RATIONALE: Subtypes of 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) in rats are thought to reflect positive affect and occur with cocaine or amphetamine delivery. In contexts predicting forthcoming cocaine, pre-drug anticipatory USVs are initially minimal during daily sessions but gradually escalate over several weeks, presumably as the animal learns to expect and look forward to impending drug access. To gain more insight into motivational aspects of cocaine intake in animal models of drug dependence studies, it is important to compare experience-dependent changes in lever response rate, USVs, and locomotion during cocaine conditioning and extinction trials. OBJECTIVE: To address whether cocaine-induced increases in lever responding and locomotor activity correspond with USV production. The study also determined whether short-term cocaine and context deprivation effects could be detected during conditioning or extinction. METHODS: Rats underwent 20 days of 60-min sessions of self- or yoked administration of cocaine (0.75 mg/kg/infusion, i.v.), followed by 19 days of extinction training (8 weeks total, weekends off). RESULTS: Lever responding for cocaine and cocaine-induced locomotor activity increased across conditioning sessions. In contrast, the number of frequency modulated 50-kHz USVs evoked in response to cocaine infusion decreased with cocaine experience, suggesting perhaps tolerance to the rewarding properties of the drug. In addition, USVs but not lever pressing or locomotion are affected after brief periods of drug and/or drug context abstinence. CONCLUSIONS: Except for initial drug exposure, increased cocaine seeking during cocaine delivery could reflect either enhanced drug motivation or the development of drug tolerance, but not enhanced positive affect.
RATIONALE: Subtypes of 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) in rats are thought to reflect positive affect and occur with cocaine or amphetamine delivery. In contexts predicting forthcoming cocaine, pre-drug anticipatory USVs are initially minimal during daily sessions but gradually escalate over several weeks, presumably as the animal learns to expect and look forward to impending drug access. To gain more insight into motivational aspects of cocaine intake in animal models of drug dependence studies, it is important to compare experience-dependent changes in lever response rate, USVs, and locomotion during cocaine conditioning and extinction trials. OBJECTIVE: To address whether cocaine-induced increases in lever responding and locomotor activity correspond with USV production. The study also determined whether short-term cocaine and context deprivation effects could be detected during conditioning or extinction. METHODS:Rats underwent 20 days of 60-min sessions of self- or yoked administration of cocaine (0.75 mg/kg/infusion, i.v.), followed by 19 days of extinction training (8 weeks total, weekends off). RESULTS: Lever responding for cocaine and cocaine-induced locomotor activity increased across conditioning sessions. In contrast, the number of frequency modulated 50-kHz USVs evoked in response to cocaine infusion decreased with cocaine experience, suggesting perhaps tolerance to the rewarding properties of the drug. In addition, USVs but not lever pressing or locomotion are affected after brief periods of drug and/or drug context abstinence. CONCLUSIONS: Except for initial drug exposure, increased cocaine seeking during cocaine delivery could reflect either enhanced drug motivation or the development of drug tolerance, but not enhanced positive affect.
Authors: Allison M Ahrens; Sean T Ma; Esther Y Maier; Christine L Duvauchelle; Timothy Schallert Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2008-09-03 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Esther Y Maier; Ramon T Ledesma; Andrew P Seiwell; Christine L Duvauchelle Journal: Pharmacol Biochem Behav Date: 2008-07-20 Impact factor: 3.533
Authors: Jeffrey Burgdorf; Roger A Kroes; Joseph R Moskal; James G Pfaus; Stefan M Brudzynski; Jaak Panksepp Journal: J Comp Psychol Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 2.231
Authors: Roman Stefański; Barbara Ziółkowska; Maciej Kuśmider; Paweł Mierzejewski; Edyta Wyszogrodzka; Paulina Kołomańska; Marta Dziedzicka-Wasylewska; Ryszard Przewłocki; Wojciech Kostowski Journal: Brain Res Date: 2007-05-06 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: James M Reno; Neha Thakore; Rueben Gonzales; Timothy Schallert; Richard L Bell; W Todd Maddox; Christine L Duvauchelle Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Nitish Mittal; Neha Thakore; James M Reno; Richard L Bell; W Todd Maddox; Timothy Schallert; Christine L Duvauchelle Journal: Alcohol Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 2.405
Authors: Gisele de Oliveira Guaita; Debora Dalla Vecchia; Roberto Andreatini; Donita L Robinson; Rainer K W Schwarting; Claudio Da Cunha Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Viktoria Y Topper; Michael P Reilly; Lauren M Wagner; Lindsay M Thompson; Ross Gillette; David Crews; Andrea C Gore Journal: Mol Cell Endocrinol Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 4.102
Authors: David J Barker; Steven J Simmons; Lisa C Servilio; Danielle Bercovicz; Sisi Ma; David H Root; Anthony P Pawlak; Mark O West Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 4.530