Sharyn J Potter1, Mary M Moynihan. 1. Department of Sociology, 20 Academic Way, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This pilot study describes an evaluation of the Bringing in the Bystander (BITB) in-person program conducted with United States Army Europe personnel. METHODS: The sample was comprised of 394 soldiers (29% participated in and 71% had not participated in the BITB program). Data were analyzed 4V2 months after the program was presented. RESULTS: Compared to the soldiers who did not participate in the program, soldiers who participated in the program were significantly more likely to report that they had engaged in one or more of the 117 behaviors, that they had helped an acquaintance or a stranger, and that they had taken action when they saw sexual assault or stalking occurring, about to occur or after it had occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that with thoughtful and appropriate modifications, the BITB in-person prevention program, initially developed for a college audience, can be transferred to a military audience.
OBJECTIVES: This pilot study describes an evaluation of the Bringing in the Bystander (BITB) in-person program conducted with United States Army Europe personnel. METHODS: The sample was comprised of 394 soldiers (29% participated in and 71% had not participated in the BITB program). Data were analyzed 4V2 months after the program was presented. RESULTS: Compared to the soldiers who did not participate in the program, soldiers who participated in the program were significantly more likely to report that they had engaged in one or more of the 117 behaviors, that they had helped an acquaintance or a stranger, and that they had taken action when they saw sexual assault or stalking occurring, about to occur or after it had occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that with thoughtful and appropriate modifications, the BITB in-person prevention program, initially developed for a college audience, can be transferred to a military audience.
Authors: Katie M Edwards; Victoria L Banyard; Stephanie N Sessarego; Emily A Waterman; Kimberly J Mitchell; Hong Chang Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2019-02-14
Authors: Lindsay M Orchowski; Cristóbal S Berry-Cabán; Kara Prisock; Brian Borsari; Donna M Kazemi Journal: Mil Med Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Ann L Coker; Heather M Bush; Bonnie S Fisher; Suzanne C Swan; Corrine M Williams; Emily R Clear; Sarah DeGue Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Sarah DeGue; Greta M Massetti; Melissa K Holt; Andra Teten Tharp; Linda Anne Valle; Jennifer L Matjasko; Caroline Lippy Journal: Psychol Violence Date: 2013-04
Authors: Anaïs Llorens; Athina Tzovara; Ludovic Bellier; Ilina Bhaya-Grossman; Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; William K Chang; Zachariah R Cross; Rosa Dominguez-Faus; Adeen Flinker; Yvonne Fonken; Mark A Gorenstein; Chris Holdgraf; Colin W Hoy; Maria V Ivanova; Richard T Jimenez; Soyeon Jun; Julia W Y Kam; Celeste Kidd; Enitan Marcelle; Deborah Marciano; Stephanie Martin; Nicholas E Myers; Karita Ojala; Anat Perry; Pedro Pinheiro-Chagas; Stephanie K Riès; Ignacio Saez; Ivan Skelin; Katarina Slama; Brooke Staveland; Danielle S Bassett; Elizabeth A Buffalo; Adrienne L Fairhall; Nancy J Kopell; Laura J Kray; Jack J Lin; Anna C Nobre; Dylan Riley; Anne-Kristin Solbakk; Joni D Wallis; Xiao-Jing Wang; Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; Sabine Kastner; Robert T Knight; Nina F Dronkers Journal: Neuron Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 18.688
Authors: Eliza Notaro; Vanessa L Pascoe; Daniel S Hippe; Kristina Lachance; Michi M Shinohara; Katherine L DeNiro Journal: Int J Womens Dermatol Date: 2020-11-05