PURPOSE: In many countries, meeting subject recruitment goals is challenging for researchers relying on clinical staff members (CSMs) to identify or recruit subjects. This paper describes research strategies that improved staff engagement in three different studies conducted in US clinical settings. METHOD: The recruitment strategies described in this paper were identified during the process of consultation among three US researchers recruiting via CSMs. Strategies which successfully engaged CSMs are described. RESULTS: Our approach improved engagement with CSMs in three different US studies. Early engagement strategies included establishing trust, gathering input from CSMs, and using succinct training procedures as well as a study logo. Middle phase strategies included assigning recruitment, publishing a study newsletter, giving the CSMs compensation and appreciation for their participation, and expanding the subject pool. Completion strategies included closing with an appreciation meeting and adding merit letters to personnel files. CONCLUSION: Recruitment of an adequate number of subjects is often challenging, even within clinical settings where subject populations are abundant. CSMs have rightly prioritised clinical care over directing subjects to research studies. It is therefore critical that researchers recruiting in such clinical settings anticipate recruitment challenges and plan to implement appropriate engagement strategies in all phases of research.
PURPOSE: In many countries, meeting subject recruitment goals is challenging for researchers relying on clinical staff members (CSMs) to identify or recruit subjects. This paper describes research strategies that improved staff engagement in three different studies conducted in US clinical settings. METHOD: The recruitment strategies described in this paper were identified during the process of consultation among three US researchers recruiting via CSMs. Strategies which successfully engaged CSMs are described. RESULTS: Our approach improved engagement with CSMs in three different US studies. Early engagement strategies included establishing trust, gathering input from CSMs, and using succinct training procedures as well as a study logo. Middle phase strategies included assigning recruitment, publishing a study newsletter, giving the CSMs compensation and appreciation for their participation, and expanding the subject pool. Completion strategies included closing with an appreciation meeting and adding merit letters to personnel files. CONCLUSION: Recruitment of an adequate number of subjects is often challenging, even within clinical settings where subject populations are abundant. CSMs have rightly prioritised clinical care over directing subjects to research studies. It is therefore critical that researchers recruiting in such clinical settings anticipate recruitment challenges and plan to implement appropriate engagement strategies in all phases of research.
Authors: Kathleen C Buckwalter; Margaret Grey; Barbara Bowers; Ann Marie McCarthy; Deborah Gross; Marjorie Funk; Cornelia Beck Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: R Foy; J Parry; A Duggan; B Delaney; S Wilson; N Th Lewin-Van Den Broek; A Lassen; L Vickers; P Myres Journal: Fam Pract Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 2.267
Authors: Alison M McDonald; Rosemary C Knight; Marion K Campbell; Vikki A Entwistle; Adrian M Grant; Jonathan A Cook; Diana R Elbourne; David Francis; Jo Garcia; Ian Roberts; Claire Snowdon Journal: Trials Date: 2006-04-07 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Janice D Crist; Maricruz R Ruiz; Oscar H Torres-Urquidy; Alice Pasvogel; Joseph T Hepworth Journal: Res Gerontol Nurs Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 1.571
Authors: Elizabeth G Nesmith; Regina S Medeiros; Colville H B Ferdinand; Michael L Hawkins; Steven B Holsten; Yanbin Dong; Haidong Zhu Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2013-07-01 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Deborah Davis; Ellen Nohr; Catherine Knight-Agarwal; Tanya Lawlis; Helen Skouteris; Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz; Rachel Davey; Lauren T Williams; Maralyn Foureur; Jeremy Oats Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2018-05-30
Authors: Amy Bartlett; Stephen J Kolb; Allison Kingsley; Kathryn J Swoboda; Sandra P Reyna; Ai Sakonju; Basil T Darras; Richard Shell; Nancy Kuntz; Diana Castro; Susan T Iannaccone; Julie Parsons; Anne M Connolly; Claudia A Chiriboga; Craig McDonald; W Bryan Burnette; Klaus Werner; Mathula Thangarajh; Perry B Shieh; Erika Finanger; Christopher S Coffey; Jon W Yankey; Merit E Cudkowicz; Michelle M McGovern; D Elizabeth McNeil; W David Arnold; John T Kissel Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2018-07-20
Authors: Barbara Hanratty; Elizabeth Lowson; Louise Holmes; Julia Addington-Hall; Antony Arthur; Gunn Grande; Sheila Payne; Jane Seymour Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-09-27 Impact factor: 2.655