Literature DB >> 21879419

Fechner, information, and shape perception.

Joseph S Lappin1, J Farley Norman, Flip Phillips.   

Abstract

How do retinal images lead to perceived environmental objects? Vision involves a series of spatial and material transformations--from environmental objects to retinal images, to neurophysiological patterns, and finally to perceptual experience and action. A rationale for understanding functional relations among these physically different systems occurred to Gustav Fechner: Differences in sensation correspond to differences in physical stimulation. The concept of information is similar: Relationships in one system may correspond to, and thus represent, those in another. Criteria for identifying and evaluating information include (a) resolution, or the precision of correspondence; (b) uncertainty about which input (output) produced a given output (input); and (c) invariance, or the preservation of correspondence under transformations of input and output. We apply this framework to psychophysical evidence to identify visual information for perceiving surfaces. The elementary spatial structure shared by objects and images is the second-order differential structure of local surface shape. Experiments have shown that human vision is directly sensitive to this higher-order spatial information from interimage disparities (stereopsis and motion parallax), boundary contours, texture, shading, and combined variables. Psychophysical evidence contradicts other common ideas about retinal information for spatial vision and object perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21879419     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0197-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  7 in total

Review 1.  Processing convexity and concavity along a 2-D contour: figure-ground, structural shape, and attention.

Authors:  Marco Bertamini; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

2.  Solid shape discrimination from vision and haptics: natural objects (Capsicum annuum) and Gibson's "feelies".

Authors:  J Farley Norman; Flip Phillips; Jessica S Holmin; Hideko F Norman; Amanda M Beers; Alexandria M Boswell; Jacob R Cheeseman; Angela G Stethen; Cecilia Ronning
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Does this computational theory solve the right problem? Marr, Gibson, and the goal of vision.

Authors:  William H Warren
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  The Recognition of Solid Object Shape: The Importance of Inhomogeneity.

Authors:  J Farley Norman; Sydney P Wheeler; Lauren E Pedersen; Lindsey M Shain; Jonathan D Kinnard; Joel Lenoir
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2019-08-13

5.  Form and Function in Information for Visual Perception.

Authors:  Joseph S Lappin; Herbert H Bell
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2021-12-23

Review 6.  The many facets of shape.

Authors:  James T Todd; Alexander A Petrov
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  What is binocular disparity?

Authors:  Joseph S Lappin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.