| Literature DB >> 21876646 |
Ann E Walts1, Juan Lechago, Bing Hu, Marybeth Shwayder, Lynn Sandweiss, Shikha Bose.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Significant variation is reported in the diagnosis of HPV-associated AIN. We previously observed that band-like positivity for p16 in >90% of contiguous cells coupled with Ki67 positivity in >50% of lesional cells is strongly associated with high grade AIN. This study was undertaken to determine if addition of p16 and Ki67 immunostaining would reduce inter- and intraobserver variability in diagnosis and grading of AIN.Entities:
Keywords: Ki67; P16; anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN); condyloma; human papilloma virus (HPV); interobserver variability; intraobserver variability
Year: 2008 PMID: 21876646 PMCID: PMC3159996 DOI: 10.4137/cpath.s501
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Med Pathol ISSN: 1178-1181
Intraobserver Variation in Diagnosis: H&E vs. H&E+p16 and Ki67 (N = number of cases Total = 60 cases).
| MD “A” | 20 (33%) | 17 | 3 (15%) | 5 | 15 |
| MD “B” | 14 (23%) | 12 | 2 (14%) | 12 | 2 |
| MD “C” | 29 (48%) | 25 | 4 (16%) | 9 | 20 |
Intraobserver Variation in diagnosis: Agreement with consensus diagnoses (N = number of cases Total = 60 cases).
| MD “A” | 40 | 49 |
| MD “B” | 51 | 51 |
| MD “C” | 32 | 41 |
Interobserver Variation (N = number of cases Total = 60 cases).
| All 3 participant MDs agree | 24 | 35 |
| Only 2 participant MDs agree | 36 | 23 |
| No 2 participant MDs agree | 0 | 2 |
| One step difference in diagnosis | 31 | 23 |
| Two step difference in diagnosis | 5 | 0 |
Interobserver Variation in diagnosis: Agreement with consensus diagnosis (N = number of cases Total = 60 cases).
| All 3 participant MDs agree with consensus diagnosis | 20 | 33 |
| Multirater kappa | 0.4486 | 0.5657 |
| Total diagnoses that agreed with consensus diagnoses | 123 (68.3%) | 141 (78.3%) |
Total diagnoses = 180 (60×3)
Figure 1.Anal biopsy showing a) condyloma (arrowhead) and squamous epithelium equivocal for high grade AIN (arrow); b) spotty p16 positivity in condyloma and absence of staining in epithelium equivocal for AIN; c) Ki67 positivity in <50% of nuclei.
Figure 2.Anal biopsy showing a) atypical transitional epithelium equivocal for high grade AIN (arrowhead); b) band-like p16 positivity in high grade AIN and c) Ki67 positivity in >50% of nuclei in high grade AIN.
Interobserver Variation: Cases with interobserver agreement in diagnosis (N = number of cases with all three participant pathologists agreeing on the diagnosis, Total = 60 cases).
| Negative | 6 (0.42) | 13 (0.59) |
| Low grade AIN | 7 (0.32) | 7 (0.35) |
| High grade AIN | 11 (0.61) | 15 (0.75) |
| Overall weighted kappa | 0.45 | 0.57 |