Literature DB >> 21872122

Diagnostic performance in differentiation of breast lesion on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel LCD monitor, and 5-megapixel LCD monitor.

Takeshi Kamitani1, Hidetake Yabuuchi, Yoshio Matsuo, Taro Setoguchi, Shuji Sakai, Takashi Okafuji, Shunya Sunami, Masamitsu Hatakenaka, Nobuhide Ishii, Makoto Kubo, Eriko Tokunaga, Hidetaka Yamamoto, Hiroshi Honda.   

Abstract

We compared observer performance of digital mammography among hard-copy readings and soft-copy readings using 3-megapixel (3M) and 5-megapixel (5M) liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors. Five experienced radiologists assessed 80 mammograms of 40 cancers and 40 benign lesions. There were no significant differences among the average A(z) of three modalities and among the κ values for intra- and interobserver agreement. The soft-copy reading using the 3M LCD monitor took a slightly longer time, although there were no significant differences.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21872122     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2010.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Imaging        ISSN: 0899-7071            Impact factor:   1.605


  5 in total

1.  The use of lower resolution viewing devices for mammographic interpretation: implications for education and training.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Jonathan J James; Anne E Turnbull; Alastair G Gale
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Effect of display monitor devices on intra-oral radiographic caries diagnosis.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Araki; Mamiko Fujikura; Tsukasa Sano
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Blurred digital mammography images: an analysis of technical recall and observer detection performance.

Authors:  Wang Kei Ma; Rita Borgen; Judith Kelly; Sara Millington; Beverley Hilton; Rob Aspin; Carla Lança; Peter Hogg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Which phantom is better for assessing the image quality in full-field digital mammography?: American College of Radiology Accreditation phantom versus digital mammography accreditation phantom.

Authors:  Sung Eun Song; Bo Kyoung Seo; An Yie; Bon Kyung Ku; Hee-Young Kim; Kyu Ran Cho; Hwan Hoon Chung; Seung Hwa Lee; Kyu-Won Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Technical and radiological image quality comparison of different liquid crystal displays for radiology.

Authors:  Francina Em Dams; K Y Esther Leung; Pieter Hm van der Valk; Marc Cjm Kock; Jeroen Bosman; Sjoerd P Niehof
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-10-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.