Literature DB >> 21881841

Comparison of measurement error of Cirrus HD-OCT and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 in patients with early glaucomatous visual field defect.

Alexander A Shpak1, Maria K Sevostyanova, Svetlana N Ogorodnikova, Irina N Shormaz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the measurement error of Cirrus HD-OCT and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 (HRT3) in patients with early glaucomatous visual field defect.
METHODS: Thirty-nine consecutive patients (39 eyes) with early glaucomatous visual field defect were included. One eye of a patient was examined with Cirrus HD-OCT and HRT3 in one session. Each instrument was used by two operators, each taking two measurements in turn. We performed measurements of average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and RNFL thickness in four quadrants with Cirrus HD-OCT and 13 stereometric parameters of the optic nerve head and RNFL with HRT3.
RESULTS: Cirrus HD-OCT parameters performed much better than HRT3 stereometric parameters. Mean (for both operators) intraoperator within-subject coefficient of variation of the best Cirrus HD-OCT parameter (average RNFL thickness) was 2.6-2.7 times lower than the best HRT3 parameters [mean cup depth and rim area (P < 0.001)]. Mean intraoperator variability of RNFL thickness in quadrants (except nasal quadrant) was also significantly lower with OCT than with HRT. The interoperator within-subject coefficients of variation for both average RNFL thickness and RNFL thickness in all quadrants were significantly lower than the interoperator variability of best HRT3 parameter [mean cup depth (P < 0.001)]. The within-subject coefficient of variation of the average/mean RNFL thickness assessed by both instruments was 5.4-7.3 times lower for Cirrus HD-OCT. Among HRT3 parameters, mean cup depth, rim area and linear cup/disk ratio were the least variable, while cup volume, cup area and cup/disc area ratio were the most variable parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: Cirrus HD-OCT provides excellent intrasession intra- and interoperator repeatability of the RNFL measurements, especially of the average RNFL thickness in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients and POAG suspects with early glaucomatous visual field defect. The measurement error (expressed as within-subject coefficient of variation) of RNFL measurements by Cirrus HD-OCT is much lower than the error of HRT3 measurements of stereometric parameters of the optic nerve head and RNFL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21881841     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-011-1808-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of long-term fluctuations: laser scanning tomography versus automated perimetry.

Authors:  Jens Funk; Heiko Mueller
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Short-term intra-individual variability in heidelberg retina tomograph II.

Authors:  N Verdonck; T Zeyen; L Van Malderen; W Spileers
Journal:  Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol       Date:  2002

3.  Intrasession, intersession, and interexaminer variabilities of retinal nerve fiber layer measurements with spectral-domain OCT.

Authors:  Fernanda Cremasco; Graziela Massa; Vanessa Gonçalves Vidotti; Álvaro Pedroso de Carvalho Lupinacci; Vital Paulino Costa
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.597

4.  Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease.

Authors:  Richard P Mills; Donald L Budenz; Paul P Lee; Robert J Noecker; John G Walt; Lisa R Siegartel; Stacy J Evans; John J Doyle
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Reproducibility of OCT/SLO measurements in healthy eyes.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Athanassios Giarmoukakis; Andreas Katsanos; Maria G Gkika; Michael Fanariotis; Efi Pavlidou; Vassilios P Kozobolis
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.597

6.  Measurement error.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-21

7.  Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of optic disc stereometric parameters by Heidelberg Retina Tomograph.

Authors:  Stefano Miglior; Elena Albé; Magda Guareschi; Luca Rossetti; Nicola Orzalesi
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Factors affecting the variability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph III measurements in newly diagnosed glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Tiago Santos Prata; Daniel Meira-Freitas; Verônica Castro Lima; Lia Manis Guedes; Fernanda Pedreira Magalhães; Augusto Paranhos Junior
Journal:  Arq Bras Oftalmol       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.872

9.  Factors affecting the test-retest variability of Heidelberg retina tomograph and Heidelberg retina tomograph II measurements.

Authors:  N G Strouthidis; E T White; V M F Owen; T A Ho; C J Hammond; D F Garway-Heath
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness.

Authors:  G Vizzeri; R N Weinreb; A O Gonzalez-Garcia; C Bowd; F A Medeiros; P A Sample; L M Zangwill
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.638

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Test-retest variability in structural parameters measured with glaucoma imaging devices.

Authors:  Makoto Araie
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Glaucoma diagnosis optic disc analysis comparing Cirrus spectral domain optical coherence tomography and Heidelberg retina tomograph II.

Authors:  Hye Young Shin; Hae-Young Lopilly Park; Kyoung In Jung; Chan Kee Park
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Relationship between corneal hysteresis and optic nerve parameters measured with spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Daniel M Vu; Fabiana Q Silva; Sarah J Haseltine; Joshua R Ehrlich; Nathan M Radcliffe
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Evaluation of subjects with a moderate cup to disc ratio using optical coherence tomography and Heidelberg retina tomograph 3: impact of the disc area.

Authors:  Fatih Ulas; Ümit Dogan; Abdulgani Kaymaz; Fatih Çelik; Serdal Çelebi
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  HRT for the Diagnosis and Detection of Glaucoma Progression.

Authors:  Jessica S Maslin; Kaweh Mansouri; Syril K Dorairaj
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2015-05-15

6.  Determination of axial length requiring adjustment of measured circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness for ocular magnification.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Nobuyuki Shoji; Yukako Yoshii; Shota Haraguchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.