Literature DB >> 32142612

Population Dynamics of Underdominance Gene Drive Systems in Continuous Space.

Jackson Champer, Joanna Zhao, Samuel E Champer, Jingxian Liu, Philipp W Messer.   

Abstract

Underdominance systems can quickly spread through a population, but only when introduced in considerable numbers. This promises a gene drive mechanism that is less invasive than homing drives, potentially enabling new approaches in the fight against vector-borne diseases. If regional confinement can indeed be achieved, the decision-making process for a release would likely be much simpler compared to other, more invasive types of drives. The capacity of underdominance gene drive systems to spread in a target population without invading other populations is typically assessed via network models of panmictic demes linked by migration. However, it remains less clear how such systems would behave in more realistic population models where organisms move over a continuous landscape. Here, we use individual-based simulations to study the dynamics of several proposed underdominance systems in continuous-space. We find that all these systems can fail to persist in such environments, even after an initially successful establishment in the release area, confirming previous theoretical results from diffusion theory. At the same time, we find that a two-locus two-toxin-antidote system can invade connected demes through a narrow migration corridor. This suggests that the parameter space where underdominance systems can establish and persist in a release area while at the same time remaining confined to that area could be quite limited, depending on how a population is spatially structured. Overall, these results indicate that realistic spatial context must be considered when assessing strategies for the deployment of underdominance drives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32142612      PMCID: PMC8284921          DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.9b00452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Synth Biol        ISSN: 2161-5063            Impact factor:   5.110


  40 in total

1.  Using underdominance to bi-stably transform local populations.

Authors:  Philipp M Altrock; Arne Traulsen; R Guy Reeves; Floyd A Reed
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 2.  Genetic control of mosquitoes.

Authors:  Luke Alphey
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  Ecological effects on underdominance threshold drives for vector control.

Authors:  Doran Khamis; Claire El Mouden; Klodeta Kura; Michael B Bonsall
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Modelling Allee effects in a transgenic mosquito population during range expansion.

Authors:  Melody Walker; Julie C Blackwood; Vicki Brown; Lauren M Childs
Journal:  J Biol Dyn       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.179

5.  Successful establishment of Wolbachia in Aedes populations to suppress dengue transmission.

Authors:  A A Hoffmann; B L Montgomery; J Popovici; I Iturbe-Ormaetxe; P H Johnson; F Muzzi; M Greenfield; M Durkan; Y S Leong; Y Dong; H Cook; J Axford; A G Callahan; N Kenny; C Omodei; E A McGraw; P A Ryan; S A Ritchie; M Turelli; S L O'Neill
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The fixation of chromosomal rearrangements in a subdivided population with local extinction and colonization.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Engineered underdominance allows efficient and economical introgression of traits into pest populations.

Authors:  S Davis; N Bax; P Grewe
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2001-09-07       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Fine-scale landscape genomics helps explain the slow spatial spread of Wolbachia through the Aedes aegypti population in Cairns, Australia.

Authors:  Thomas L Schmidt; Igor Filipović; Ary A Hoffmann; Gordana Rašić
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Inverse Medea as a novel gene drive system for local population replacement: a theoretical analysis.

Authors:  John M Marshall; Bruce A Hay
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.645

10.  First steps towards underdominant genetic transformation of insect populations.

Authors:  R Guy Reeves; Jarosław Bryk; Philipp M Altrock; Jai A Denton; Floyd A Reed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  Development of CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene-Drive Construct Targeting the Phenotypic Gene in Plutella xylostella.

Authors:  Muhammad Asad; Dan Liu; Jianwen Li; Jing Chen; Guang Yang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Symbiosis and the Anthropocene.

Authors:  Erik F Y Hom; Alexandra S Penn
Journal:  Symbiosis       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Suppressing evolution in genetically engineered systems through repeated supplementation.

Authors:  Nathan C Layman; Beth M Tuschhoff; Andrew J Basinski; Christopher H Remien; James J Bull; Scott L Nuismer
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 5.183

4.  Design and analysis of CRISPR-based underdominance toxin-antidote gene drives.

Authors:  Jackson Champer; Samuel E Champer; Isabel K Kim; Andrew G Clark; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  Split versions of Cleave and Rescue selfish genetic elements for measured self limiting gene drive.

Authors:  Georg Oberhofer; Tobin Ivy; Bruce A Hay
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 5.917

6.  Evading resistance to gene drives.

Authors:  Richard Gomulkiewicz; Micki L Thies; James J Bull
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Modeling CRISPR gene drives for suppression of invasive rodents using a supervised machine learning framework.

Authors:  Samuel E Champer; Nathan Oakes; Ronin Sharma; Pablo García-Díaz; Jackson Champer; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.779

8.  Modeling confinement and reversibility of threshold-dependent gene drive systems in spatially-explicit Aedes aegypti populations.

Authors:  Héctor M Sánchez C; Jared B Bennett; Sean L Wu; Gordana Rašić; Omar S Akbari; John M Marshall
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 7.431

9.  A common gene drive language eases regulatory process and eco-evolutionary extensions.

Authors:  Prateek Verma; R Guy Reeves; Chaitanya S Gokhale
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-08-09

Review 10.  Gene drives gaining speed.

Authors:  Ethan Bier
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.