Literature DB >> 21877290

Imputing and predicting quantitative genetic interactions in epistatic MAPs.

Colm Ryan1, Gerard Cagney, Nevan Krogan, Pádraig Cunningham, Derek Greene.   

Abstract

Mapping epistatic (or genetic) interactions has emerged as an important network biology approach for establishing functional relationships among genes and proteins. Epistasis networks are complementary to physical protein interaction networks, providing valuable insight into both the function of individual genes and the overall wiring of the cell. A high-throughput method termed "epistatic mini array profiles" (E-MAPs) was recently developed in yeast to quantify alleviating or aggravating interactions between gene pairs. The typical output of an E-MAP experiment is a large symmetric matrix of interaction scores. One problem with this data is the large amount of missing values - interactions that cannot be measured during the high-throughput process or whose measurements were discarded due to quality filtering steps. These missing values can reduce the effectiveness of some data analysis techniques and prevent the use of others. Here, we discuss one solution to this problem, imputation using nearest neighbors, and give practical examples of the use of a freely available implementation of this method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21877290      PMCID: PMC3376077          DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-276-2_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  19 in total

1.  Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays.

Authors:  O Troyanskaya; M Cantor; G Sherlock; P Brown; T Hastie; R Tibshirani; D Botstein; R B Altman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Missing value estimation for DNA microarray gene expression data: local least squares imputation.

Authors:  Hyunsoo Kim; Gene H Golub; Haesun Park
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  LSimpute: accurate estimation of missing values in microarray data with least squares methods.

Authors:  Trond Hellem Bø; Bjarte Dysvik; Inge Jonassen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Combining biological networks to predict genetic interactions.

Authors:  Sharyl L Wong; Lan V Zhang; Amy H Y Tong; Zhijian Li; Debra S Goldberg; Oliver D King; Guillaume Lesage; Marc Vidal; Brenda Andrews; Howard Bussey; Charles Boone; Frederick P Roth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile.

Authors:  Maya Schuldiner; Sean R Collins; Natalie J Thompson; Vladimir Denic; Arunashree Bhamidipati; Thanuja Punna; Jan Ihmels; Brenda Andrews; Charles Boone; Jack F Greenblatt; Jonathan S Weissman; Nevan J Krogan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Systematic interpretation of genetic interactions using protein networks.

Authors:  Ryan Kelley; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Quantitative genetic interaction mapping using the E-MAP approach.

Authors:  Sean R Collins; Assen Roguev; Nevan J Krogan
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 1.600

8.  Systematic mapping of genetic interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans identifies common modifiers of diverse signaling pathways.

Authors:  Ben Lehner; Catriona Crombie; Julia Tischler; Angelo Fortunato; Andrew G Fraser
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-07-16       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns.

Authors:  M B Eisen; P T Spellman; P O Brown; D Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A strategy for extracting and analyzing large-scale quantitative epistatic interaction data.

Authors:  Sean R Collins; Maya Schuldiner; Nevan J Krogan; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  3 in total

1.  Data Imputation in Epistatic MAPs by Network-Guided Matrix Completion.

Authors:  Marinka Žitnik; Blaž Zupan
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Regulatory networks in retinal ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Kalina Andreeva; Maha M Soliman; Nigel G F Cooper
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 2.797

3.  A causal mediation model of ischemia reperfusion injury in the retina.

Authors:  Maha Soliman; Kalina Andreeva; Olfa Nasraoui; Nigel G F Cooper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.