Daniele Orso1, Alessio Ban2, Nicola Guglielmo2. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Ospedale Civile di Latisana (UD), A.A.S. 2 Bassa Friulana-Isontina, Via Sabbionera 45, 33053, Latisana, Udine, Italy. sd7782.do@gmail.com. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Ospedale Civile di Latisana (UD), A.A.S. 2 Bassa Friulana-Isontina, Via Sabbionera 45, 33053, Latisana, Udine, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Pneumonia is the third leading cause of death in children under 5 years of age worldwide. In pediatrics, both the accuracy and safety of diagnostic tools are important. Lung ultrasound (LUS) could be a safe diagnostic tool for this reason. We searched in the literature for diagnostic studies about LUS to predict pneumonia in pediatric patients using systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: The Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, SPORTDiscus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases from inception to September 2017 were searched. All studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of LUS in determining the presence of pneumonia in patients under 18 years of age were included. RESULTS: 1042 articles were found by systematic search. 76 articles were assessed for eligibility. Seventeen studies were included in the systematic review. We included 2612 pooled cases. The age of the pooled sample population ranged from 0 to about 21 years old. Summary sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.94 (IQR: 0.89-0.97), 0.93 (IQR: 0.86-0.98), and 0.98 (IQR: 0.94-0.99), respectively. No agreement on reference standard was detected: nine studies used chest X-rays, while four studies considered the clinical diagnosis. Only one study used computed tomography. CONCLUSIONS: LUS seems to be a promise tool for diagnosing pneumonia in children. However, the high heterogeneity found across the individual studies, and the absence of a reliable reference standard, make the finding questionable. More methodologically rigorous studies are needed.
PURPOSE:Pneumonia is the third leading cause of death in children under 5 years of age worldwide. In pediatrics, both the accuracy and safety of diagnostic tools are important. Lung ultrasound (LUS) could be a safe diagnostic tool for this reason. We searched in the literature for diagnostic studies about LUS to predict pneumonia in pediatric patients using systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: The Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, SPORTDiscus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases from inception to September 2017 were searched. All studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of LUS in determining the presence of pneumonia in patients under 18 years of age were included. RESULTS: 1042 articles were found by systematic search. 76 articles were assessed for eligibility. Seventeen studies were included in the systematic review. We included 2612 pooled cases. The age of the pooled sample population ranged from 0 to about 21 years old. Summary sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.94 (IQR: 0.89-0.97), 0.93 (IQR: 0.86-0.98), and 0.98 (IQR: 0.94-0.99), respectively. No agreement on reference standard was detected: nine studies used chest X-rays, while four studies considered the clinical diagnosis. Only one study used computed tomography. CONCLUSIONS: LUS seems to be a promise tool for diagnosing pneumonia in children. However, the high heterogeneity found across the individual studies, and the absence of a reliable reference standard, make the finding questionable. More methodologically rigorous studies are needed.
Authors: Michael Harris; Julia Clark; Nicky Coote; Penny Fletcher; Anthony Harnden; Michael McKean; Anne Thomson Journal: Thorax Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Vito Antonio Caiulo; Luna Gargani; Silvana Caiulo; Andrea Fisicaro; Fulvio Moramarco; Giuseppe Latini; Eugenio Picano; Giuseppe Mele Journal: Pediatr Pulmonol Date: 2012-05-02
Authors: Li Liu; Shefali Oza; Daniel Hogan; Jamie Perin; Igor Rudan; Joy E Lawn; Simon Cousens; Colin Mathers; Robert E Black Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-09-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Giulio Iorio; Maria Capasso; Giuseppe De Luca; Salvatore Prisco; Carlo Mancusi; Bruno Laganà; Vincenzo Comune Journal: PeerJ Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Contreras; Antonio Calvo-Cebrián; Juncal Díaz-Lázaro; Miguel Cruz-Arnés; Fernando León-Vázquez; María Del Carmen Lobón-Agúndez; Francisco Javier Palau-Cuevas; Paloma Henares-García; Fernando Gavilán-Martínez; Sandra Fernández-Plaza; Carmelo Prieto-Zancudo Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2022 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.707
Authors: Carmina Guitart; Esther Esteban; Judit Becerra; Javier Rodríguez-Fanjul; Francisco José Cambra; Mònica Balaguer; Iolanda Jordan Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2021-12-30 Impact factor: 3.953
Authors: Joanna Jaworska; Anna Komorowska-Piotrowska; Andrzej Pomiećko; Jakub Wiśniewski; Mariusz Woźniak; Błażej Littwin; Magdalena Kryger; Piotr Kwaśniewicz; Józef Szczyrski; Katarzyna Kulińska-Szukalska; Natalia Buda; Zbigniew Doniec; Wojciech Kosiak Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2020-11-11