Literature DB >> 21872956

Residual setup errors and dose variations with less-than-daily image guided patient setup in external beam radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Chunhui Han1, Daniel C Schiffner, Timothy E Schultheiss, Yi-Jen Chen, An Liu, Jeffrey Y C Wong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To evaluate residual patient setup errors and daily dose variations of different less-than-daily image guidance (IG) strategies in the delivery of external beam radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Daily image-guided setup data for 25 consecutive esophageal cancer patients treated with helical tomotherapy were evaluated. Seven less-than-daily IG strategies with different imaging frequencies were simulated. For each IG strategy, the daily residual setup errors were calculated. Using TomoTherapy Planned Adaptive software, daily dose variations to the clinical target volume, heart, and lungs were evaluated in five representative patients.
RESULTS: With 0% (60%) IG frequency, the margins required for adequate coverage of the clinical target volume were 13 mm (10 mm), 14 mm (11 mm), and 5 mm (5 mm) in the left-right, superior-inferior, and anterior-posterior directions, respectively. Even with 60% IG frequency, 10% of the fractions had more than 10% decrease in the dose level covering 95% of the target, and 14% and 13% of the fractions had more than 10% increase in total lung volume receiving at least 0.8 Gy per fraction, and heart volume receiving at least 1.2 Gy per fraction, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Substantial residual setup errors would occur for treatment fractions without IG even if the most frequent less-than-daily IG strategy was to be used, which could lead to significant daily dose variations for the target volume and adjacent normal tissues. Daily image guidance is recommended throughout the course of treatment in conformal radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21872956     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.07.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  12 in total

1.  Super-resolution imaging in a multiple layer EPID.

Authors:  Haijian Chen; Joerg Rottmann; Stephen Sf Yip; Daniel Morf; Rony Füglistaller; Josh Star-Lack; George Zentai; Ross Berbeco
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2017-02-21

Review 2.  Current status and future prospects of multi-dimensional image-guided particle therapy.

Authors:  Shinichiro Mori; Silvan Zenklusen; Antje-Christin Knopf
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-02-19

Review 3.  Imaging strategies in the management of oesophageal cancer: what's the role of MRI?

Authors:  Peter S N van Rossum; Richard van Hillegersberg; Frederiek M Lever; Irene M Lips; Astrid L H M W van Lier; Gert J Meijer; Maarten S van Leeuwen; Marco van Vulpen; Jelle P Ruurda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Intrafractional dose variation and beam configuration in carbon ion radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  M F Haefner; F Sterzing; D Krug; S A Koerber; O Jaekel; J Debus; M M Haertig
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Residual positioning errors and uncertainties for pediatric craniospinal irradiation and the impact of image guidance.

Authors:  Daniel Gram; André Haraldsson; N Patrik Brodin; Karsten Nysom; Thomas Björk-Eriksson; Per Munck Af Rosenschöld
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Impact of small residual setup errors after image guidance on heart dose and survival in non-small cell lung cancer treated with curative-intent radiotherapy.

Authors:  Corinne Johnson-Hart; Gareth Price; Alan McWilliam; Andrew Green; Corinne Faivre-Finn; Marcel van Herk
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent chemotherapy as definitive treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Falk Roeder; Nils H Nicolay; Tam Nguyen; Ladan Saleh-Ebrahimi; Vasilis Askoxylakis; Tilman Bostel; Felix Zwicker; Juergen Debus; Carmen Timke; Peter E Huber
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  A retrospective tomotherapy image-guidance study: analysis of more than 9,000 MVCT scans for ten different tumor sites.

Authors:  Patricia Sánchez-Rubio; Ruth Rodríguez-Romero; Pablo Castro-Tejero
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Effects of megavoltage computed tomographic scan methodology on setup verification and adaptive dose calculation in helical TomoTherapy.

Authors:  Jian Zhu; Tong Bai; Jiabing Gu; Ziwen Sun; Yumei Wei; Baosheng Li; Yong Yin
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Radiotherapy for small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: outcomes and prognostic factors from a retrospective study.

Authors:  Baoqing Chen; Han Yang; Huali Ma; Qiaoqiao Li; Bo Qiu; Yonghong Hu; Yujia Zhu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.