Literature DB >> 21884066

No evidence for postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Outi Ala-Honkola1, Mollie K Manier, Stefan Lüpold, Scott Pitnick.   

Abstract

Selection to avoid inbreeding is predicted to vary across species due to differences in population structure and reproductive biology. Over the past decade, there have been numerous investigations of postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance, a phenomenon that first requires discrimination of mate (or sperm) relatedness and then requires mechanisms of male ejaculate tailoring and/or cryptic female choice to avoid kin. The number of studies that have found a negative association between male-female genetic relatedness and competitive fertilization success is roughly equal to the number of studies that have not found such a relationship. In the former case, the underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. The present study was undertaken to verify and expand upon a previous report of postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance in D. melanogaster, as well as to resolve underlying mechanisms of inbreeding avoidance using transgenic flies that express a sperm head-specific fluorescent tag. However, siblings did not have a lower fertilization success as compared to unrelated males in either the first (P(1) ) or second (P(2) ) mate role in sperm competition with a standard unrelated competitor male in our study population of D. melanogaster. Analyses of mating latency, copulation duration, egg production rate, and remating interval further revealed no evidence for inbreeding avoidance.
© 2011 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21884066     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01317.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  14 in total

1.  Kin recognition in Drosophila: the importance of ecology and gut microbiota.

Authors:  Anne Lizé; Raegan McKay; Zenobia Lewis
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 2.  The consequences of polyandry for population viability, extinction risk and conservation.

Authors:  Luke Holman; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Meta-analytic evidence that animals rarely avoid inbreeding.

Authors:  Raïssa A de Boer; Regina Vega-Trejo; Alexander Kotrschal; John L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Sperm quality but not relatedness predicts sperm competition success in threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus).

Authors:  Marion Mehlis; Anna K Rahn; Theo C M Bakker
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Evidence for inbreeding depression and pre-copulatory, but not post copulatory inbreeding avoidance in the cabbage beetle Colaphellus bowringi.

Authors:  XingPing Liu; XiaoYun Tu; HaiMin He; Chao Chen; FangSen Xue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Resolving the conundrum of inbreeding depression but no inbreeding avoidance: Estimating sex-specific selection on inbreeding by song sparrows (Melospiza melodia).

Authors:  Jane M Reid; Peter Arcese; Greta Bocedi; A Bradley Duthie; Matthew E Wolak; Lukas F Keller
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Oh, the places they'll go: Female sperm storage and sperm precedence in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sandra L Schnakenberg; Mark L Siegal; Margaret C Bloch Qazi
Journal:  Spermatogenesis       Date:  2012-07-01

8.  Incestuous sisters: mate preference for brothers over unrelated males in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Adeline Loyau; Jérémie H Cornuau; Jean Clobert; Etienne Danchin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Inbreeding reveals mode of past selection on male reproductive characters in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Outi Ala-Honkola; David J Hosken; Mollie K Manier; Stefan Lüpold; Elizabeth M Droge-Young; Kirstin S Berben; William F Collins; John M Belote; Scott Pitnick
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Subsocial Cockroaches Nauphoeta cinerea Mate Indiscriminately with Kin Despite High Costs of Inbreeding.

Authors:  Sofia Bouchebti; Virginie Durier; Cristian Pasquaretta; Colette Rivault; Mathieu Lihoreau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.