Literature DB >> 21884067

Nonadaptive evolution of mitochondrial genome size.

Bastien Boussau1, Jeremy M Brown, Matthew K Fujita.   

Abstract

Genomes vary greatly in size and complexity, and identifying the evolutionary forces that have generated this variation remains a major goal in biology. A controversial proposal is that most changes in genome size are initially deleterious and therefore are linked to episodes of decrease in effective population sizes. Support for this hypothesis comes from large-scale comparative analyses, but vanishes when phylogenetic nonindependence is taken into account. Another approach to test this hypothesis involves analyzing sequence evolution among clades where duplications have recently fixed. Here we show that episodes of fixation of duplications in mitochondrial genomes of the gecko Heteronotia binoei (two independent clades) and of mantellid frogs (five distinct branches) coincide with reductions in the ability of selection to purge slightly deleterious mutations. Our results support the idea that genome complexity can arise through nonadaptive processes in tetrapods.
© 2011 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21884067     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01322.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  12 in total

1.  Evolution of an ancient microsatellite hotspot in the conifer mitochondrial genome and comparison with other plants.

Authors:  Juan P Jaramillo-Correa; Erika Aguirre-Planter; Luis E Eguiarte; Damase P Khasa; Jean Bousquet
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 2.  Reductive genome evolution at both ends of the bacterial population size spectrum.

Authors:  Bérénice Batut; Carole Knibbe; Gabriel Marais; Vincent Daubin
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Genome expansion via lineage splitting and genome reduction in the cicada endosymbiont Hodgkinia.

Authors:  Matthew A Campbell; James T Van Leuven; Russell C Meister; Kaitlin M Carey; Chris Simon; John P McCutcheon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Rapid evolution of enormous, multichromosomal genomes in flowering plant mitochondria with exceptionally high mutation rates.

Authors:  Daniel B Sloan; Andrew J Alverson; John P Chuckalovcak; Martin Wu; David E McCauley; Jeffrey D Palmer; Douglas R Taylor
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  The evolution of mitochondrial genomes in modern frogs (Neobatrachia): nonadaptive evolution of mitochondrial genome reorganization.

Authors:  Yun Xia; Yuchi Zheng; Ikuo Miura; Pamela B Y Wong; Robert W Murphy; Xiaomao Zeng
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Intraspecific rearrangement of mitochondrial genome suggests the prevalence of the tandem duplication-random loss (TDLR) mechanism in Quasipaa boulengeri.

Authors:  Yun Xia; Yuchi Zheng; Robert W Murphy; Xiaomao Zeng
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Genetic Drift and Indel Mutation in the Evolution of Yeast Mitochondrial Genome Size.

Authors:  Shujie Xiao; Duong T Nguyen; Baojun Wu; Weilong Hao
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.416

8.  Evolution along the mutation gradient in the dynamic mitochondrial genome of salamanders.

Authors:  Rebecca A Chong; Rachel Lockridge Mueller
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

9.  Association of intron loss with high mutation rate in Arabidopsis: implications for genome size evolution.

Authors:  Yu-Fei Yang; Tao Zhu; Deng-Ke Niu
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Exceptional Enlargement of the Mitochondrial Genome Results from Distinct Causes in Different Rain Frogs (Anura: Brevicipitidae: Breviceps).

Authors:  Keitaro Hemmi; Ryosuke Kakehashi; Chiaki Kambayashi; Louis Du Preez; Leslie Minter; Nobuaki Furuno; Atsushi Kurabayashi
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.326

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.