BACKGROUND: The serologic assignment of the RhD status may be hindered in patients with weak D expression. A comprehensive study of RHD alleles occurring in the mixed population of Argentina is necessary to evaluate the most suitable DNA typing strategy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 18,379 patients from two stratified groups, Group 1 (G1; public hospital) and Group 2 (G2; private laboratory), were RhD phenotyped, and 88 samples with reduced D expression underwent molecular characterization. RESULTS: The frequencies of D+, D-, and variant D phenotypes differed significantly (p < 0.001) between G1 and G2 (94.49% vs. 87.66%, 5.15% vs. 11.58%, and 0.36% vs. 0.75%, respectively). Eleven alleles were responsible for the weak D expression. Approximately 60% of the variant D phenotypes from G1 and G2 were weak D Types 1 through 4.0/4.2 and 25% were DVII. RHD alleles associated with African ancestry were encountered in G1. A new -282G>A mutation within the promoter region of DAU-4 and DOL alleles was identified. Three weak D Type 1 samples on R(0) haplotypes were found in G1. CONCLUSIONS: The D phenotype distribution in G2 resembles that in Europeans while the frequencies in G1 account for the Amerindian and African genetic contribution. The genotyping strategy described here is suitable to study D variants in the overall population and could allow a better use of the few available D- units and a rational administration of anti-D immunoprophylaxis. The results also show that weak D Type 1 alleles do not exclusively segregate with a Ce allele, as assumed until present.
BACKGROUND: The serologic assignment of the RhD status may be hindered in patients with weak D expression. A comprehensive study of RHD alleles occurring in the mixed population of Argentina is necessary to evaluate the most suitable DNA typing strategy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 18,379 patients from two stratified groups, Group 1 (G1; public hospital) and Group 2 (G2; private laboratory), were RhD phenotyped, and 88 samples with reduced D expression underwent molecular characterization. RESULTS: The frequencies of D+, D-, and variant D phenotypes differed significantly (p < 0.001) between G1 and G2 (94.49% vs. 87.66%, 5.15% vs. 11.58%, and 0.36% vs. 0.75%, respectively). Eleven alleles were responsible for the weak D expression. Approximately 60% of the variant D phenotypes from G1 and G2 were weak D Types 1 through 4.0/4.2 and 25% were DVII. RHD alleles associated with African ancestry were encountered in G1. A new -282G>A mutation within the promoter region of DAU-4 and DOL alleles was identified. Three weak D Type 1 samples on R(0) haplotypes were found in G1. CONCLUSIONS: The D phenotype distribution in G2 resembles that in Europeans while the frequencies in G1 account for the Amerindian and African genetic contribution. The genotyping strategy described here is suitable to study D variants in the overall population and could allow a better use of the few available D- units and a rational administration of anti-D immunoprophylaxis. The results also show that weak D Type 1 alleles do not exclusively segregate with a Ce allele, as assumed until present.
Authors: S Gerald Sandler; Willy A Flegel; Connie M Westhoff; Gregory A Denomme; Meghan Delaney; Margaret A Keller; Susan T Johnson; Louis Katz; John T Queenan; Ralph R Vassallo; Clayton D Simon Journal: Transfusion Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Carolina Trucco Boggione; Melina E Luján Brajovich; Stella M Mattaloni; René A Di Mónaco; Silvia E García Borrás; Claudia S Biondi; Carlos M Cotorruelo Journal: Blood Transfus Date: 2016-03-21 Impact factor: 3.443