BACKGROUND: Emotional states are often thought to drive excessive alcohol intake and influence the development of alcohol use disorders. To gain insight into affective properties associated with excessive alcohol intake, we utilized ultrasonic vocalization (USV) detection and analyses to characterize the emotional phenotype of selectively bred alcohol-preferring (P) rats; an established animal model of excessive alcohol intake. USVs emitted by rodents have been convincingly associated with positive (50-55 kHz frequency-modulated [FM]) and negative (22-28 kHz) affective states. Therefore, we hypothesized that 50-55 and 22-28 kHz USV emission patterns in P rats would reveal a unique emotional phenotype sensitive to alcohol experience. METHODS: 50-55 kHz FM and 22-28 kHz USVs elicited from male P rats were assessed during access to water, 15 and 30% EtOH (v/v). Ethanol (EtOH; n = 12) or water only (Control; n = 4) across 8 weeks of daily drinking-in-the-dark (DID) sessions. RESULTS: Spontaneous 22-28 kHz USVs are emitted by alcohol-naïve P rats and are enhanced by alcohol experience. During DID sessions when alcohol was not available (e.g., "EtOH OFF" intervals), significantly more 22-28 kHz than 50-55 kHz USVs were elicited, while significantly more 50-55 kHz FM than 22-28 kHz USVs were emitted when alcohol was available (e.g., "EtOH ON" intervals). In addition, USV acoustic property analyses revealed chronic effects of alcohol experience on 22-28 kHz USV mean frequency, indicative of lasting alcohol-mediated alterations to neural substrates underlying emotional response. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that acute and chronic effects of alcohol exposure are reflected in changes in 22-28 and 50-55 kHz FM USV counts and acoustic patterns. These data support the notion that initiation and maintenance of alcohol intake in P rats may be due to a unique, alcohol-responsive emotional phenotype and further suggest that spontaneous 22-28 kHz USVs serve as behavioral markers for excessive drinking vulnerability.
BACKGROUND: Emotional states are often thought to drive excessive alcohol intake and influence the development of alcohol use disorders. To gain insight into affective properties associated with excessive alcohol intake, we utilized ultrasonic vocalization (USV) detection and analyses to characterize the emotional phenotype of selectively bred alcohol-preferring (P) rats; an established animal model of excessive alcohol intake. USVs emitted by rodents have been convincingly associated with positive (50-55 kHz frequency-modulated [FM]) and negative (22-28 kHz) affective states. Therefore, we hypothesized that 50-55 and 22-28 kHz USV emission patterns in P rats would reveal a unique emotional phenotype sensitive to alcohol experience. METHODS: 50-55 kHz FM and 22-28 kHz USVs elicited from male P rats were assessed during access to water, 15 and 30% EtOH (v/v). Ethanol (EtOH; n = 12) or water only (Control; n = 4) across 8 weeks of daily drinking-in-the-dark (DID) sessions. RESULTS: Spontaneous 22-28 kHz USVs are emitted by alcohol-naïve P rats and are enhanced by alcohol experience. During DID sessions when alcohol was not available (e.g., "EtOH OFF" intervals), significantly more 22-28 kHz than 50-55 kHz USVs were elicited, while significantly more 50-55 kHz FM than 22-28 kHz USVs were emitted when alcohol was available (e.g., "EtOH ON" intervals). In addition, USV acoustic property analyses revealed chronic effects of alcohol experience on 22-28 kHz USV mean frequency, indicative of lasting alcohol-mediated alterations to neural substrates underlying emotional response. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that acute and chronic effects of alcohol exposure are reflected in changes in 22-28 and 50-55 kHz FM USV counts and acoustic patterns. These data support the notion that initiation and maintenance of alcohol intake in P rats may be due to a unique, alcohol-responsive emotional phenotype and further suggest that spontaneous 22-28 kHz USVs serve as behavioral markers for excessive drinking vulnerability.
Authors: Adriana A Alcantara; Violeta Chen; Bruce E Herring; John M Mendenhall; Monica L Berlanga Journal: Brain Res Date: 2003-10-03 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Z A Rodd; R L Bell; D L McKinzie; A A Webster; J M Murphy; L Lumeng; T-K Li; W J McBride Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Zachary A Rodd; Roberto I Melendez; Richard L Bell; Kelly A Kuc; Ying Zhang; James M Murphy; William J McBride Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2004-02-04 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Nitish Mittal; Neha Thakore; James M Reno; Richard L Bell; W Todd Maddox; Timothy Schallert; Christine L Duvauchelle Journal: Alcohol Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 2.405
Authors: James M Reno; Neha Thakore; Lawrence K Cormack; Timothy Schallert; Richard L Bell; W Todd Maddox; Christine L Duvauchelle Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Neha Thakore; James M Reno; Rueben A Gonzales; Timothy Schallert; Richard L Bell; W Todd Maddox; Christine L Duvauchelle Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Catherine B Ashley; Ryan D Snyder; James E Shepherd; Catalina Cervantes; Nitish Mittal; Sheila Fleming; Jaxon Bailey; Maisie D Nievera; Sharmin Islam Souleimanova; Bill Nyaoga; Lauren Lichtenfeld; Alicia R Chen; W Todd Maddox; Christine L Duvauchelle Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2021-06-29