Literature DB >> 21884556

Moral distress and ethical climate in a Swedish nursing context: perceptions and instrument usability.

Marit Silén1, Mia Svantesson, Sofia Kjellström, Birgitta Sidenvall, Lennart Christensson.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: The aim was fivefold: to describe Swedish nurses' perceptions of moral distress and determine whether there were differences in perceptions depending on demographic characteristics and to describe the usability of the Moral Distress Scale in a Swedish context. Further, the aim was to describe Swedish nurses' perceptions of ethical climate and the relationship between moral distress and ethical climate.
BACKGROUND: Moral distress has been studied for more than two decades and the Moral Distress Scale is the most widely used instrument for measuring it. Moral distress has mainly been studied in relation to nurses' characteristics, but increasing attention has been paid to contextual aspects, such as ethical climate, that could be associated with moral distress.
DESIGN: Descriptive, with a quantitative approach.
METHODS: The study used two questionnaires: the Moral Distress Scale and the Hospital Ethical Climate Survey. The study was carried out at two hospitals in Sweden and included 249 nurses.
RESULTS: Both level and frequency of moral distress were low, however level of moral distress was high in situations when the patient was not given safe and proper care. Generally, the frequency of moral distress was lower than the level. Of the situations on the Moral Distress Scale, 13 of the 32 were considered irrelevant by 10-50% of the participants. The more positive the ethical climate was perceived to be, the less frequently morally distressing situations were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Since a positive ethical climate was associated with less frequent occurrences of moral distress, it should be investigated what contributes to a positive ethical climate. To be used in a Swedish context, the Moral Distress Scale needs further revision. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Open dialogues at wards are encouraged regarding what practices contribute to a positive ethical climate.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21884556     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03753.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  19 in total

1.  Implicit and explicit clinical ethics support in The Netherlands: a mixed methods overview study.

Authors:  Linda Dauwerse; Froukje Weidema; Tineke Abma; Bert Molewijk; Guy Widdershoven
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2014-06

2.  Outcomes of moral case deliberation--the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD).

Authors:  Mia Svantesson; Jan Karlsson; Pierre Boitte; Jan Schildman; Linda Dauwerse; Guy Widdershoven; Reidar Pedersen; Martijn Huisman; Bert Molewijk
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the "Hospital Ethical Climate Survey".

Authors:  Nader Khalesi; Jalal Arabloo; Omid Khosravizadeh; Sanaz Taghizadeh; Ali Heyrani; Abbasali Ebrahimian
Journal:  J Med Ethics Hist Med       Date:  2014-09-11

4.  Moral distress in physicians practicing in hospitals affiliated to medical sciences universities.

Authors:  Mahmoud Abbasi; Nasrin Nejadsarvari; Mehrzad Kiani; Fariba Borhani; Shabnam Bazmi; Saeid Nazari Tavaokkoli; Hamidreza Rasouli
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 0.611

5.  Professionalism dilemmas, moral distress and the healthcare student: insights from two online UK-wide questionnaire studies.

Authors:  Lynn V Monrouxe; Charlotte E Rees; Ian Dennis; Stephanie E Wells
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  To change or not to change - translating and culturally adapting the paediatric version of the Moral Distress Scale-Revised (MDS-R).

Authors:  Margareta Af Sandeberg; Marika Wenemark; Cecilia Bartholdson; Kim Lützén; Pernilla Pergert
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Validation of a moral distress instrument in nurses of primary health care.

Authors:  Priscila Orlandi Barth; Flávia Regina Souza Ramos; Edison Luiz Devos Barlem; Graziele de Lima Dalmolin; Dulcinéia Ghizoni Schneider
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2018-05-17

8.  What is "moral distress" in nursing? How, can and should we respond to it?

Authors:  Georgina Morley
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.036

9.  Perceived organizational support and moral distress among nurses.

Authors:  Navideh Robaee; Foroozan Atashzadeh-Shoorideh; Tahereh Ashktorab; Ahmadreza Baghestani; Maasoumeh Barkhordari-Sharifabad
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2018-01-10

10.  What is 'moral distress'? A narrative synthesis of the literature.

Authors:  Georgina Morley; Jonathan Ives; Caroline Bradbury-Jones; Fiona Irvine
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2017-10-08       Impact factor: 2.874

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.