Literature DB >> 19918096

A population analysis of weight-related differences in lopinavir pharmacokinetics and possible consequences for protease inhibitor-naive and -experienced patients.

Marion Bouillon-Pichault1, Vincent Jullien, Christophe Piketty, Jean-Paul Viard, Jean-Pierre Morini, Stéphanie Chhun, Anne Krivine, Dominique Salmon, Nicolas Dupin, Laurence Weiss, Olivier Lortholary, Gérard Pons, Odile Launay, Jean-Marc Treluyer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lopinavir is a potent protease inhibitor (PI) used for the treatment of HIV infection. Different lopinavir target trough concentrations (C(troughs)) were previously determined according to patient treatment histories: 1 mg/l for PI-naive patients, and 4 and 5.7 mg/l for PI-experienced patients. However, the probability to achieve these target C(troughs) with the current 400 mg twice-daily or 800 mg once-daily doses of the new tablet form, and the influence of body weight on this probability are unknown.
METHODS: A population pharmacokinetic model for lopinavir was developed using data from 424 HIV type-1-infected patients, and the final model was used to estimate the probability to achieve target C(troughs) via Monte Carlo simulations.
RESULTS: A one-compartment model adequately described the data. Mean population estimates (percentage interindividual variability) were 4.61 l/h (36%) for apparent clearance (CL/F) and 63.2 l (70%) for apparent distribution volume. Body weight was found to explain the interindividual variability of lopinavir CL/F. Probability to achieve the 1 mg/l target C(trough) was >96% for the twice-daily dose and comprised between 80% and 90% for the once-daily dose. The probability to achieve the 4 and 5.7 mg/l target C(troughs) with the twice-daily dose significantly decreased when body weight increased (from 76% to 61% and from 56% to 37% respectively, for body weights increasing from 50 to 90 kg).
CONCLUSIONS: These results support lopinavir therapeutic drug monitoring and the use of higher lopinavir doses for PI-pretreated patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19918096     DOI: 10.3851/IMP1414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antivir Ther        ISSN: 1359-6535


  5 in total

1.  Impact of body weight and missed doses on lopinavir concentrations with standard and increased lopinavir/ritonavir doses during late pregnancy.

Authors:  Tim R Cressey; Saik Urien; Edmund V Capparelli; Brookie M Best; Sudanee Buranabanjasatean; Aram Limtrakul; Boonsong Rawangban; Prapan Sabsanong; Jean-Marc Treluyer; Gonzague Jourdain; Alice Stek; Marc Lallemant; Mark Mirochnick
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Pharmacokinetics and virologic response of zidovudine/lopinavir/ritonavir initiated during the third trimester of pregnancy.

Authors:  Tim R Cressey; Gonzague Jourdain; Boonsong Rawangban; Supang Varadisai; Rucha Kongpanichkul; Prapan Sabsanong; Prapap Yuthavisuthi; Somnuk Chirayus; Nicole Ngo-Giang-Huong; Nipunporn Voramongkol; Somsak Pattarakulwanich; Marc Lallemant
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 4.177

3.  Age-related changes in plasma concentrations of the HIV protease inhibitor lopinavir.

Authors:  Keith W Crawford; John Spritzler; Robert C Kalayjian; Teresa Parsons; Alan Landay; Richard Pollard; Vicki Stocker; Michael M Lederman; Charles Flexner
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.205

4.  Pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir crushed versus whole tablets in children.

Authors:  Brookie M Best; Edmund V Capparelli; Huy Diep; Steven S Rossi; Michael J Farrell; Elaine Williams; Grace Lee; John N van den Anker; Natella Rakhmanina
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetic optimization of antiretroviral therapy in pregnancy.

Authors:  Kajal Buckoreelall; Tim R Cressey; Jennifer R King
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 5.577

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.