Literature DB >> 21882885

Effects of a protecting osmolyte on the ion atmosphere surrounding DNA duplexes.

Joshua M Blose1, Suzette A Pabit, Steve P Meisburger, Li Li, Christopher D Jones, Lois Pollack.   

Abstract

Osmolytes are small, chemically diverse, organic solutes that function as an essential component of cellular stress response. Protecting osmolytes enhance protein stability via preferential exclusion, and nonprotecting osmolytes, such as urea, destabilize protein structures. Although much is known about osmolyte effects on proteins, less is understood about osmolyte effects on nucleic acids and their counterion atmospheres. Nonprotecting osmolytes destabilize nucleic acid structures, but effects of protecting osmolytes depend on numerous factors including the type of nucleic acid and the complexity of the functional fold. To begin quantifying protecting osmolyte effects on nucleic acid interactions, we used small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) techniques to monitor DNA duplexes in the presence of sucrose. This protecting osmolyte is a commonly used contrast matching agent in SAXS studies of protein-nucleic acid complexes; thus, it is important to characterize interaction changes induced by sucrose. Measurements of interactions between duplexes showed no dependence on the presence of up to 30% sucrose, except under high Mg(2+) conditions where stacking interactions were disfavored. The number of excess ions associated with DNA duplexes, reported by anomalous small-angle X-ray scattering (ASAXS) experiments, was sucrose independent. Although protecting osmolytes can destabilize secondary structures, our results suggest that ion atmospheres of individual duplexes remain unperturbed by sucrose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21882885      PMCID: PMC3500086          DOI: 10.1021/bi200710m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  45 in total

1.  Design of a highly reactive HDV ribozyme sequence uncovers facilitation of RNA folding by alternative pairings and physiological ionic strength.

Authors:  Trevor S Brown; Durga M Chadalavada; Philip C Bevilacqua
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Inter-DNA attraction mediated by divalent counterions.

Authors:  Xiangyun Qiu; Kurt Andresen; Lisa W Kwok; Jessica S Lamb; Hye Yoon Park; Lois Pollack
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Use of urea and glycine betaine to quantify coupled folding and probe the burial of DNA phosphates in lac repressor-lac operator binding.

Authors:  Jiang Hong; Mike W Capp; Ruth M Saecker; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Fast folding mutants of the Tetrahymena group I ribozyme reveal a rugged folding energy landscape.

Authors:  M S Rook; D K Treiber; J R Williamson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-08-28       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Structural model of the 50S subunit of E. coli ribosomes from solution scattering.

Authors:  D I Svergun; M H Koch; J S Pedersen; I N Serdyuk
Journal:  Basic Life Sci       Date:  1996

Review 6.  SAXS studies of ion-nucleic acid interactions.

Authors:  Lois Pollack
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 12.981

7.  Separation of preferential interaction and excluded volume effects on DNA duplex and hairpin stability.

Authors:  D B Knowles; Andrew S LaCroix; Nickolas F Deines; Irina Shkel; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Direct quantitation of Mg2+-RNA interactions by use of a fluorescent dye.

Authors:  Dan Grilley; Ana Maria Soto; David E Draper
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.600

9.  Effects of trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) and crowding agents on the stability of RNA hairpins.

Authors:  David L Pincus; Changbong Hyeon; D Thirumalai
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Effects of osmolytes on RNA secondary and tertiary structure stabilities and RNA-Mg2+ interactions.

Authors:  Dominic Lambert; David E Draper
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  8 in total

1.  Quantitative Studies of an RNA Duplex Electrostatics by Ion Counting.

Authors:  Magdalena Gebala; Daniel Herschlag
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Asymmetric unwrapping of nucleosomal DNA propagates asymmetric opening and dissociation of the histone core.

Authors:  Yujie Chen; Joshua M Tokuda; Traci Topping; Steve P Meisburger; Suzette A Pabit; Lisa M Gloss; Lois Pollack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Determining the Locations of Ions and Water around DNA from X-Ray Scattering Measurements.

Authors:  Steve P Meisburger; Suzette A Pabit; Lois Pollack
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Local DNA Sequence Controls Asymmetry of DNA Unwrapping from Nucleosome Core Particles.

Authors:  Alexander W Mauney; Joshua M Tokuda; Lisa M Gloss; Oscar Gonzalez; Lois Pollack
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Predicting Molecular Crowding Effects in Ion-RNA Interactions.

Authors:  Tao Yu; Yuhong Zhu; Zhaojian He; Shi-Jie Chen
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Single-molecule FRET studies of HIV TAR-DNA hairpin unfolding dynamics.

Authors:  Jixin Chen; Nitesh K Poddar; Lawrence J Tauzin; David Cooper; Anatoly B Kolomeisky; Christy F Landes
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Osmolyte Induced Tumorigenesis and Metastasis: Interactions With Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

Authors:  Franklin D Rumjanek
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Effects of osmolytes and macromolecular crowders on stable GAAA tetraloops and their preference for a CG closing base pair.

Authors:  Kaethe N Leonard; Joshua M Blose
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.