UNLABELLED: Our objective was to compare the inter-observer level of agreement in diagnosing pneumonia using the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for the interpretation of radiographs. We conducted a prospective study in a pediatric emergency room. Fifteen observers (13 pediatricians, 2 radiologists) interpreted 200 pediatric (<5 years old) chest radiographs using the WHO guidelines. Observers were blinded to the clinical presentation. RESULTS were analyzed for kappa values. Individual readings were compared to two "gold standard" teams: (1) radiologist and pediatrician and (2) two radiologists. RESULTS: Alveolar pneumonia, non-alveolar pneumonia, and no pneumonia were found (by radiologists) in 12.8%, 2.7%, and 78.6% of readings, respectively. The mean kappa values for alveolar pneumonia, non-alveolar pneumonia, and no pneumonia of observers versus the team consisting of a radiologist and a pediatrician were 0.73, 0.23, and 0.61, respectively. For non-alveolar pneumonia, the mean kappa value was higher for the gold standard consisting of a radiologist and a pediatrician when compared to the two-radiologist team. Pediatricians overdiagnosed "non-alveolar pneumonia" compared with radiologists. In contrast, for the alveolar pneumonia and no-pneumonia diagnoses, no significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: The WHO guidelines for interpretation of chest radiographs result in high level of agreement between readers for the definition of "alveolar pneumonia" and "no pneumonia" but poor agreement for non-alveolar pneumonia. The disagreement with regard to the latter was associated with overdiagnosis by pediatricians, which may lead to overtreatment. We believe that radiographic non-alveolar pneumonia should not be an endpoint for clinical trials and research, nor should it be implemented in clinical setting.
UNLABELLED: Our objective was to compare the inter-observer level of agreement in diagnosing pneumonia using the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for the interpretation of radiographs. We conducted a prospective study in a pediatric emergency room. Fifteen observers (13 pediatricians, 2 radiologists) interpreted 200 pediatric (<5 years old) chest radiographs using the WHO guidelines. Observers were blinded to the clinical presentation. RESULTS were analyzed for kappa values. Individual readings were compared to two "gold standard" teams: (1) radiologist and pediatrician and (2) two radiologists. RESULTS:Alveolar pneumonia, non-alveolar pneumonia, and no pneumonia were found (by radiologists) in 12.8%, 2.7%, and 78.6% of readings, respectively. The mean kappa values for alveolar pneumonia, non-alveolar pneumonia, and no pneumonia of observers versus the team consisting of a radiologist and a pediatrician were 0.73, 0.23, and 0.61, respectively. For non-alveolar pneumonia, the mean kappa value was higher for the gold standard consisting of a radiologist and a pediatrician when compared to the two-radiologist team. Pediatricians overdiagnosed "non-alveolar pneumonia" compared with radiologists. In contrast, for the alveolar pneumonia and no-pneumonia diagnoses, no significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: The WHO guidelines for interpretation of chest radiographs result in high level of agreement between readers for the definition of "alveolar pneumonia" and "no pneumonia" but poor agreement for non-alveolar pneumonia. The disagreement with regard to the latter was associated with overdiagnosis by pediatricians, which may lead to overtreatment. We believe that radiographic non-alveolar pneumonia should not be an endpoint for clinical trials and research, nor should it be implemented in clinical setting.
Authors: K Mulholland; S Hilton; R Adegbola; S Usen; A Oparaugo; C Omosigho; M Weber; A Palmer; G Schneider; K Jobe; G Lahai; S Jaffar; O Secka; K Lin; C Ethevenaux; B Greenwood Journal: Lancet Date: 1997-04-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Edgar Sarria; Gilberto B Fischer; João A B Lima; Sergio S Menna Barreto; José A M Flôres; Ricardo Sukiennik Journal: J Pediatr (Rio J) Date: 2003 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.197
Authors: Thomas Cherian; E Kim Mulholland; John B Carlin; Harald Ostensen; Ruhul Amin; Margaret de Campo; David Greenberg; Rosanna Lagos; Marilla Lucero; Shabir A Madhi; Katherine L O'Brien; Steven Obaro; Mark C Steinhoff Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2005-06-24 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: L Wubbel; L Muniz; A Ahmed; M Trujillo; C Carubelli; C McCoig; T Abramo; M Leinonen; G H McCracken Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Oluwatunmise A Fawole; Matthew S Kelly; Andrew P Steenhoff; Kristen A Feemster; Eric J Crotty; Mantosh S Rattan; Thuso David; Tiny Mazhani; Samir S Shah; Savvas Andronikou; Tonya Arscott-Mills Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2020-06-10
Authors: Oana G Falup-Pecurariu; Javier Diez-Domingo; Susanna Esposito; Adam Finn; Fernanda Rodrigues; Vana Spoulou; George A Syrogiannopoulos; Vytautas Usonis; David Greenberg Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2018-05-11 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Mohamed A Elemraid; Michelle Muller; David A Spencer; Stephen P Rushton; Russell Gorton; Matthew F Thomas; Katherine M Eastham; Fiona Hampton; Andrew R Gennery; Julia E Clark Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-08-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Henri Partouche; Céline Buffel du Vaure; Virginie Personne; Chloé Le Cossec; Camille Garcin; Alain Lorenzo; Christian Ghasarossian; Paul Landais; Laurent Toubiana; Serge Gilberg Journal: NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 2.871