Literature DB >> 21876382

The toxin and antidote puzzle: new ways to control insect pest populations through manipulating inheritance.

John M Marshall1.   

Abstract

Insects carry out essential ecological functions, such as pollination, but also cause extensive damage to agricultural crops, and transmit human diseases such as malaria and dengue fever. Advances in insect transgenesis are making it increasingly feasible to engineer genes conferring desirable phenotypes, and gene drive systems are required to spread these genes into wild populations. Medea provides one solution, being able to spread into a population from very low initial frequencies through the action of a maternally-expressed toxin linked to a zygotically-expressed antidote. Several other toxin-antidote combinations are imaginable that distort the offspring ratio in favor of a desired transgene, or drive the population towards an all-male crash. We explore two such systems--Semele, which is capable of spreading a desired transgene into an isolated population in a confined manner; and Merea, which is capable of inducing a local population crash when located on the Z chromosome of a Lepidopteron pest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21876382      PMCID: PMC3225740          DOI: 10.4161/bbug.2.5.15801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioeng Bugs        ISSN: 1949-1018


  41 in total

1.  Insect population control using a dominant, repressible, lethal genetic system.

Authors:  D D Thomas; C A Donnelly; R J Wood; L S Alphey
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-03-31       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Malaria control with genetically manipulated insect vectors.

Authors:  Luke Alphey; C Ben Beard; Peter Billingsley; Maureen Coetzee; Andrea Crisanti; Chris Curtis; Paul Eggleston; Charles Godfray; Janet Hemingway; Marcelo Jacobs-Lorena; Anthony A James; Fotis C Kafatos; Louis G Mukwaya; Michael Paton; Jeffrey R Powell; William Schneider; Thomas W Scott; Barbara Sina; Robert Sinden; Steven Sinkins; Andrew Spielman; Yeya Touré; Frank H Collins
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Transgenic mosquitoes and the fight against malaria: managing technology push in a turbulent GMO world.

Authors:  Bart G J Knols; Hervé C Bossin; Wolfgang R Mukabana; Alan S Robinson
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  scat+ is a selfish gene analogous to Medea of Tribolium castaneum.

Authors:  L D Hurst
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-11-05       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  The population dynamics of maternal-effect selfish genes.

Authors:  M J Wade; R W Beeman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Properties and natural occurrence of maternal-effect selfish genes ('Medea' factors) in the red flour beetle, tribolium castaneum

Authors: 
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Multilevel analyses of genetic differentiation in Anopheles gambiae s.s. reveal patterns of gene flow important for malaria-fighting mosquito projects.

Authors:  Frédéric Tripet; Guimogo Dolo; Gregory C Lanzaro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  General principles of single-construct chromosomal gene drive.

Authors:  John M Marshall; Bruce A Hay
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Late-acting dominant lethal genetic systems and mosquito control.

Authors:  Hoang Kim Phuc; Morten H Andreasen; Rosemary S Burton; Céline Vass; Matthew J Epton; Gavin Pape; Guoliang Fu; Kirsty C Condon; Sarah Scaife; Christl A Donnelly; Paul G Coleman; Helen White-Cooper; Luke Alphey
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  A theoretical approach to predicting the success of genetic manipulation of malaria mosquitoes in malaria control.

Authors:  Christophe Boëte; Jacob C Koella
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2002-02-25       Impact factor: 2.979

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Cheating evolution: engineering gene drives to manipulate the fate of wild populations.

Authors:  Jackson Champer; Anna Buchman; Omar S Akbari
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Open questions in the study of de novo genes: what, how and why.

Authors:  Aoife McLysaght; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Confinement of gene drive systems to local populations: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  John M Marshall; Bruce A Hay
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Population Dynamics of Underdominance Gene Drive Systems in Continuous Space.

Authors:  Jackson Champer; Joanna Zhao; Samuel E Champer; Jingxian Liu; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 5.110

5.  General principles of single-construct chromosomal gene drive.

Authors:  John M Marshall; Bruce A Hay
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  A toxin-antidote CRISPR gene drive system for regional population modification.

Authors:  Jackson Champer; Esther Lee; Emily Yang; Chen Liu; Andrew G Clark; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Design and analysis of CRISPR-based underdominance toxin-antidote gene drives.

Authors:  Jackson Champer; Samuel E Champer; Isabel K Kim; Andrew G Clark; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 5.183

8.  Medusa: a novel gene drive system for confined suppression of insect populations.

Authors:  John M Marshall; Bruce A Hay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Conditions for success of engineered underdominance gene drive systems.

Authors:  Matthew P Edgington; Luke S Alphey
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.691

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.