Monika Fagevik Olsén1, Elisabet Wennberg. 1. Department of Physical Therapy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45, Göteborg, Sweden. monika.fagevik-olsen@vgregion.se
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this article was to review the research considering fast-track concepts in upper abdominal and thoracoabdominal surgery. METHODS: A search for clinical studies evaluating the fast-track concept after open major upper abdominal or thoracoabdominal surgery was performed. Reference lists of identified articles were searched. Trials-written in English-that compared a concept and traditional care were evaluated with regard to their internal validity. Level of evidence was defined and each outcome was evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 15 articles were found, separated into gastric (n = 2), pancreatic (n = 5), hepatic (n = 2), esophageal (n = 3), and aortic surgery (n = 3). Three were randomized, controlled trials. The different trials represented various concepts of fast-track surgery, but the majority included specific programs for analgesics, avoidance of drainage tubes, early start of oral nutrition, and early and active mobilization. There is moderate evidence that fast-track concepts result in shorter hospital stay. There is low evidence that fast-track concepts shorten need of ventilation, decrease the need of care at the intensive care unit, decrease postoperative pain, and reduce total hospital costs. The concepts seem to have similar rates of surgical complications, readmission rate, and mortality rates as conventional care. No specific adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Although the methodological quality of the articles reviewed was low and the trials heterogeneous, all trials concluded that the introduction of fast-track concepts were safe and feasible, achieved shorter hospital stays, and reduced costs. Future randomized, controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the effect of these concepts.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this article was to review the research considering fast-track concepts in upper abdominal and thoracoabdominal surgery. METHODS: A search for clinical studies evaluating the fast-track concept after open major upper abdominal or thoracoabdominal surgery was performed. Reference lists of identified articles were searched. Trials-written in English-that compared a concept and traditional care were evaluated with regard to their internal validity. Level of evidence was defined and each outcome was evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 15 articles were found, separated into gastric (n = 2), pancreatic (n = 5), hepatic (n = 2), esophageal (n = 3), and aortic surgery (n = 3). Three were randomized, controlled trials. The different trials represented various concepts of fast-track surgery, but the majority included specific programs for analgesics, avoidance of drainage tubes, early start of oral nutrition, and early and active mobilization. There is moderate evidence that fast-track concepts result in shorter hospital stay. There is low evidence that fast-track concepts shorten need of ventilation, decrease the need of care at the intensive care unit, decrease postoperative pain, and reduce total hospital costs. The concepts seem to have similar rates of surgical complications, readmission rate, and mortality rates as conventional care. No specific adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Although the methodological quality of the articles reviewed was low and the trials heterogeneous, all trials concluded that the introduction of fast-track concepts were safe and feasible, achieved shorter hospital stays, and reduced costs. Future randomized, controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the effect of these concepts.
Authors: J Diks; D E C van Hoorn; R J Nijveldt; P G Boelens; Z Hofman; H Bouritius; Klaske van Norren; P A M van Leeuwen Journal: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Eugene P Kennedy; Ernest L Rosato; Patricia K Sauter; Laura M Rosenberg; Cataldo Doria; Ignazio R Marino; Karen A Chojnacki; Adam C Berger; Charles J Yeo Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: G Brodner; E Pogatzki; H Van Aken; H Buerkle; C Goeters; C Schulzki; H Nottberg; N Mertes Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 1998-02 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: G A Porter; P W Pisters; C Mansyur; A Bisanz; K Reyna; P Stanford; J E Lee; D B Evans Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: P O Berberat; H Ingold; A Gulbinas; J Kleeff; M W Müller; C Gutt; M Weigand; H Friess; M W Büchler Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Bobby V M Dasari; Rasha Rahman; Shakeeb Khan; Davinia Bennett; James Hodson; John Isaac; Ravi Marudanayagam; Darius F Mirza; Paolo Muiesan; Keith J Roberts; Robert P Sutcliffe Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Lesley Gotlib Conn; Ori D Rotstein; Elisa Greco; Andrea C Tricco; Laure Perrier; Charlene Soobiah; Tony Moloney Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2012-11-02