for higher production. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Protein Folding in Membranes. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21884679      PMCID: PMC3288168          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  68 in total

1.  Codon optimization of Caenorhabditis elegans GluCl ion channel genes for mammalian cells dramatically improves expression levels.

Authors:  Eric M Slimko; Henry A Lester
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2003-03-30       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 2.  Codon bias and heterologous protein expression.

Authors:  Claes Gustafsson; Sridhar Govindarajan; Jeremy Minshull
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 19.536

3.  Solving the riddle of codon usage preferences: a test for translational selection.

Authors:  Mario dos Reis; Renos Savva; Lorenz Wernisch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-09-24       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  [Measurement of relative amount of E. coli tRNAs: codon choice in E. coli genes is largely constrained by the concentration of anticodons (author's transl)].

Authors:  T Ikemura
Journal:  Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso       Date:  1980

5.  Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes.

Authors:  T Ikemura
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1981-02-15       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Over-expression of Escherichia coli F1F(o)-ATPase subunit a is inhibited by instability of the uncB gene transcript.

Authors:  Ignacio Arechaga; Bruno Miroux; Mike J Runswick; John E Walker
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 4.124

7.  Water, protein folding, and the genetic code.

Authors:  R V Wolfenden; P M Cullis; C C Southgate
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-11-02       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Nonrandom intragenic variations in patterns of codon bias implicate a sequential interplay between transitional genetic drift and functional amino acid selection.

Authors:  K Lin; S B Tan; P R Kolatkar; R J Epstein
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Structure-based analysis of GPCR function: conformational adaptation of both agonist and receptor upon leukotriene B4 binding to recombinant BLT1.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Baneres; Aimée Martin; Pierre Hullot; Jean-Pierre Girard; Jean-Claude Rossi; Joseph Parello
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Synonymous mutations in the human dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) affect mRNA stability and synthesis of the receptor.

Authors:  Jubao Duan; Mark S Wainwright; Josep M Comeron; Naruya Saitou; Alan R Sanders; Joel Gelernter; Pablo V Gejman
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.150

View more
  8 in total

1.  Preparation of a Deuterated Membrane Protein for Small-Angle Neutron Scattering.

Authors:  Yuqi Wu; Kevin L Weiss; Raquel L Lieberman
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 2.  Dynamics of Co-translational Membrane Protein Integration and Translocation via the Sec Translocon.

Authors:  Michiel J M Niesen; Matthew H Zimmer; Thomas F Miller
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Side effects of extra tRNA supplied in a typical bacterial protein production scenario.

Authors:  Karina Marie Søgaard; Morten H H Nørholm
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  A statistical model for improved membrane protein expression using sequence-derived features.

Authors:  Shyam M Saladi; Nauman Javed; Axel Müller; William M Clemons
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  mRNA-programmed translation pauses in the targeting of E. coli membrane proteins.

Authors:  Nir Fluman; Sivan Navon; Eitan Bibi; Yitzhak Pilpel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 6.  Optogenetic Monitoring of Synaptic Activity with Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicators.

Authors:  Ryuichi Nakajima; Arong Jung; Bong-June Yoon; Bradley J Baker
Journal:  Front Synaptic Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-05

7.  Improving heterologous membrane protein production in Escherichia coli by combining transcriptional tuning and codon usage algorithms.

Authors:  Nico J Claassens; Melvin F Siliakus; Sebastiaan K Spaans; Sjoerd C A Creutzburg; Bart Nijsse; Peter J Schaap; Tessa E F Quax; John van der Oost
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evolutionary analysis of polyproline motifs in Escherichia coli reveals their regulatory role in translation.

Authors:  Fei Qi; Magdalena Motz; Kirsten Jung; Jürgen Lassak; Dmitrij Frishman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.475

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.