PURPOSE: To examine the prevalence of astigmatism (≥ 1.00 diopter [D]) and high astigmatism (≥ 2.00 D) from 6 months after term due date to 6 years of age in preterm children with birth weight of less than 1251 g in whom high-risk prethreshold retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) developed and who participated in the Early Treatment for ROP study. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred one infants in whom high-risk prethreshold ROP developed in 1 or both eyes and were randomized to early treatment (ET) versus conventional management (CM). Refractive error was measured by cycloplegic retinoscopy. Eyes were excluded if they underwent additional retinal, glaucoma, or cataract surgery. INTERVENTION: Eyes were randomized to receive laser photocoagulation at high-risk prethreshold ROP or to receive treatment only if threshold ROP developed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Astigmatism and high astigmatism at each study visit. RESULTS: For both ET and CM eyes, there was a consistent increase in prevalence of astigmatism over time, increasing from 42% at 4 years to 52% by 6 years for the group of ET eyes and from 47% to 54%, respectively, in the CM eyes. There was no statistically significant difference between the slopes (rate of change per month) of the ET and CM eyes for both astigmatism and high astigmatism (P = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: By 6 years of age, astigmatism of 1.00 D or more developed in more than 50% of eyes with high-risk prethreshold ROP, and nearly 25% of such eyes had high astigmatism (≥ 2.00 D). Presence of astigmatism was not influenced by timing of treatment, zone of acute-phase ROP, or presence of plus disease. However, there was a trend toward higher prevalence of astigmatism and high astigmatism in eyes with ROP residua. Most astigmatism was with-the-rule (75°-105°). More eyes with type 2 than type 1 ROP had astigmatism by 6 years. These findings reinforce the need for follow-up eye examinations through early grade school years in infants with high-risk prethreshold ROP. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To examine the prevalence of astigmatism (≥ 1.00 diopter [D]) and high astigmatism (≥ 2.00 D) from 6 months after term due date to 6 years of age in preterm children with birth weight of less than 1251 g in whom high-risk prethreshold retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) developed and who participated in the Early Treatment for ROP study. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred one infants in whom high-risk prethreshold ROP developed in 1 or both eyes and were randomized to early treatment (ET) versus conventional management (CM). Refractive error was measured by cycloplegic retinoscopy. Eyes were excluded if they underwent additional retinal, glaucoma, or cataract surgery. INTERVENTION: Eyes were randomized to receive laser photocoagulation at high-risk prethreshold ROP or to receive treatment only if threshold ROP developed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Astigmatism and high astigmatism at each study visit. RESULTS: For both ET and CM eyes, there was a consistent increase in prevalence of astigmatism over time, increasing from 42% at 4 years to 52% by 6 years for the group of ET eyes and from 47% to 54%, respectively, in the CM eyes. There was no statistically significant difference between the slopes (rate of change per month) of the ET and CM eyes for both astigmatism and high astigmatism (P = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: By 6 years of age, astigmatism of 1.00 D or more developed in more than 50% of eyes with high-risk prethreshold ROP, and nearly 25% of such eyes had high astigmatism (≥ 2.00 D). Presence of astigmatism was not influenced by timing of treatment, zone of acute-phase ROP, or presence of plus disease. However, there was a trend toward higher prevalence of astigmatism and high astigmatism in eyes with ROP residua. Most astigmatism was with-the-rule (75°-105°). More eyes with type 2 than type 1 ROP had astigmatism by 6 years. These findings reinforce the need for follow-up eye examinations through early grade school years in infants with high-risk prethreshold ROP. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Authors: G E Quinn; V Dobson; R Siatkowski; R J Hardy; J Kivlin; E A Palmer; D L Phelps; M X Repka; C G Summers; B Tung; W Chan Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Son C Huynh; Annette Kifley; Kathryn A Rose; Ian Morgan; Gillian Z Heller; Paul Mitchell Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Robert J Hardy; Earl A Palmer; Velma Dobson; C Gail Summers; Dale L Phelps; Graham E Quinn; William V Good; Betty Tung Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2003-12
Authors: Robert N Kleinstein; Lisa A Jones; Sandral Hullett; Soonsi Kwon; Robert J Lee; Nina E Friedman; Ruth E Manny; Donald O Mutti; Julie A Yu; Karla Zadnik Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2003-08
Authors: Bradley V Davitt; Velma Dobson; Graham E Quinn; Robert J Hardy; Betty Tung; William V Good Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2008-12-16 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Graham E Quinn; Velma Dobson; Bradley V Davitt; Robert J Hardy; Betty Tung; Claudia Pedroza; William V Good Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Graham E Quinn; Velma Dobson; Bradley V Davitt; David K Wallace; Robert J Hardy; Betty Tung; Dejian Lai; William V Good Journal: J AAPOS Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 1.220
Authors: Jingyun Wang; Xiaowei Ren; Li Shen; Susan E Yanni; Joel N Leffler; Eileen E Birch Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Gil Binenbaum; Edward F Bell; Pamela Donohue; Graham Quinn; James Shaffer; Lauren A Tomlinson; Gui-Shuang Ying Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 7.389