Literature DB >> 2187376

Noninvasive cardiac output: simultaneous comparison of two different methods with thermodilution.

D H Wong1, K K Tremper, E A Stemmer, D O'Connor, S Wilbur, J Zaccari, C Reeves, P Weidoff, R J Trujillo.   

Abstract

The authors attempted to simultaneously measure cardiac output by thermodilution (COtd), thoracic bioimpedance (CObi), and suprasternal Doppler ultrasound (COdopp) in 68 patients. Subgroups separately compared included patients whose lungs were mechanically ventilated, patients undergoing cardiac surgery, aortic surgery, patients with dysrhythmias, and patients with sepsis. The authors also studied the value of the ventricular ejection time (VET) in evaluating the agreement of CObi and COdopp with COtd. Simultaneous CObi and COtd were available in a total of 56 patients (416 data sets) with an overall correlation coefficient r = 0.61, regression slope (m) of 0.52, intercept (y) of 2.46, and mean (CObi-COtd) difference (bias) of -0.67 +/- 1.72 (SD) l/min. Simultaneous COdopp and COtd were available in 59 patients (446 data sets) with an overall r = 0.51, m of 0.53, y of 2.05, and bias of -0.79 +/- 1.95 l/min. CObi agreed most closely with COtd in patients whose lungs were mechanically ventilated, who had not undergone cardiac or aortic surgery, and with VET difference less than 40 ms (16 patients, 99 data sets; r = 0.74; m = 0.97; y = 0.15; bias = -0.02 +/- 1.53 l/min). COdopp agreed most closely with COtd in patients whose lungs were mechanically ventilated, who had not undergone cardiac or aortic surgery, and in sinus rhythm with VET difference less than 40 ms (10 patients, 45 data sets; r = 0.82; m = 0.98; y = -0.07; bias = -0.82 +/-1.03 l/min). VET by radial artery can help evaluate the reliability of CObi and COdopp.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2187376     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199005000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  14 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques.

Authors:  L A Critchley; J A Critchley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  A new infrared tympanic thermometer in surgery and anesthesia.

Authors:  T Matsukawa; S Kashimoto; T Miyaji; K Hanagata; M Iriki; T Kumazawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Technology assessment of anesthesia monitors.

Authors:  N L Pace
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1992-04

4.  Comparison of impedance cardiography and dye dilution method for measuring cardiac output.

Authors:  W Spiering; P N van Es; P W de Leeuw
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Mesenteric, coeliac and splanchnic blood flow in humans during exercise.

Authors:  M J Perko; H B Nielsen; C Skak; J O Clemmesen; T V Schroeder; N H Secher
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  A comparison of the haemodynamic effects of intrathecal meperidine, meperidine-bupivacaine mixture and hyperbaric bupivacaine.

Authors:  F Conway; L A Critchley; J C Stuart; R C Freebairn
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Non-invasive continuous arterial pressure, heart rate and stroke volume measurements during graded head-up tilt in normal man.

Authors:  L A Critchley; F Conway; P J Anderson; B Tomlinson; J A Critchley
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.435

8.  Pacemaker malfunction due to microcurrent injection from a bioimpedance noninvasive cardiac output monitor.

Authors:  J A Aldrete; C Brown; J Daily; V Buerke
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1995-03

9.  Non-invasive measurement of left ventricular contractility by impedance cardiography.

Authors:  G Castor
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Flosequinan does not affect systemic and regional vascular responses to simulated orthostatic stress in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  J Duranteau; E Pussard; A Edouard; K Samii; A Berdeaux; J F Giudicelli
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.