INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The prevalence of smokeless tobacco use in India is the highest in the world, with 26% of adults reporting being users of smokeless tobacco only. But to date, there are few studies of beliefs, knowledge, and other psychosocial measures relating to smokeless tobacco use in India. The aim of the present study was to use data from the ITC India Pilot Study conducted in 2006 to examine beliefs about the harms of smokeless tobacco use, knowledge of health effects, and intentions to quit among current smokeless tobacco users in two states, Maharashtra and Bihar. METHODS: Data from the ITC India Pilot Study, a face-to-face crosssectional survey of 248 adults reporting exclusive current use of smokeless tobacco in Maharashtra and Bihar, were analyzed with respect to the knowledge of health effects, beliefs about harmfulness, and intentions to quit smokeless tobacco use. RESULTS: Around three quarters (36%) of smokeless tobacco users from Maharashtra and two thirds (62%) from Bihar had a 'bad' opinion about smokeless tobacco use. About 77% believed that smokeless tobacco use causes mouth cancer, followed by gum disease (66%) and difficulty in opening the mouth (56%). Significant differences were found in health knowledge between urban and rural smokeless tobacco users in both states. Only 38% of smokeless tobacco users reported having intentions to quit, and only 11% had intentions to quit within the next 6 months. Smokeless tobacco users who reported higher knowledge of the specific health effects from smokeless tobacco use were more likely to have intentions to quit. CONCLUSION: Despite the fairly high levels of awareness of health effects from smokeless tobacco use in Maharashtra and Bihar, the majority of smokeless users had no intentions to quit. Increased educational efforts about the detrimental health effects from smokeless tobacco use may result in higher levels of knowledge about the harms of smokeless tobacco and this in turn could increase quit intentions and subsequent quitting among users.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The prevalence of smokeless tobacco use in India is the highest in the world, with 26% of adults reporting being users of smokeless tobacco only. But to date, there are few studies of beliefs, knowledge, and other psychosocial measures relating to smokeless tobacco use in India. The aim of the present study was to use data from the ITC India Pilot Study conducted in 2006 to examine beliefs about the harms of smokeless tobacco use, knowledge of health effects, and intentions to quit among current smokeless tobacco users in two states, Maharashtra and Bihar. METHODS: Data from the ITC India Pilot Study, a face-to-face crosssectional survey of 248 adults reporting exclusive current use of smokeless tobacco in Maharashtra and Bihar, were analyzed with respect to the knowledge of health effects, beliefs about harmfulness, and intentions to quit smokeless tobacco use. RESULTS: Around three quarters (36%) of smokeless tobacco users from Maharashtra and two thirds (62%) from Bihar had a 'bad' opinion about smokeless tobacco use. About 77% believed that smokeless tobacco use causes mouth cancer, followed by gum disease (66%) and difficulty in opening the mouth (56%). Significant differences were found in health knowledge between urban and rural smokeless tobacco users in both states. Only 38% of smokeless tobacco users reported having intentions to quit, and only 11% had intentions to quit within the next 6 months. Smokeless tobacco users who reported higher knowledge of the specific health effects from smokeless tobacco use were more likely to have intentions to quit. CONCLUSION: Despite the fairly high levels of awareness of health effects from smokeless tobacco use in Maharashtra and Bihar, the majority of smokeless users had no intentions to quit. Increased educational efforts about the detrimental health effects from smokeless tobacco use may result in higher levels of knowledge about the harms of smokeless tobacco and this in turn could increase quit intentions and subsequent quitting among users.
Authors: G G Dhumal; M S Pednekar; P C Gupta; G C Sansone; A C K Quah; M Bansal-Travers; G T Fong Journal: Indian J Cancer Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 1.224
Authors: Eve M Nagler; Dhirendra N Sinha; Mangesh S Pednekar; Anne M Stoddard; Prakash C Gupta; Neha Mathur; Harry Lando; Mira Aghi; Laura Shulman Cordeira; K Viswanath; Glorian Sorensen Journal: Prev Med Date: 2015-02-02 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Genevieve C Sansone; Lalit J Raute; Geoffrey T Fong; Mangesh S Pednekar; Anne C K Quah; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Prakash C Gupta; Dhirendra N Sinha Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Kamirul Islam; Indranil Saha; Rajib Saha; Sufi Abdul Samim Khan; Rupali Thakur; Swapnil Shivam Journal: Indian J Med Res Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Maansi Bansal-Travers; Geoffrey T Fong; Anne C K Quah; Genevieve Sansone; Mangesh S Pednekar; Prakash C Gupta; Dhirendra N Sinha Journal: J Epidemiol Glob Health Date: 2014-06-16
Authors: Pete Driezen; Abu S Abdullah; Nigar Nargis; A K M Ghulam Hussain; Geoffrey T Fong; Mary E Thompson; Anne C K Quah; Steve Xu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 3.390